What ever the "experts" tell you.....

[HisArpy]

Btw - you consistently deflect away from direct questions I ask you.

You mean the questions you're only looking for validation for? Or do you mean the ones that are so nonsensical their only purpose is to make you look like you're saying something profound when you're really just jabbering to yourself?

Those questions?

 

[HisArpy]

Poor Derpy.

Yes, that's right. You just keep on thinking and saying this. I'm sure that eventually you'll get ahead one day after you decide to patent your iconic sayings and sell them to the world.

Or not and you'll go down in history as the second dumbest idjit on Lit.

 

[ll74]

You mean the questions you're only looking for validation for? Or do you mean the ones that are so nonsensical their only purpose is to make you look like you're saying something profound when you're really just jabbering to yourself?

Those questions?

Nope. Direct questions that you don't answer. Feel free to review our past discussions as needed.

 

[ll74]

Pattern and practice, dudly. It's called pattern and practice.

So you complaining because I'm not saying what you're accusing me of saying.

Neat!

When you consistently do or say something in a certain way, it's a tell about what you really intended to do or say.

Or you just read into what I say to fit your bias and blame me for doing so

Yep, that's it.

Guess what you do.

I ask you direct questions and you don't answer them.

 

[HisArpy]

Nope. Direct questions that you don't answer. Feel free to review our past discussions as needed.

dudly, since when do YOU get to tell me what questions to answer? And doesn't that sound kinda fascist-y?

And of course, the questions you ask ARE only poised for your self validation so you don't really need anyone to answer them.

Now, do I need to explain that to you more than twice?

 

[Rebel5soul]

Showing of federal force in states with ICE and the military is an example of fascism.

Thanks for coming to my ted.talk.

That is called "enforcing the laws passed by congress." But worthless fucking Communists like yourself can't deal with that.

Put me in charge, I'll show you what Fascism is. I'll strip every fucking Communist (Socialist) of their citizenship and deport them to the very worst Communist/Socialist shit holes on the face of the Earth.

 

[HisArpy]

So you complaining because I'm not saying what you're accusing me of saying.

Neat!

Why Mr. Simpleton, how ever did you manage to mangle the English language so badly that you fail to understand legal principles after they're explained to you?

Or you just read into what I say to fit your bias and blame me for doing so

Yep, that's it.

Nice deflection away from established principles of fact finding.

You see, the way it works is that you say something, I say something, other people read it and decide which one of us is stupid. In your case, you desperately try to say something/anything, I point out the flaws in your drivel, and suddenly you don't understand what happened so you point fingers everywhere except at the guy in your morning mirror.

Nice. Because that makes it easy for everyone who reads your shit to understand who's the stupid one in our conversations

It's your "pattern and practice."

I ask you direct questions and you don't answer them.

You ask rhetorical questions that are only offered for self validation. You don't seek truth, you seek attention. Your main problem with the attention you get is that it's not giving you the stroking you're looking for.

Which is ALL on you.

And of course after you once again get your ass handed to you, you somehow manage to lose the keys to the cabinet where you keep your intellect prisoner. Because what else do you have to do all day/every day except make yourself look like an idjit in public. Right?

 

[ll74]

Why Mr. Simpleton, how ever did you manage to mangle the English language so badly that you fail to understand legal principles after they're explained to you?

There is no language where I'm saying what you are accusing me of saying.

But keep trying.

Nice deflection away from established principles of fact finding.

In your case, you desperately try to say something/anything, I point out the flaws in your drivel, and suddenly you don't understand what happened so you point fingers everywhere except at the guy in your morning mirror.

Nice.

It sounds like my responses frustrate you. Poor guy

Not that it ever works, but it's your "pattern and practice."

My posts do seem to bother you.

And obviously that's my fault

You ask rhetorical questions that are only offered for self validation. You don't seek truth, you seek attention. Your main problem with the attention you get is that it's not giving you the stroking you're looking for.

I asked you direct questions and you fail to answer them.
I get that you don't like the questions and obviously that, again, is my fault.

Which is ALL on you.

See?

And of course after you once again get your ass handed yet you, you somehow manage to lose the keys to the cabinet where you keep your intellect prisoner. Because what else do you have to do all day/every day except make yourself look like an idjit in public. Right?

I certainly don't give a shit about your opinion of me or my actions, correct.

 

[DeluxAuto]

as the second dumbest idjit on Lit.

At least you're first at something in your miserable excuse for a life.

 

[HisArpy]

At least you're first at something in your miserable excuse for a life.

Ahh, but you forgot about rorbags. Who is, the self professed, greatest on Lit. Which makes HIM the #1 idjit on Lit.

So you see, your iconic statements aren't all that iconic. In fact, they're rather dum. Which is why you can't sell them to very many people.

 

[HisArpy]

There is no language where I'm saying what you are accusing me of saying.

But keep trying.




It sounds like my responses frustrate you. Poor guy


My posts do seem to bother you.

And obviously that's my fault


I asked you direct questions and you fail to answer them.
I get that you don't like the questions and obviously that, again, is my fault.


See?


I certainly don't give a shit about your opinion of me or my actions, correct.

You really are a bag of laughs, so let me explain it to you AGAIN.

You say stuff, I say stuff, and OTHER PEOPLE get to decide which of us is the dummy.

Now, let's look at your history. In almost EVERY conversation you have, regardless of topic or who your talking with, you say dumb stuff and get called stupid for it. Next your conversations devolve into the same pattern where you start claiming that you didn't say something you're being "accused" of saying.

Why is that? I mean it's not like it's a rare occurrence, it's in nearly every conversation you're involved in. This conversation being a perfect example of it. How could it be so common if you're not doing it as you claim? The answer, of course, is that you ARE making the claims except you're very careful to never actually say the words. Instead you linger around the edges making very carefully orchestrated moves so that the impression you want to give is very evident without you actually saying it outright. This is a hallmark of an agitator and it's nothing more than an attempt at plausible deniability while being a shit stirrer. Except people aren't totally stupid (I make an exception in your case) and they can see right through what you're doing.

Which leads us to the next point. Let's take the online character of the people who call you stupid. Many of them are the members who post the topics for discussion and who are well versed in those topics. They're here for the discussion because they believe that discussion helps everyone formulate their opinion and position on the topic being discussed. It's often very difficult to hash out where you stand on an issue, especially when it's complicated, when you only have yourself to talk to. Posting for discussion here is how many members get themselves sorted out.

These are the ones who call you stupid on a regular basis.

Conversely, those in your corner seem to be the main Lit troll squad comprising various Alts as well as known Lit ignoramuses who are here only to stir trouble.

Contrast and compare and suddenly it becomes very obvious that you're not all that. In fact, you're not much of anything when it comes to debate.

Which is fine, if that's the look you want. However, in your case it's not enough. You want accolades and attention too. And when you don't get any you revert to type and start these conversations like this one that only highlight WHY.

And when you finally get shown the door you use the same exit strategy:

Of course

It's called pattern and practice. Yours is easy and simple to spot. And now we have a short interlude where you foam and froth at the mouth before coming back and furiously typing your opinion of my style.

Let me help you before you begin on that by directing you to read my siggy.

 

[ll74]

You really are a bag of laughs, so let me explain it to you AGAIN.

You say stuff, I say stuff, and OTHER PEOPLE get to decide which of us is the dummy.

So you're performing for other people here?

Neat

Now, let's look at your history. In almost EVERY conversation you have, regardless of topic or who your talking with, you say dumb stuff and get called stupid for it. Next your conversations devolve into the same pattern where you start claiming that you didn't say something you're being "accused" of saying.

Yes,.my history of posting here truly seems to bother you.

Poor guy.

Why is that? I mean it's not like it's a rare occurrence, it's in nearly every conversation you're involved in. This conversation being a perfect example of it. How could it be so common if you're not doing it as you claim? The answer, of course, is that you ARE making the claims except you're very careful to never actually say the words. Instead you linger around the edges making very carefully orchestrated moves so that the impression you want to give is very evident without you actually saying it outright. This is a hallmark of an agitator and it's nothing more than an attempt at plausible deniability while being a shit stirrer. Except people aren't totally stupid (I make an exception in your case) and they can see right through what you're doing.

Lol...I asked you specific questions and now you've been lecturing me for multiple posts about what that means to you instead of answering those questions.

Which leads us to the next point. Let's take the online character of the people who call you stupid. Many of them are the members who post the topics for discussion and who are well versed in those topics. They're here for the discussion because they believe that discussion helps everyone formulate their opinion and position on the topic being discussed. It's often very difficult to hash out where you stand on an issue, especially when it's complicated, when you only have yourself to talk to. Posting for discussion here is how many members get themselves sorted out.

And the lecture continues.

These are the ones who call you stupid on a regular basis.

Neat

Conversely, those in your corner seem to be the main Lit troll squad comprising various Alts as well as known Lit ignoramuses who are here only to stir trouble.

Aah yes......those in "my corner" because this is truly a competition and it's all about who is on your side.

Contrast and compare and suddenly it becomes very obvious that you're not all that. In fact, you're not much of anything when it comes to debate.

And yet here you are spending multiple posts elaborating on shit to prove your importance.

I guess that's part of your performance.
Well done.

Which is fine, if that's the look you want. However, in your case it's not enough. You want accolades and attention too. And when you don't get any you revert to type and start these conversations like this one that only highlight WHY.

I don't, but it's fun that you think I do.

And when you finally get shown the door you use the same exit strategy:

There is no door. I post when I want and don't when I don't.

Of course

It's called pattern and practice. Yours is easy and simple to spot. And now we have a short interlude where you foam and froth at the mouth before coming back and furiously typing your opinion of my style.

Lol
Of course.

Let me help you before you begin on that by directing you to read my siggy.

I could give a shit how self important you believe yourself to be. All I see is multiple posts, each one longer from the last, in a diatribe of bullshit. It was fun to read...thanks.

You certainly go out of your way to deflect from simple direct questions. I'll take that as a non answer.

 

[HisArpy]

So you're performing for other people here?

Neat


Yes,.my history of posting here truly seems to bother you.

Poor guy.


Lol...I asked you specific questions and now you've been lecturing me for multiple posts about what that means to you instead of answering those questions.


And the lecture continues.




Neat


Aah yes......those in "my corner" because this is truly a competition and it's all about who is on your side.


And yet here you are spending multiple posts elaborating on shit to prove your importance.

I guess that's part of your performance.
Well done.


I don't, but it's fun that you think I do.


There is no door. I post when I want and don't when I don't.


Lol
Of course.


I could give a shit how self important you believe yourself to be. All I see is multiple posts, each one longer from the last, in a diatribe of bullshit. It was fun to read...thanks.

You certainly go out of your way to deflect from simple direct questions. I'll take that as a non answer.

Your usual tell is all I needed to see. The rest of your tripe is probably as stupid as it usually is.

Have a great day, loser.

 

[ll74]

Your usual tell is all I needed to see. The rest of your tripe is probably as stupid as it usually is.

Neat!

Have a great day, loser.

Does this mean I showed you the door or you showed me the door?

Am I posting from outside the door now?

It's entertaining that you put in so much into your reply to me...which I replied to in mind....and now you've just decided it's not worth your time. ¯⁠\⁠(⁠°⁠_⁠o⁠)⁠/⁠¯

Fun times

 

[DeluxAuto]

Ahh, but you forgot about rorbags. Who is, the self professed, greatest on Lit. Which makes HIM the #1 idjit on Lit.

So you see, your iconic statements aren't all that iconic. In fact, they're rather dum. Which is why you can't sell them to very many people.

You're a lawyer who voted for a convicted felon 3 times. Shut your hole.

 

[Lance_Castro]

You're a lawyer who voted for a convicted felon 3 times. Shut your hole.

He picks winners twice as often as you.

Ahaha!

 

[Rebel5soul]

He picks winners twice as often as you.

Ahaha!

OK, that's funny.

 

[Lazaran]

He picks winners twice as often as you.

Ahaha!

Derpy is an imbecile that picked an imbecile twice…

That ^ all tracks…



Lacy simping for Derpy also tracks…



Derpy & Lacy



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[DeluxAuto]

He picks winners twice as often as you.

Ahaha!

Do you believe trump is a winner? Of course you do because you like girls of a very young age too. Mostly because you see them eye to eye.

 

[DeluxAuto]

"Ole Joe's sharp as a tack"

STFU, ChodeBum.

 

[dmallord]

Yes, that's right. You just keep on thinking and saying this. I'm sure that eventually you'll get ahead one day after you decide to patent your iconic sayings and sell them to the world.

Or not and you'll go down in history as the second dumbest idjit on Lit.

Ah, yes, the legend of the undefeated litigator of Lit. Derpy is renowned for his meticulous reasoning on topics such as the lethal force of 12V batteries and the molecular properties of carbonated water.

If “Poor Derpy” does get trademarked, I suspect your name will appear in the footnotes, right after “Exhibit A” and just before the section labeled Impressive Misfires in Legal Logic.

You are the forum's entertainment content value: undefeated. It makes perfect sense that you get the appropriate recognition for the term, 'Poor Derpy.' It is perfectly aligned with your narcissistic idol.

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

Maybe some day you brain dead Commies will get around to pointing out said Fascism..................in detail. But you don't, you just mouth the words as if they mean something.

 

[DeluxAuto]

View attachment 2553724

Enough about Reichguide.

 

[Lance_Castro]

Do you believe trump is a winner?

Poor luuuk. So stupid.
Lol


“In his third run for president in 2024, Donald Trump won with a voter coalition that was more racially and ethnically diverse than in 2020 or 2016, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of the 2024 electorate.”

 

[DeluxAuto]

Poor luuuk. So stupid.
Lol


“In his third run for president in 2024, Donald Trump won with a voter coalition that was more racially and ethnically diverse than in 2020 or 2016, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of the 2024 electorate.”

What?