LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Bump this every day Trump doesn't release the Epstein list that ultra-dumb Deplorables swore he would

Epstein victim urged FBI to look at Trump twice

One of Jeffrey Epstein’s accusers twice urged the FBI to look at Donald Trump following an alleged incident with him.

In 1996, Maria Farmer, told police she was groped by Epstein and his former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell. Ms Farmer, who worked for Epstein as an art advisor, was one of the first people to accuse the paedophile financier of sexual misconduct.
Click to expand...

She claimed the impromptu meeting took place just before she began working for Epstein. Ms Farmer said she arrived in running shorts and that Mr Trump hovered over her and stared at her legs, making her feel scared.
Click to expand...
She said Epstein then entered the room and said: “No, no. She’s not here for you,” before the pair left together. Ms Farmer claimed she then heard Mr Trump say he thought she was 16 years old.
Click to expand...
 
IMG_3686.jpeg

It’s being crowdfunded to be all over London during trumps uk visit.

🚨TRUMP COMING TO THE UK🚨
It would be such a shame for Donald if this photo of Trump with Jeffrey Epstein appeared absolutely EVERYWHERE on his tour of the UK. It would truly be such a huge shame if everyone donated to make that happen 👀
'crowdfunder co uk/p/trump-uk-visit-epstein'
#everyonehateselon
 
Why the Supreme Court could take up Ghislaine Maxwell’s appeal over Epstein agreement

Even if the justices agree to take Maxwell’s case, however, that wouldn’t necessarily mean they’re interested in the validity of the underlying charges against her, which involve conspiring with Epstein to traffic minors. Rather, as savvy lawyers do when petitioning the high court, her counsel presents the issue as a general legal matter that needs a nationwide resolution, something the justices are in the business of providing.
Click to expand...

In Maxwell’s case, that issue is whether a promise on behalf of the “United States” or the “Government” that’s made by a U.S. attorney in one district binds federal prosecutors in other districts.

That’s important to Maxwell’s case because, she argues, a non-prosecution agreement secured by Epstein in Florida should’ve barred her charges in New York because the agreement said, in part, that “the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein.”
Click to expand...

seems to me that maxwell's playing a dirty game with trump: on the one hand, she and her family have threatened him to 'keep the deal' made with epstein, which would mean her conviction could be thrown out and a new trial possibly instated... on the other, she's been offering to testify to congress about epstein's world (an offer bondi's refused and we've already seen trump doubling down on wishing her well.) So Donald's got a problem: if he makes sure she gets her conviction overturned for the price of her silence at a new trial, it'll inflame his already boiling magats—but if he manages to sway the Supreme Court into NOT taking up her appeal on its basis presented, she holds even more dirt on him that will eventually leach out.

do I feel pity for him? don't be silly.
 
Wolffe says epstein believed trump was the first to report him to police after real estate falling out in 2004

Trump orbiters Michael Wolff and Michael Cohen discussed President Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, going from best friends to real estate rivals, to Epstein making threats after he believed Trump "went to the Palm Beach Police and said, 'Jeffrey Epstein has young girls at his house'—thereby beginning the legal process which would ultimately bring Jeffrey Epstein down."
Click to expand...
 
JD Vance Visited the Murdochs Right Before the WSJ Dropped Trump’s Letter to Epstein

lol

whether he went to attempt to advance his own ambitions, or to plead with murdoch & son not to print, it likely won't turn out quite as he hoped.

Vance’s sudden enthusiasm for Big Sky country adds an extra measure of turmoil into the already roiling stew of MAGA politics. The president is being belabored by large portions of his base over documents detailing his relationship with Epstein, perhaps the most notorious American human trafficker since the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment. Many of those same MAGAnauts have no use for Vance, whom they view as a) the ambitious climber that he is and b) the tool of a new tech elite led by gazillionaire Peter Thiel, Vance’s one-man raison d’être as a politician.
Click to expand...

This latest news places the most fervent members of the cult in a terrible bind, but, to my mind anyway, if it ever comes to a choice, and if the feeling that Vance is organizing a coup becomes general within the cult, Vance will go overboard first. Personally, I think it’s the eyeliner.
Click to expand...
 
Bray123 said:
MAGATs are hypocrites.
The Epstein Files have already been edited by order of Trump to remove all references to Trump. The version that Trump has ordered to be released will (currently) have all names or other identifiers redacted. Not just victims, but perps as well.

Why would the Pedophile in Chief want his name redacted from a list of pedophiles? True MAGATs won't want to know.


https://time.com/7303673/donald-trump-epstein-files-fbi-durbin/


After hundreds of thousands of hours spent removing Trump's name from the files, Trump announced that his name was not included in the files that did not exist but were written by Hilary.
Click to expand...
We need a foia to discover the directive from Bongino to see publicly
 
“I’ll go backstage before a show, and everyone’s getting dressed and ready and everything else,” he said, in a tape obtained by CNN. “And you know, no men are anywhere. And I’m allowed to go in because I’m the owner of the pageant. And therefore I’m inspecting it. ‘Is everyone OK?’ You know, they’re standing there with no clothes. And you see these incredible-looking women. And so I sort of get away with things like that.”
 
ll74 said:
“I’ll go backstage before a show, and everyone’s getting dressed and ready and everything else,” he said, in a tape obtained by CNN. “And you know, no men are anywhere. And I’m allowed to go in because I’m the owner of the pageant. And therefore I’m inspecting it. ‘Is everyone OK?’ You know, they’re standing there with no clothes. And you see these incredible-looking women. And so I sort of get away with things like that.”
Click to expand...
Gross.
 
so the oversight committee is planning on issuing a subpoena for maxwell...

what does this really mean?

I've seen footage, fairly recent given the look of her, where she certainly doesn't seem to have any remorse or even accept she did this stuff. If she lies, which is perfectly possible if she believes she/her family can move trump to 'make sure' she gets a new trial and ends up walking free, trump can claim exoneration of the claims against him.

It is a considered gamble on both their parts; if she gets a new trial, sticks to her lies but gets convicted anyway, she still has all the receipts.
 
butters said:
so the oversight committee is planning on issuing a subpoena for maxwell...

what does this really mean?

I've seen footage, fairly recent given the look of her, where she certainly doesn't seem to have any remorse or even accept she did this stuff. If she lies, which is perfectly possible if she believes she/her family can move trump to 'make sure' she gets a new trial and ends up walking free, trump can claim exoneration of the claims against him.

It is a considered gamble on both their parts; if she gets a new trial, sticks to her lies but gets convicted anyway, she still has all the receipts.
Click to expand...
It means nothing. They've interviewed her multiple times already. This is just a public display of "we're doing everything we can but the courts won't let us..." Which will eventually be their end point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top