Trump Labels NYC’s Mamdani A ‘100% Communist Lunatic’

[SgtSpiderMan]

He's thirty-three years old and thinks that state-owned grocery stores are the answer. He thinks that defunding the police will benefit NYC. He thinks taxing "white people" more than others of different skin color is legal and will solve the economic woes of NYC. This man has no business occupying any official office in the United States.

Because he hasn’t committed any felonies?

 

[AnomalyLady]

He's thirty-three years old and thinks that state-owned grocery stores are the answer. He thinks that defunding the police will benefit NYC. He thinks taxing "white people" more than others of different skin color is legal and will solve the economic woes of NYC. This man has no business occupying any official office in the United States.

I think Rob should answer some questions about his origins, my suggestion.

 

[AnomalyLady]

Because he hasn’t committed any felonies?

We’re talking about Rob. How does that connect?

 

[Rightguide]

Side note, if someone doesn’t believe in G-d, what do they care saying, “So help me G-d?”

Torcaso v. Watkins (1961): The Supreme Court ruled that belief in God cannot be a requirement for holding public office, reinforcing the broader principle that religious belief (or lack thereof) cannot be a legal requirement for civic participation. There’s no legal obligation to affirm belief in God during the U.S. naturalization oath. Saying the words, "so help me God" is not an affirmation of a belief in God. I guess they just have to get over it.

 

[Pad_Foot]

Now that Mamdani has been labeled 100% Communist can ICE throw him out if the country as MAGAts suggested??

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

We’re talking about Rob. How does that connect?

I wasn’t talking about Rob.

 

[AnomalyLady]

I wasn’t talking about Rob.

Never mind then

 

[ll74]

None of that matters if he lied on his citizenship application. No Communist, no Hamas supporter, can take the following oath and be telling the truth:

Lol..of course

"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."

 

[AnomalyLady]

Lol..of course

What part do you disagree with?

 

[ll74]

What part do you disagree with?

It doesn't matter as it's a bullshit hypothetical that can't be proven. How would you prove that one out?

Also support for other countries or people isn't the same as allegiance to that country.

 

[Rightguide]

I think Rob should answer some questions about his origins, my suggestion.

Rob is a grouchy old time capsule, a mentally calcified echo chamber, and the last surviving disciple of the Vetteman mythology. He's a grumbling old relic with one foot in the grave and the other stuck in the 1950s.

 

[AnomalyLady]

It doesn't matter as it's a bullshit hypothetical that can't be proven. How would you prove that one out?

Also support for other countries or people isn't the same as allegiance to that country.

Prove that Mamdani took the oath?

 

[ll74]

Prove that Mamdani took the oath?

That's not what he is asserting. He's claiming that he lied when taking the oath.

 

[Saint_Ann]

I can see New Yorkers telling him to get fucked.

 

[ll74]

I can see New Yorkers telling him to get fucked.

As mentioned previously, city council will tell him that, which is what matters.

 

[Saint_Ann]

As mentioned previously, city council will tell him that, which is what matters.

Won't matter if no one votes for him either.

 

[Rightguide]

It doesn't matter as it's a bullshit hypothetical that can't be proven. How would you prove that one out?

Also support for other countries or people isn't the same as allegiance to that country.

Go to page 6, starting at "have you ever." I wonder how the Communist Mandani answered those questions.

https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/forms/n-400.pdf

 

[AnomalyLady]

That's not what he is asserting. He's claiming that he lied when taking the oath.

What part of the oath?

 

[icanhelp1]

We’re talking about Rob. How does that connect?

PVT2dungbeetle suffers from TDS

 

[icanhelp1]

Go to page 6, starting at "have you ever." I wonder how the Communist Mandani answered those questions.

https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/forms/n-400.pdf

If he used the name Mandani on his application he's in deep shit.

 

[ll74]

Go to page 6, starting at "have you ever." I wonder how the Communist Mandani answered those questions.

https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/forms/n-400.pdf

Yes, I know that you believe that he lied.

And as I said....it's horseshit based on your bias that can't and won't ever be proven.

He's an American.... Sorry that you don't like that.

 

[ll74]

What part of the oath?

Maybe you should be asking him these questions. I'm not here to explain his arguments to you

 

[John_von_Neumann]

Judging by vetteman's thread, Mamdani scares the shit out of the PB's trumptards.

 

[Rightguide]

Yes, I know that you believe that he lied.

And as I said....it's horseshit based on your bias that can't and won't ever be proven.

He's an American.... Sorry that you don't like that.

Where did I say he lied? Why did you lie about what I believe? Are you clairvoyant? Do you think you're clairvoyant?

 

[ll74]

Where did I say he lied? Why did you lie about what I believe? Are you clairvoyant?

So your argument is that he lied on his application.

Based on what evidence?