Trump Labels NYC’s Mamdani A ‘100% Communist Lunatic’

He's thirty-three years old and thinks that state-owned grocery stores are the answer.
City-owned, not state-owned. And the idea here is simply that not starving to death is a basic human right. What's wrong with that?
He thinks that defunding the police will benefit NYC.
It would benefit most cities, including NYC.
He thinks taxing "white people" more than others of different skin color is legal and will solve the economic woes of NYC.
That's not quite what he said. He called for shifting the tax burden to more affluent neighborhoods, which he correctly said were whiter. But the point isn't really racial, it's about shifting the burden to those who are better able to afford it - and that idea is popular in NYC, even among the people who would end up paying more in taxes.
This man has no business occupying any official office in the United States.
New York is not Idaho. Get over it.
 
Where did he say he lied? I’m seriously asking questions.
Here. Use your brain for something other than being annoying.

Go to page 6, starting at "have you ever." I wonder how the Communist Mandani answered those questions.

https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/forms/n-400.pdf
Not only is Rightguide saying he lied, he's falsely accusing him of being a communist because Rightguide labels anyone who disagrees with his racism, a communist.
 
He is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America. The difference between a socialist and a communist is only a matter of degree. The leftist refrain goes something like this; “He’s not a communist, he just wants the government to control your housing, your transportation, your food supply, and your income. Totally different.” Yeah, not by much.

His proposal of government-run grocery stores is rooted in centrally planned economics that bear a striking resemblance to failed communist policies, particularly those of the Soviet Union. The fact that Zohran Mamdani promotes state-owned food distribution in a city with thousands of private options isn't just economically naïve, it's historically blind. It’s not democratic socialism. It’s bureaucrat-run scarcity with a PR team.
A Communist believes that a dictatorship is an acceptable government for a socialist economy. A democratic socialist disagrees. That is a critical difference between them. A democratic socialist is likely to think that Karl Marx had a few valid insights, but that he made major mistakes. A Communist sees no mistakes in the writing of Marx.

A Communist believes that the Russian Revolution of 1917 was an important step forward. A democratic socialist believes that the Russian Revolution was a tragic mistake and a wrong turn for the international left.
 
City-owned, not state-owned. And the idea here is simply that not starving to death is a basic human right. What's wrong with that?

It would benefit most cities, including NYC.

That's not quite what he said. He called for shifting the tax burden to more affluent neighborhoods, which he correctly said were whiter. But the point isn't really racial, it's about shifting the burden to those who are better able to afford it - and that idea is popular in NYC, even among the people who would end up paying more in taxes.

New York is not Idaho. Get over it.
Basically punishing success, believing wealth inequality can be remedied by wealth redistribution. That will only work till the givers run out of wealth and become takers.
 
Basically punishing success, believing wealth inequality can be remedied by wealth redistribution. That will only work till the givers run out of wealth and become takers.
We really should have a thread about solutions to problems- homelessness, food insecurity, etc. One topic per thread.
 
Here. Use your brain for something other than being annoying.
Oh no, a man called a woman annoying. Fake tears. Sarcasm. Where did I intentionally be annoying by the way?
Not only is Rightguide saying he lied, he's falsely accusing him of being a communist because Rightguide labels anyone who disagrees with his racism, a communist.
Thank you! No sarcasm.
 
Basically punishing success, believing wealth inequality can be remedied by wealth redistribution. That will only work till the givers run out of wealth and become takers.
If I ever see an investment banker begging in the street, then I'll consider your point of view.
 
We really should have a thread about solutions to problems- homelessness, food insecurity, etc. One topic per thread.
Many here believe their moral altruistic approach will carry the day, a day of total self destruction.
 
Oh no, a man called a woman annoying. Fake tears. Sarcasm. Where did I intentionally be annoying by the way?
It has nothing to do with you being a woman. Quit with your fake tears about people being misogynistic and antisemitic. Or, go back to the Playground where they embrace your type.
 
Many here believe their moral altruistic approach will carry the day, a day of total self destruction.
As opposed to fiscal austerity, which has never once benefitted anyone but the rich?
 
It has nothing to do with you being a woman. Quit with your fake tears about people being misogynistic and antisemitic. Or, go back to the Playground where they embrace your type.
Do you have a problem with Playgrounders on the PB? You realize you’re talking politics on LitEROTICA?

I didn’t call you antisemitic or mysogynistic, both do exist here and in real life though.
 
It has nothing to do with you being a woman. Quit with your fake tears about people being misogynistic and antisemitic. Or, go back to the Playground where they embrace your type.
And fyi, if you find me annoying you can put me on ignore.
 
Back
Top