Trump tore up Iran nuclear deal; now he wants it back

Joined
Mar 14, 2014
Posts
7,244
Doddering Donnie seems to have forgotten he tore up a nuclear deal with Iran. Now he wants a deal.

President Donald Trump sent a letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, seeking a new deal with Tehran to restrain its rapidly advancing nuclear program and replace the one he withdrew America from in his first term in office.

Trump’s announcement was made in a Fox Business News interview that was recorded on Thursday night and confirmed by the White House on Friday. There was no confirmation from Khamenei’s office that any letter had been received.

Poor Doddering Donnie. Alzheimer’s has hit him hard.
 
He also seems to have forgotten that he negotiated a free trade deal with Canada and Mexico.
 
He is that, and more.
And keep in mind that since I've been keeping track, he's currently on his NINETY SIXTH screen name.

That is not an exaggeration by the way. Seriously, Ninety six iterations of the same asshole. I would list them all but I'm too lazy and don't feel like it.

Hisarpy, by comparison, only has 26 as of now. Chad Michael "Botany Boy" Shaffer only has 12. So, they've still got a ways to go.
 
He is that, and more.
And keep in mind that since I've been keeping track, he's currently on his NINETY SIXTH screen name.

That is not an exaggeration by the way. Seriously, Ninety six iterations of the same asshole.
I'm willing to believe you -- his posting style is unmistakable.
 
Trump says he’ll bomb Iran until they restore the nuclear arms treaty he tore up

Trump also said he’s considering punishing Iran with unspecified “secondary tariffs” and raised the threat of bombing Iran until it signs a deal that renounces nuclear weapons.

“If they don’t make a deal, there will be bombing,” NBC cited Trump as saying.

Trump told Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in a recently delivered letter that his nation has a two-month deadline to reach a new nuclear accord, according to a person familiar with its content. Trump has previously suggested he could “go in militarily” if necessary to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

Donnie is a mental gimp.

tHe pEAcE preSiDEnT
 
The lack of depth of understanding of folks like you is mind-boggling until you consider the disaster that the liberal left has made of the US public education system. Trump has no plans to re-institute the disastrous, so-called "nuclear arms treaty" that Obama paid for with billions of our unmarked bills flow into Tehran in the dark of night. For those of you who choose to continue to watch only the MSM, Trump wants a treaty with teeth that says simply, "Iran will not have a nuclear weapon nor any nuclear industry capable of producing one."

C'mon man!
 
The lack of depth of understanding of folks like you is mind-boggling until you consider the disaster that the liberal left has made of the US public education system. Trump has no plans to re-institute the disastrous, so-called "nuclear arms treaty" that Obama paid for with billions of our unmarked bills flow into Tehran in the dark of night. For those of you who choose to continue to watch only the MSM, Trump wants a treaty with teeth that says simply, "Iran will not have a nuclear weapon nor any nuclear industry capable of producing one."

C'mon man!
The treaty he was going after was basically jcpoa 2.0.

You not recognizing that is your fault.
 
America will continue killing brown people around the world until they learn to love the US.

Point to note, Iran has never invaded another country (not even during the Iran-Iraq War) since the creation of that state - which was an event formed out of a coup sponsored by the US.
 
Not sure where you're getting your facts, but you are misinformed. Just sayin'.
He was planning on letting them enrich uranium.

Just saying, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about
 
Well, here's what I'm seeing:

  • Some reports suggest that the Trump administration has proposed a preliminary arrangement that would allow Iran to continue enriching uranium at low levels under specific conditions. This arrangement would involve an international consortium including Iran and Arab states manufacturing fuel for customers in the Middle East, with the goal of preventing Iran from enriching uranium to bomb-grade levels for weapons.
  • However, President Trump has also publicly stated that the U.S. will "not allow any enrichment of uranium" under a potential nuclear deal with Iran. This has caused some confusion and appears to contradict the proposal mentioned above.
  • The possibility exists that the zero-enrichment stance refers to the long-term goal or the final stage of a potential deal, while the proposal allowing low-level enrichment could be an interim measure.
Note that the ultra-reliable (NOT) NY Times is the "some reports" that suggest Trump will allow enrichment to continue. If you're counting on the NYT as your source for facts, God help you.
 
Well, here's what I'm seeing:

  • Some reports suggest that the Trump administration has proposed a preliminary arrangement that would allow Iran to continue enriching uranium at low levels under specific conditions. This arrangement would involve an international consortium including Iran and Arab states manufacturing fuel for customers in the Middle East, with the goal of preventing Iran from enriching uranium to bomb-grade levels for weapons.
  • However, President Trump has also publicly stated that the U.S. will "not allow any enrichment of uranium" under a potential nuclear deal with Iran. This has caused some confusion and appears to contradict the proposal mentioned above.
  • The possibility exists that the zero-enrichment stance refers to the long-term goal or the final stage of a potential deal, while the proposal allowing low-level enrichment could be an interim measure.
Note that the ultra-reliable (NOT) NY Times is the "some reports" that suggest Trump will allow enrichment to continue. If you're counting on the NYT as your source for facts, God help you.

Another alt.

great…

😑
 
Still waiting for someone to explain to me that if Al-Quida supporting Syria was given the complete "green light" to purchase nuclear technology from the west by aging dotard Trump why Iran appears to be the only country still left to be forbidden to develop clean efficient nuclear power for a greener world.
 
Well, here's what I'm seeing:

  • Some reports suggest that the Trump administration has proposed a preliminary arrangement that would allow Iran to continue enriching uranium at low levels under specific conditions. This arrangement would involve an international consortium including Iran and Arab states manufacturing fuel for customers in the Middle East, with the goal of preventing Iran from enriching uranium to bomb-grade levels for weapons.
  • However, President Trump has also publicly stated that the U.S. will "not allow any enrichment of uranium" under a potential nuclear deal with Iran. This has caused some confusion and appears to contradict the proposal mentioned above.
  • The possibility exists that the zero-enrichment stance refers to the long-term goal or the final stage of a potential deal, while the proposal allowing low-level enrichment could be an interim measure.
Note that the ultra-reliable (NOT) NY Times is the "some reports" that suggest Trump will allow enrichment to continue. If you're counting on the NYT as your source for facts, God help you.
Asking chatgpt is fun.


He was literally doing the same deal that was in place before.

As for what sources you find acceptable, fuck off.

https://www.steptoe.com/en/news-pub...plications-for-a-trump-iran-nuclear-deal.html
 
Asking chatgpt is fun.


He was literally doing the same deal that was in place before.

As for what sources you find acceptable, fuck off.

https://www.steptoe.com/en/news-pub...plications-for-a-trump-iran-nuclear-deal.html
Except for you and the NYT, I don't see anyone saying "He was literally doing the same deal that was in place before." But don't let me hold you back. You feel free to continue to believe whatever nonsense you want. Don't worry about actual facts...
 
Except for you and the NYT, I don't see anyone saying "He was literally doing the same deal that was in place before." But don't let me hold you back. You feel free to continue to believe whatever nonsense you want. Don't worry about actual facts...
I provided another source idiot
 
Back
Top