More Winning: SCOTUS lifts order that blocked Trump's mass federal layoffs

[pinkparkhorse]

I finally had a chance to talk to my good friend about this. If you think I’m bad, she said she did a happy dance and broke out some champagne.

 

[ChloeTzang]

Only a drop in the bucket.....

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Yet the Miserables are really mad about those “mass layoffs” at the State Department.

 

[ll74]

Only a drop in the bucket.....

View attachment 2553133

Firing people by keyword search....the long tradition...

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Another big win today!

Supreme Court allows Trump to resume Education Department layoffs​

BY ZACH SCHONFELD AND LEXI LONAS COCHRAN07/14/25 03:30 PM ET

The Supreme Court on Monday allowed President Trump to resume efforts to dismantle the Department of Education in an apparent 6-3 vote along ideological lines, lifting a judge’s order to reinstate hundreds of employees terminated in mass layoffs.

The administration’s victory enables the president to move closer to fulfilling of one of his major campaign promises to oversee the elimination of the Education Department, which was created in the 1970s.

#scotus #winning #PromisesKept


https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5400461-supreme-court-education-department-layoffs/

 

[pinkparkhorse]

Another big win today!

Supreme Court allows Trump to resume Education Department layoffs​

BY ZACH SCHONFELD AND LEXI LONAS COCHRAN07/14/25 03:30 PM ET

The Supreme Court on Monday allowed President Trump to resume efforts to dismantle the Department of Education in an apparent 6-3 vote along ideological lines, lifting a judge’s order to reinstate hundreds of employees terminated in mass layoffs.

The administration’s victory enables the president to move closer to fulfilling of one of his major campaign promises to oversee the elimination of the Education Department, which was created in the 1970s.

#scotus #winning #PromisesKept


https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5400461-supreme-court-education-department-layoffs/

I love this. Makes me so happy.

 

[PaxNurgle]

Thats because you obviously don't have kids.

Which in itself, isn't too surprising.
Not too many women out there would want some incel pintler man to have their baby.

 

[ChinoMoreno]

The only Justice opposed of course was Ketanji "I'm Not A Biologist, So How Would I know What a Woman is" Jackson.

Ugh. She’s such an unqualified twit.

DEI hire. Her wordy questions and baseless dissents are embarrassing to read and hear. With her, it’s always about emotion, how things ought to be, not how they are. Her reasoning constantly drifts into the political, even when her role as a Supreme Court justice demands constitutional restraint. Even Justice Sotomayor, hardly a strict constructionist, distances herself in this decision.

She doesn’t seem to grasp, or chooses to ignore, the constitutional limits placed on the Court. She sees herself not as an interpreter of law, but as an agent of change. In her view, the Court exists to assist unelected lower court judges in expanding judicial power, power that can then be used to override the will of the people and undermine the very constitutional framework that protects that will, all in pursuit of some abstract “greater good.”

Hey bros it's always the same suspects when it comes to women and especially women of colour.

 

[PaxNurgle]

What bothers me is, people who say that Trump is winning, or is handed wins from the highly suspect and compromised kangaroo supreme court- well, these "Wins" for Trump almost always amount to losses for the people and for the country. Yes, he got these wins. So did Kim Jong Un and his predecessors. Was those wins good for their citizens? Are Trump's wins good for America's?

In most cases, NO!

I wish more people would look at it that way.