SCOTUS puts an end

[eric_erosfan]

Read the decision in full.

Actually listened to a few pundits on the Left saying they agreed with it. That it was time conservative judges from Texas didn't make crazy decisions that affected the entire country.

 

[HisArpy]

why don't YOU fuck off, Hisarpy. Incidently, You've posted Thirty Six times in this thread by my count. Plus a forum-record seven posts in a row; that beats any posting spasm Politruk and Brains n' Boobs ever did. Maybe you should get a life and go live your dystopian dictatorshit fantasies somewhere other than the U.S. while we freedom loving patriots continue to fight for our liberties.

There is no getting around that this is a horrible decision, for America and for individual freedoms. For one, it now exposes people who were born in the U.S., grew up here, and placed roots here, to have their citizenship stripped away, and deported to some hellhole prison in Djamaica or wherever that place is, simply because their parents were not. This should never be allowed in a free society. And it proves that if the court can single handedly dismiss the 14th Amendment and over 150 years of precedent, they can just as easily dismiss the 2nd amendment and have cops go door to door confiscating guns (without even a search warrant.) You don't think so? There is no longer ANY GUARANTEE of rights being protected.

While it is a dark day for America, it is an even darker day for the millions of CITIZENS who now face deportation.

^somebody is having themselves a conniption because his lies are falling faster than raindrops in a Cat 5 hurricane.

Great job!

 

[Rebel5soul]

!!!AHEM!!!

<-- is an Ass. That other guy you called an "ass" is actually an assHOLE. Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.

Watching them project a restrictive decision to the end game is...................interesting.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Just the opposite, it will only apply to the plaintiffs in the judges jurisdiction.

So you didn’t write this??

 

[Bray123]

Trump posted that the ruling means that the Constitution only applies to the circumstances at the time the Amendment was passed.

Therefore 2A only applies to black powder muskets. Or are you saying that Trump is an idiot?

 

[ll74]

back with your 8 ball again. are you a federal judge in drag?

I guarantee it will be blocked.

Either way, the EO is blocked for 30 days at least.

And, before then, a nationwide.injunction can still be enacted.

Adding - Advisory Opinions just now - Sarah Isgur - "I think it will be back within 30 days at SCOTUS " (https://pca.st/episode/fe5b0897-8fa7-4e95-a32e-35fe41ff2b45?t=533)

 

[Lance_Castro]

Another bad day for the SpiderTwats here.

Thankfully they’re gracious Losers.

Ahahahaha!

 

[Rebel5soul]

I notice that Kagan, wisely, refrained from providing a written dissent thus avoiding looking like those morons Jackson and Sotomayer who were writing dissents for a case not before the court.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

I notice that Kagan, wisely, refrained from providing a written dissent thus avoiding looking like those morons Jackson and Sotomayer who were writing dissents for a case not before the court.

LOL! The opinions that they wrote that you agreed with.

 

[Rebel5soul]

You're fucking delusional.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

You're fucking delusional.

Ah, the old AJ defense of “I didn’t say what I was directly quoted saying”.
Keep in mind this ruling will make it easier for the government to take your guns.

 

[Lance_Castro]

Poor Spider Twat.

https://forum.literotica.com/threads/casual-encounters-on-craigslist.523144/

 

[eric_erosfan]

Poor Spider Twat.

He seems to be doing just fine.

You on the other hand Pedro must be upset about that 1,000 feet from any school order.

 

[Rightguide]

She has expressed an opinion based on an assumption. Clearly she is an activist, not a judge...............but we already knew that.

Recall that she is the self-proclaimed "wise Latina."

why don't YOU fuck off, Hisarpy. Incidently, You've posted Thirty Six times in this thread by my count. Plus a forum-record seven posts in a row; that beats any posting spasm Politruk and Brains n' Boobs ever did. Maybe you should get a life and go live your dystopian dictatorshit fantasies somewhere other than the U.S. while we freedom loving patriots continue to fight for our liberties.

There is no getting around that this is a horrible decision, for America and for individual freedoms. For one, it now exposes people who were born in the U.S., grew up here, and placed roots here, to have their citizenship stripped away, and deported to some hellhole prison in Djamaica or wherever that place is, simply because their parents were not. This should never be allowed in a free society. And it proves that if the court can single handedly dismiss the 14th Amendment and over 150 years of precedent, they can just as easily dismiss the 2nd amendment and have cops go door to door confiscating guns (without even a search warrant.) You don't think so? There is no longer ANY GUARANTEE of rights being protected.

While it is a dark day for America, it is an even darker day for the millions of CITIZENS who now face deportation.

Cry harder. It's the right decision.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Recall that she is the self-proclaimed "wise Latina."

Cry harder. It's the right decision.

How hard will you cry when the government takes your guns?

 

[Rightguide]

And moves us toward fascism

That's juvenile BS.

 

[Lance_Castro]

How hard will you cry when the government takes your guns?

Poor Spider Twat, nobody listens to you.

Maybe you need to go downtown?


https://forum.literotica.com/threads/making-out-with-strangers.517154/

 

[Rebel5soul]

Let's recap this thread.

1. It's about the SCOTUS decision to virtually strip trial court judge of the ability to issue nationwide injunctions. That's all that was decided yesterday.

2. No one's rights have been taken away...............period.

That being said, I cannot take responsibility for those in this thread that are hallucinating. Perhaps those individuals should re-evaluate their pharmaceutical ingestion policy.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Let's recap this thread.

1. It's about the SCOTUS decision to virtually strip trial court judge of the ability to issue nationwide injunctions. That's all that was decided yesterday.

2. No one's rights have been taken away...............period.

That being said, I cannot take responsibility for those in this thread that are hallucinating. Perhaps those individuals should re-evaluate their pharmaceutical ingestion policy.

LOL! You understand the ruling but you’re freaking out because it’s been shown to you that this will make it so easy for the government to take your guns since there can’t be a nationwide injunction to stop the government from doing it.

 

[Lance_Castro]

LOL! You understand the ruling but you’re freaking out because it’s been shown to you that this will make it so easy for the government to take your guns since there can’t be a nationwide injunction to stop the government from doing it.

Poor Spider Twat.

Can’t handle his shrooms.

Lol

 

[eric_erosfan]

LOL! You understand the ruling but you’re freaking out because it’s been shown to you that this will make it so easy for the government to take your guns since there can’t be a nationwide injunction to stop the government from doing it.

That is the funny part of this ruling. Different courts will decide differently depending on the area of the country.

Trump will issue an EO declaring slavery legal again. Northern courts will issue an injunction for northern states. Southern courts will do nothing and once again you have slavery in the South and freedom in the North.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

That is the funny part of this ruling. Different courts will decide differently depending on the area of the country.

Trump will issue an EO declaring slavery legal again. Northern courts will issue an injunction for northern states. Southern courts will do nothing and once again you have slavery in the South and freedom in the North.

All the courts could say exactly the same thing. But until the court in that person’s individual district issues an injunction the government can keep on taking guns.

 

[Baztrachian]

What you don't seem to understand that Justice Roberts does is that NONE of those inferior courts are constitutionally mandated. Further, congress can cut the shit out of the Courts budget through the reconciliation process. Roberts is acutely aware of the sense of congress and how out of control some of the inferior courts are. I expect him to act out of an attempt to protect the judiciaries integrity and his own powers.

I agree. This ruling was intended to head off an even more restrictive action by a Congress that has become fed up with the judiciary declaring themselves superior to the other two branches of government.

It's come to the point where it's a joke on the web now that every human activity must first be approved by a Federal judge.

This decision dials back the notion that 1800 unelected judges can each issue national orders well outside the scope of their defined authorities and jurisdictions.

 

[Lance_Castro]

All the courts could say exactly the same thing. But until the court in that person’s individual district issues an injunction the government can keep on taking guns.

Hahaha retard alert!

 

[Bn2f]

I agree.

I think you say shit without realizing what is actually spilling from your pie hole.

This decision dials back the notion that 1800 unelected judges can each issue national orders well outside the scope of their defined authorities and jurisdictions.

This decision by an unelected court of 9 dials back the notion that unelected judges can issue orders. FYP.
Tell us again your expertise on authoritarianism.