Challenge to Lit Deplorables: cite examples of Democrat "extremists" posting here "on a daily basis"

[Lance_Castro]

How about today? Any Dem extremists around?

Just you so far!
Lol

 

[Politruk]

Thing is, Democrat "extremists" are mostly concerned with culture-war issues -- and the most extreme positions on those are essentially harmless, and tolerable to the PTB, as they do not threaten the distribution of wealth or the social order. Same-sex marriage is entirely compatible with capitalism.

 

[RoryN]

How we doin' for examples of "Democrat extremists" on the PB today?

Still none?

Okay. I'll keep asking.

 

[SluttyTheresa]

No examples so far.

Shocker.

Remember that they are POORLY EDUCATED. Can't read or write

 

[Saint_Ann]

How we doin' for examples of "Democrat extremists" on the PB today?

Still none?

Okay. I'll keep asking.

Dead thread bumping.

 

[RoryN]

How we doin' for examples of "Democrat extremists" on the PB today?

Still none?

Okay. I'll keep asking.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Not even rorythesnitch's alts will talk to him anymore.

 

[RoryN]

There are extremists in both parties. We see it play out here on a daily basis.

So, to be 100% clear: this was a lie.

 

[Saint_Ann]

So, to be 100% clear: this was a lie.

You should report him for "allegedly lying".

 

[RoryN]

Ah, there it is. A predictable semantics argument about what "extremist" means has apparently begun.

Semantics arguments happen when someone doesn't like the truth that's been presented, and seeks to undermine it in a dishonest way.

This thread is triggering nicely.

 

[RoryN]

Mid-morning fun bump!

 

[Lazaran]

That was almost simultaneous posting, above!

Rent-free in my Lit stalker's head for over a decade.

You ARE the king of triggering MAGAts.

Good thing “No Kings” only applies to American governance.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Ah, there it is. A predictable semantics argument about what "extremist" means has apparently begun.

Semantics arguments happen when someone doesn't like the truth that's been presented, and seeks to undermine it in a dishonest way.

This thread is triggering nicely.

Trigger, please!

 

[Saint_Ann]

5 pages of rorythesnitch bumping a dead thread is pretty extreme. Did I use that word correctly?

 

[RoryN]

Fun bumpy!

Any examples?

 

[Typo Fu Master]

Extra fun bumpy that actually contributes to the topic and is worth reading.

1. Saint Ann rightfully makes fun of you.

2. The best part about the threads you create are other people's responses.

3. I triggered you so much you made a thread about it.

 

[RoryN]

Saint Ann rightfully makes fun of you.

The only members who praise that troll are the ones who cry "everywhere!" when asked "where did Rory hurt you?"

And there's maybe 2 of them; even the regular Deplorables steer clear. You're now in rare company.

 

[Saint_Ann]

The only members who praise that troll are the ones who cry "everywhere!" when asked "where did Rory hurt you?"

And there's maybe 2 of them; even the regular Deplorables steer clear. You're now in rare company.

Only a narcissist worries about what other people think of them.

 

[Typo Fu Master]

3. I triggered you so much you made a thread about it.

 

[RoryN]

This thread continues to trigger quite nicely.

 

[Saint_Ann]

This thread continues to trigger quite nicely.

Triggering you, lol.

 

[RoryN]

So many triggered Deplorables. Still zero proof of the false "Democrat extremists posting here on a daily basis".

Exposing this particular lie seems to make them very angry.

 

[coati]

Nope, there are still no left wing extremists posting in this forum on a daily basis. Just regular people resisting MAGAt insanity.

 

[Saint_Ann]

We'll all be waiting breathlessly for you to bump this dead thread in another day or two. And you can have your sock puppet coathanger parrot your words of wisdom.

 

[RoryN]

Nope, there are still no left wing extremists posting in this forum on a daily basis. Just regular people resisting MAGAt insanity.

Yep. Sure looks that way to me too.