
Um, the Israelis should probably have continued with their strict extreme prejudice policy for "kids playing" near the security wall, because on 10/7, a large blast (caused by explosive charges planted by "kids playing?) breached the security wall and allowed the Hamas ("Palestinian civilians") rapists, murderers, and kidnappers to storm into Israel.


Also:
"Kids playing" (near the security wall) was undoubtedly Hamas testing for weaknesses in the Israeli defenses. And when Hamas determined that the Israelis were no longer being as diligent about protecting the integrity of the security wall (due to "humanitarian" cries about the shooting of "kids playing" near the security wall?), Hamas undoubtedly (very likely) had those "kids" plant the explosives that breached the wall on 10/7.


As things turned out, it would probably (definitely) have been better if the Israelis had continued to enforce a strict “no go” policy for "kids playing" near the security wall.
Now it is what it is.


We. Told. Them. So.

Last edited: