ChloeTzang
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2015
- Posts
- 16,651
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looked like the US blew its chance to influence a quick and decisive Ukraine victory in the early days of the war by waffling over what weapons to provide and how they could be used.
Looked like the US blew its chance to influence a quick and decisive Ukraine victory in the early days of the war by waffling over what weapons to provide and how they could be used.
But that’s water under the bridge. Given geopolitical realities, when does this war end?
Looked like the US blew its chance to influence a quick and decisive Ukraine victory in the early days of the war by waffling over what weapons to provide and how they could be used.
Biden was president when Russia invaded Ukraine in February, 2022. He left office nearly 3 years later in January, 2025 with no end to the war in sight.Trump praised Putin in the early days of the invasion. No waffling from him. He’s always been solidly behind Russia.
Biden was president when Russia invaded Ukraine in February, 2022. He left office nearly 3 years later in January, 2025 with no end to the war in sight.
You’re welcome to take a shot at answering the question I asked Chloe. She demurred. Given the geopolitical realities, when (and how) does this war end?
The U.S. absolutely missed its chance early on. A decisive Ukrainian victory may have been possible if we hadn't spent the first critical months debating which weapons to send—and what strings to attach. That hesitation cost lives and momentum. And yes, Biden tried to balance support without provoking escalation, but walking a tightrope in a burning house rarely works.Looked like the US blew its chance to influence a quick and decisive Ukraine victory in the early days of the war by waffling over what weapons to provide and how they could be used.
But that’s water under the bridge. Given geopolitical realities, when does this war end?
Yeah. Biden blew it intially, by not giving Ukraine enough weapos up front.
That’s likely to be years.Seriously, when Russia collapse, Putin eats a lead pill or dies, and the Russians are forced to withdraw from Ukraine (economic or military collapse) and the Russian Federation disintegrates, as it will.
The U.S. absolutely missed its chance early on. A decisive Ukrainian victory may have been possible if we hadn't spent the first critical months debating which weapons to send—and what strings to attach. That hesitation cost lives and momentum. And yes, Biden tried to balance support without provoking escalation, but walking a tightrope in a burning house rarely works.
He had congressional backing in the early stages. He should’ve used it to apply maximum pressure: surge Ukraine with the weapons they needed then, not months later, and lock down Russia’s economy with sanctions that bit deep. He didn’t—and that hesitation is on him. But the blame doesn’t end there. NATO’s leading European nations also played it safe, hiding behind caution while Ukraine fought for survival.
As for Trump—the so-called “president of peace”—he's been anything but. In the face of an unprovoked invasion by America’s adversary, he chose narcissism over principle. He floated mafia-style demands, dangled aid like ransom, and cut support when Ukraine didn’t bow. That isn’t diplomacy. It’s extortion.
Putin, for his part, misread nearly everything—Ukraine’s will to resist, his own army’s readiness, and the new shape of modern warfare. His economy is now in a slow freefall, and his battlefield strategy has devolved into attrition and desperation.
This war won’t end until Europe stops relying on the U.S. to carry the burden and starts leading. The EU must step out of the American shadow and fully arm Ukraine, not just to survive but to win. Because one thing’s clear: help won’t come from the "defender of peace." He’s too busy defending himself against tariffs and immigrants while seeking self-enrichment.
That’s likely to be years.
President Biden could NOT just unilaterally give Ukraine “enough weapons up front”.
Biden fucked it up even before the Russians invaded. His statement2026 or 2027 likely.
Biden had congressional backing from the GOP in the early stages., enought that they approved billions that Biden never used. There was no objection to seneding old Brad;eys or Strykers or F16's or HIMARS or even Patriots. What there was, was timidity and fear in the White House, an ongoing fixation on giving Putin an off-ramp that it was blatanty obvious he would never use except under way ,ore pressure that was exerted, milquetoast sanctions to start with, and an ongoing fear that Ukraine would "win". US aid was feeble at best, always late, and mever enough.
On the other hand, at least Biden supported Ukraine - but he, or I should say his "advisors" who actually ran the country, because 's more and more obvious that Biden was just a figurehead who had little grasp as to what was actually going on, tried to use Ukraine to play internal US politics to hurt the GOP with. They did this at a time when they should have been cementing bipartisan support for Ukraine and floodimg the country with US military air - and at low costs too - all those old Bradley's at book value were next to nothing, Instead they used Ukraine Air as a Democrat boondoglle, siphoning off god knws how many billions by boking them air sent at replacement cost" - and not replacing them. So what happened to that money? Of course the GOP quislings backed that bullshit - boondoggles all round - the military-industrial complex is entrenched in the Senate - but Biden played it for all it was worth, as well as destroying whatever consensus existed (and still exists - witness the Graham Blumenthal bill on sanctions), and actively sabotaging aid for Ukraone at a crucual moment when Russia was attacking.
Both sides come out stinking of shit in this. Between Biden and Trump, they have turned what should not be our closest friend in Europe and a firm ally and trading partner for the next hundred years into a country that now regards the USA as a bunch of back-stabbing assholes who have betrayed them again and again - and they'd be right. We've also turned the EU against us very successfully. Their leaders will all make kissy face, but you can pretty much bet that Europe is done with the USA as an ally once they are standing on their own two feet militarily. We'll see a tripartite power structure emerge - China-Europe-USA, with Japan, South Korea, Australia and Canada aligning with the EU rather than the USA
Trumo's sucessor as President (likely to be Vance, because Democrats are doubling down on the idiocy rather than seeing the light) will cement that, likely irrevocably
You just can't help yourself can you? TDS on steroids.The U.S. absolutely missed its chance early on. A decisive Ukrainian victory may have been possible if we hadn't spent the first critical months debating which weapons to send—and what strings to attach. That hesitation cost lives and momentum. And yes, Biden tried to balance support without provoking escalation, but walking a tightrope in a burning house rarely works.
He had congressional backing in the early stages. He should’ve used it to apply maximum pressure: surge Ukraine with the weapons they needed then, not months later, and lock down Russia’s economy with sanctions that bit deep. He didn’t—and that hesitation is on him. But the blame doesn’t end there. NATO’s leading European nations also played it safe, hiding behind caution while Ukraine fought for survival.
As for Trump—the so-called “president of peace”—he's been anything but. In the face of an unprovoked invasion by America’s adversary, he chose narcissism over principle. He floated mafia-style demands, dangled aid like ransom, and cut support when Ukraine didn’t bow. That isn’t diplomacy. It’s extortion.
Putin, for his part, misread nearly everything—Ukraine’s will to resist, his own army’s readiness, and the new shape of modern warfare. His economy is now in a slow freefall, and his battlefield strategy has devolved into attrition and desperation.
This war won’t end until Europe stops relying on the U.S. to carry the burden and starts leading. The EU must step out of the American shadow and fully arm Ukraine, not just to survive but to win. Because one thing’s clear: help won’t come from the "defender of peace." He’s too busy defending himself against tariffs and immigrants while seeking self-enrichment.
Umm.....guy who used caps lock, colors and underlines to express his feelings about Biden has this to say about someone discussing Trump in regular fontBiden fucked it up even before the Russians invaded. His statement
"DON'T"
was laughable on it's face!!
Putin knew Biden was an extension of Obama's appeasement and apology agenda.
Hell, Biden wouldn't shoot back even when the houthis were shooting at our troops
LmaoYou just can't help yourself can you? TDS on steroids.
Because people like Ducky and Laz, and in some cases you, just refuse to hold Biden accountable for anything.Umm.....guy who used caps lock, colors and underlines to express his feelings about Biden has this to say about someone discussing Trump in regular font
Lmao
LMAO...some self reflection here is warranted for ya.Because people like Ducky and Laz, and in some cases you, just refuse to hold Biden accountable for anything.
You just can't help yourself can you? TDS on steroids.
And he wasn't in charge of anything. It's more and more obvious, eben to the blind, that he wasn't even in charge of changing his own diapers.Biden was weak. And old.
Sane people: “Trump praised Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, right from the start.”
MAGA sheep: “Biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiden! Biiiiiiiden! Biiiiiden is old!”
Provide a direct quote or STFU.Sane people: “Trump praised Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, right from the start.”
MAGA sheep: “Biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiden! Biiiiiiiden! Biiiiiden is old!”