U.S. Institute of Peace v Jackson Was Another Massive Victory For Trump

[Rightguide]

Federal Appeals Court Ruling Sides With Trump’s Plans To Dismantle Institute Of Peace​

Melanie WilcoxContributor
June 28, 20257:24 PM ET

A federal appeals court Friday lifted a lower court’s order that blocked President Donald Trump from moving forward with efforts to dismantle the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP).

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that Trump is likely to suffer “irreparable” harm if barred from fully exercising his executive authority over the Institute’s board. The court concluded that the Institute holds “substantial executive power,” meaning its board members are not protected from at-will removal by the president.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1938597851333804383

https://dailycaller.com/2025/06/28/...trumps-plans-to-dismantle-institute-of-peace/

The Deep State just took another blow to its pretended "independent" authority.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Deep State

Drink!

Where's Soros?

BTW, have you figured out that you're the one supporting what is the real "deep state" these days?

Probably not because you're a fucking simp for this reactive fascist regime.

 

[PintlerMan]

All this winning, it's like you libs, should listen to what our side says, because it's all coming true, and all your fantasy's are just wrong, it's because you are the "Educated" lol voters...hahahhahhahha ed u ma kated

 

[Rightguide]

Here’s yet another smackdown from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reaffirming the President’s exclusive Article II authority over the Executive Branch. The case involved Susan Tsui Grundmann of the Federal Labor Relations Authority, who claimed she operated independently of presidential oversight. In a decision handed down on July 3, 2035, the court ruled decisively that Congress lacks the power to create "independent" executive agencies that exercise real executive authority. Citing Trump v. Wilcox, 145 S. Ct. 1415 (2025) (per curiam), the ruling underscored that all executive power is vested solely in the President, no exceptions, no carve-outs, no bureaucratic escapism. It's another nail in the coffin of the administrative state's illusion of autonomy:

"In analogous removal cases involving the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board, the Supreme Court stayed orders similar to the one at issue here. See Trump v. Wilcox, 145 S. Ct. 1415 (2025) (per curiam). The Court did so based on its conclusions that the NLRB and MSPB “exercise considerable executive power” and that “the Government faces greater risk of harm from an order allowing a removed officer to continue exercising the executive power than a wrongfully removed officer faces from being unable to perform her statutory duty.” Id. at 1415.The Supreme Court’s reasoning fully applies to the FLRA, which possesses powers substantially similar to those of the NLRB. Compare 5 U.S.C. § 7104 et seq., with 29 U.S.C. § 153 et seq."

 

[DeluxAuto]

Here’s yet another smackdown from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reaffirming the President’s exclusive Article II authority over the Executive Branch. The case involved Susan Tsui Grundmann of the Federal Labor Relations Authority, who claimed she operated independently of presidential oversight. In a decision handed down on July 3, 2035, the court ruled decisively that Congress lacks the power to create "independent" executive agencies that exercise real executive authority. Citing Trump v. Wilcox, 145 S. Ct. 1415 (2025) (per curiam), the ruling underscored that all executive power is vested solely in the President, no exceptions, no carve-outs, no bureaucratic escapism. It's another nail in the coffin of the administrative state's illusion of autonomy:

"In analogous removal cases involving the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board, the Supreme Court stayed orders similar to the one at issue here. See Trump v. Wilcox, 145 S. Ct. 1415 (2025) (per curiam). The Court did so based on its conclusions that the NLRB and MSPB “exercise considerable executive power” and that “the Government faces greater risk of harm from an order allowing a removed officer to continue exercising the executive power than a wrongfully removed officer faces from being unable to perform her statutory duty.” Id. at 1415.The Supreme Court’s reasoning fully applies to the FLRA, which possesses powers substantially similar to those of the NLRB. Compare 5 U.S.C. § 7104 et seq., with 29 U.S.C. § 153 et seq."

Wanting to give a covicted felon (FOR FRAUD) all the power he can possibly have, damn morals and what is good for the entire Country, makes you a peasant to a dictator.

Plus, you're a coward who needs to be led by weak men.

 

[Rightguide]

Wanting someone a convicted felon to give him as much power as he can possibly have, damn morals and what is good for the entire Country, makes you a peasant to a dictator.

Plus, you're a coward who needs to be led by weak men.

Since the beginning, I've led the way, and you have followed, just like now. So, let me take the time to school you again. As of now (early July 2025), Judge Merchan has not entered the formal judgment of conviction because sentencing is scheduled for July 11, 2025. Under CPL § 1.20(15), a person becomes formally "convicted" only after the judgment of conviction is entered by the court.

So What Does This Mean?

Technically, under New York criminal procedure, Donald Trump has not yet been formally "convicted" until Judge Merchan enters judgment on July 11. So, until he does enter that judgement of conviction, he is not yet a convicted felon.

So, what does that mean?

It means that up until then you're full of shit. Now go peddle your papers like a good little boy.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Do you think it's finally sinking in that there is NO independent agency in the government.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Wanting to give a covicted felon (FOR FRAUD) all the power he can possibly have, damn morals and what is good for the entire Country, makes you a peasant to a dictator.

Plus, you're a coward who needs to be led by weak men.

You're a fucking moron.

 

[DeluxAuto]

You're a fucking moron.

You're a traitor who gave up everything you've ever believed in for a 2-bit circus barker.

I win.

 

[Rightguide]

Do you think it's finally sinking in that there is NO independent agency in the government.

I would think so, but we are dealing with the entrenched, unelected administrative state desperately trying to hold on to its power. A couple more whacks between their eyes with legal 2X4s might yet be required.

 

[DeluxAuto]

So, what does that mean?

It means 12 actual Americans found him guilty of defrauding your stupid ass, dipshit.

 

[Rebel5soul]

I would think so, but we are dealing with the entrenched, unelected administrative state desperately trying to hold on to its power. A couple more whacks between their eyes with legal 2X4s might yet be required.

I think Powell is going to be the next to fall.

 

[DeluxAuto]

unelected administrative state desperately trying to hold on to its power.

Enough about the failed DOGE fiasco. Move on, loser.

 

[Rightguide]

You're a fucking moron.

Yep, at the journeyman level as well.

 

[Rightguide]

I think Powell is going to be the next to fall.

I think you're right. I read where Trump is actively seeking his replacement.

 

[ll74]

Best way for Trump.to.tank the markets is to oust Powell.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Best way for Trump.to.tank the markets is to oust Powell.

Listening to the "experts" again huh? Maybe they'll be right some day.

 

[Rightguide]

Best way for Trump.to.tank the markets is to oust Powell.

You mean like how the economy was going to collapse if Trump was elected?

 

[Rebel5soul]

You mean like how the economy was going to collapse if Trump was elected?

Or how inflation was going to spiral out of control with the tariffs?

Quite frankly the "experts" have been negative indicators so far.

 

[Rebel5soul]

The courts just slapped down the crybabies over at the NLRB that Trump fired.

 

[ll74]

You mean like how the economy was going to collapse if Trump was elected?

Nope.

 

[HisArpy]

You mean like how the economy was going to collapse if Trump was elected?

Don't forget about how tariffs were going to do that too.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Listening to the "experts" again huh? Maybe they'll be right some day.

A lifetime proponent of "Ignorance Is Strength"
Say it, you old coot. Loud and proud....
EDUCATION BAD!
EDUCATION BAD!
EDUCATION BAD!

When the octogenarian obliviot Ishmael passe's away, the one single word you will not see in his obituary would be "untimely". Ishmael and his mindset are still on the shelf long after their expiration date".

 

[dmallord]

Since the beginning, I've led the way, and you have followed, just like now. So, let me take the time to school you again. As of now (early July 2025), Judge Merchan has not entered the formal judgment of conviction because sentencing is scheduled for July 11, 2025. Under CPL § 1.20(15), a person becomes formally "convicted" only after the judgment of conviction is entered by the court.

So What Does This Mean?

Technically, under New York criminal procedure, Donald Trump has not yet been formally "convicted" until Judge Merchan enters judgment on July 11. So, until he does enter that judgement of conviction, he is not yet a convicted felon.

So, what does that mean?

It means that up until then you're full of shit. Now go peddle your papers like a good little boy.

So you've staked your victory on a procedural footnote—congrats, I suppose.

Yes, under CPL §1.20(15), the formal judgment of conviction isn’t entered until sentencing, and that’s scheduled for July 11. That means, in the narrowest legal sense, the paperwork isn’t complete. But let’s not pretend this changes the facts already on the table.

A jury—twelve citizens, not partisan pundits—found Donald Trump guilty on 34 felony counts. The verdict wasn’t ambiguous. It wasn’t theoretical. It was delivered in open court, entered into the record, and accepted by the judge. That’s a conviction in every meaningful sense, and no amount of procedural hair-splitting changes that reality.

If this is the hill you want to stand on—that Trump isn’t technically a felon until the ink dries—fine. But it’s not the argument of someone defending principle. It’s the argument of someone clinging to a thread while the whole garment unravels.

So no, you're not “schooling” anyone here. You’re just broadcasting that, when faced with the weight of the verdict, you’d rather retreat into semantics than deal with what the jury already made clear: Trump is a convicted felon.

 

[Rightguide]

A lifetime proponent of "Ignorance Is Strength"
Say it, you old coot. Loud and proud....
EDUCATION BAD!
EDUCATION BAD!
EDUCATION BAD!

When the octogenarian obliviot Ishmael passe's away, the one single word you will not see in his obituary would be "untimely". Ishmael and his mindset are still on the shelf long after their expiration date".

Traditional education is good. Anti-American/Commie indoctrination preferred by Rhonda "Randi" Weingarten is bad. It creates hateful people like you.