MusicForTheDeaf
Stealer's Wheel
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2025
- Posts
- 184
Should the US and EU supply Ukraine with nuclear weapons as well as long-range missiles that can deliver them?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They have the facilities, left over from the Soviet days.Or they could start their own nuclear weapons program.
But will Trump provide that?Ukraine has consistently shown that it can more than hold its own with Putin at standard conventional warfare. We promised to protect them if they gave up their nuclear capabilities. A nuclear escalation is not the answer, more funding and military intelligence to their aid could potentially bring Russia to its knees.
The answer to that is clearly a ‘no’. I’m advocating that regardless of it’s trump, Biden, Harris, Starmer, or Macron - any talk of nuclear weapons is a NO and NEVER.But will Trump provide that?
NO.Should the US and EU supply Ukraine with nuclear weapons as well as long-range missiles that can deliver them?
Too dangerous -- Russia has the capacity to retaliate in kind.If I was Zelensky, I would have asked the US to supply me with as many tactical nuclear warheads as possible, and would already have launched them against Russian positions, as well as into Russia itself.
Too dangerous -- Russia has the capacity to retaliate in kind.
A 1-kiloton tactical warhead launched against Moscow could send a message to Putin?Too dangerous -- Russia has the capacity to retaliate in kind.
Talk about advocating violence.A 1-kiloton tactical warhead launched against Moscow could send a message to Putin?
I'm sure they still have in place all the Cold War measures to make sure whoever survives a first strike can retaliate.A 1-kiloton tactical warhead launched against Moscow could send a message to Putin?
I don't follow stuff like this. What measures? Retaliate? I guess that means even more violence.I'm sure they still have in place all the Cold War measures to make sure whoever survives a first strike can retaliate.
It means nuking Kyiv.I don't follow stuff like this. What measures? Retaliate? I guess that means even more violence.
Ah. As I suspected. More violence.It means nuking Kyiv.
What on Earth are you talking about?Blackrock and Vanguard are hungry to DEVOUR Russia of all it's assets and resources.
Putin stands in the way of that.
This cannot be tolerated.
It's actually a remarkably honest government for that part of the world. Russia has a corruption problem that has interfered with its war effort.Knowing how corrupt Ukraine is, if NATO gave them nukes, they would probably sell them to bad-faith actors for money.