Objectification is not male chauvinism

Politruk

Loves Spam
Joined
Oct 13, 2024
Posts
18,471
Male chauvinism is the idea that men are superior to women. For a man to be a womanizer -- to pursue women as sex objects -- does not imply male superiority or female inferiority; it is simply acting on a natural instinct in an undisciplined manner.

So why does such behavior anger feminists?
 
I find it hilarious when the toxic dipshit type man will talk about "thirsty women" looking at men.

This is the group that goes to strip clubs to see naked women, watches the majority of porn, and can't see an attractive woman without acting like they've never seen one before.
 
Male chauvinism is the idea that men are superior to women. For a man to be a womanizer -- to pursue women as sex objects -- does not imply male superiority or female inferiority; it is simply acting on a natural instinct in an undisciplined manner.

So why does such behavior anger feminists?
Why does anything a woman does trigger you?

Maybe we should talk about cold male insecurity.
 
Male chauvinism is the idea that men are superior to women. For a man to be a womanizer -- to pursue women as sex objects -- does not imply male superiority or female inferiority; it is simply acting on a natural instinct in an undisciplined manner.

So why does such behavior anger feminists?
The problem is men treating women as nothing but decoration. Male desire can be hot under the right circumstances, but when panting after us gets in the way of us doing our jobs or being allowed to have opinions—that’s offensive.
 
The 1970s women's lib movement also inspired a lot of women to experiment with lesbianism -- but that's a different subject.

One feminist slogan of the time was "A woman without a man is like a fish without a bicycle." Bear in mind that at the time, it was generally assumed, in our culture, that a man can be complete in himself, but a woman needs a man to complete her. That was one of those assumptions so widespread and deeply rooted that nobody even notices it until somebody objects to it.
 
Last edited:
I remember in college, a feminist club showed a documentary called "Not a Love Story," arguing that all pornography is exploitive of women. (Gay porn was never mentioned.)
 
Yeah there is “female forward” “real couples” porn. Is it as interesting always? Naw but I’m glad it exists.
 
I remember in college, a feminist club showed a documentary called "Not a Love Story," arguing that all pornography is exploitive of women. (Gay porn was never mentioned.)
The producers make much of the fact that the word "pornography" comes from the Greek pornos -- meaning "prostitute," but they translated it as "female sexual slave." (Of course, in ancient Greece, most prostitutes were slaves.)
 
The producers make much of the fact that the word "pornography" comes from the Greek pornos -- meaning "prostitute," but they translated it as "female sexual slave." (Of course, in ancient Greece, most prostitutes were slaves.)
I don’t know how much of this is political anymore lol But I love history about prostitution.
 
Back
Top