Chaotic Coffee Klatch (tea also available)

It’s usually pretty quiet in this thread now
I find it rather humerous really, if you go back a bit there was a lot of negativity towards keeping the thread going so I think those people will stay away on principle even though original management has returned 🙂

I have decided that I am going to post my proofs here even though certain people won't take the bait. :cool:
 
I find it rather humerous really, if you go back a bit there was a lot of negativity towards keeping the thread going so I think those people will stay away on principle even though original management has returned 🙂

I have decided that I am going to post my proofs here even though certain people won't take the bait. :cool:
@Cindy027

I'm a stayer & keeper of the thread.

Even if most of you still don't like me...
 
Last edited:
So I called a @OnaTangent a square in a thread and he never argued with me that he isn't. To tell you the honest truth that kinda deflated my exuberance at the time because, well to me anyway, I thought of a really cool proof to go along with my aspersions of the guy. The thread originally where I called him a square is the "Why Haven't You PMd the Poster Above You?" thread.

So here's the proof;

Euclid actually proved the framework for this proof, so not wanting to go into all the details the underlying proofs can be found in Euclid’s Elements. This has actually stood the test of time for oh.. about 2300 years, so you can’t argue the facts.

Now as he is on a tangent (T) that means he intersects a circle with radius (r) perpendicular to the tangent he is on, please see Fig 1.
CMKT Square proof 1.jpg

Now, we remove the circle and its associated radius, which leaves us with just the tangent and the right-angle symbol between the radius and the tangent, see Fig. 2.
CMKT Square proof 2.jpg

What we find is that this is a square and seeing that it is the only thing on the tangent, that means if you are OnaTangent then all you can be is a square.

QED. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
So I called a @OnaTangent a square in a thread and he never argued with me that he isn't. To tell you the honest truth that kinda deflated my exuberance at the time because, well to me anyway, I thought of a really cool proof to go along with my aspersions of the guy. The thread originally where I called him a square is the "Why Haven't You PMd the Poster Above You?" thread.

So here's the proof;

Euclid actually proved the framework for this proof, so not wanting to go into all the details the underlying proofs can be found in Euclid’s Elements. This has actually stood the test of time for oh.. about 2300 years, so you can’t argue the facts.

Now as he is on a tangent (T) that means he intersects a circle with radius (r) perpendicular to the tangent he is on, please see Fig 1.
View attachment 2545759

Now, we remove the circle and its associated radius, which leaves us with just the tangent and the right-angle symbol between the radius and the tangent, see Fig. 2.
View attachment 2545760

What we find is that this is a square and seeing that it is the only thing on the tangent, that means if you are OnaTangent then all you can be is a square.

QED. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
This is why math isn’t a science 😝
 
This is why math isn’t a science
Well for one it's maths :ROFLMAO: I mean you don't call it mathematic do you :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Just to be clear I never said it was all I did was show there are institutions of higher learning that do call it a science. We were debating the merits of what was sexier, actually you were saying ito of science, but I just couldn't let that stand as maths is so entwined in science that science couldn't exist without it. Therefore when it comes to sexy, maths has to be included.

Because mathematics is the language of the universe it has to be the sexiest of them all. 🔥
 
Back
Top