Leaked medical report 'proves Imane Khelif is a biological male

Nobody gives a damn what this fraudster and failed "businessman" thinks.
The IOC has enough resources to organise the Games fairly. The help of a convicted criminal is not necessary. For the latter, this is just a great excuse to realise his hateful thoughts anyway.
They really don't. Google IOC women's skating judging controversy, for one. So again, do you think men beating on women in the Olympics is a bad thing, because that would mean agreeing with Trump. Tough choice, eh? :)
 
No, it's no choice.
First, I fought men and women. Normally above my weight class. I lost some, I won others. I never lost because the others are men. I lost because the others are better.
Second, it's no choice. You pick out an individual case and make something up based on it. And the outrageous thing about it is that the individual case doesn't exist.
 
They really don't. Google IOC women's skating judging controversy, for one. So again, do you think men beating on women in the Olympics is a bad thing, because that would mean agreeing with Trump. Tough choice, eh? :)
If it ever happens be sure to let us know.
 
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...aked-medical-report/articleshow/121565465.cms

Medical test results from the 2023 World Championships revealed that Paris Olympics women's boxing champion Imane Khelif has male chromosomes, according to documents published for the first time. The disclosure comes just 36 hours after World Boxing mandated sex screening for Khelif's future eligibility in female competitions, adding complexity to the controversial saga surrounding the Olympic gold medallist.

The test results published on 3 Wire Sports website, conducted at Dr Lal PathLabs in New Delhi in March 2023, showed "abnormal" findings stating "Chromosome analysis reveals male karyotype." The laboratory is accredited by the American College of Pathologists and certified by the Swiss-based International Organisation for Standardisation.
 
How fun.

So why do you believe the report?
Not every source that discredits you is inaccurate. Not every source is a lie. You're ok with men that like to wear dresses compete in women sports.

Trans should have their own competition class.
 
Not every source that discredits you is inaccurate. Not every source is a lie. You're ok with men that like to wear dresses compete in women sports.
I haven't discredited any report. I asked you a question.

Trans should have their own competition class.
Certainly you can lobby for that in Olympic competition. I wish you well.
 
Again, the article doesn’t say that. Please stop making things up.
By now you need to read backwards thru the thread to see what is actually being discussed. The article doesn't say "that"? Doesn't mean anything without context. :)
 
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...aked-medical-report/articleshow/121565465.cms

Medical test results from the 2023 World Championships revealed that Paris Olympics women's boxing champion Imane Khelif has male chromosomes, according to documents published for the first time. The disclosure comes just 36 hours after World Boxing mandated sex screening for Khelif's future eligibility in female competitions, adding complexity to the controversial saga surrounding the Olympic gold medallist.

The test results published on 3 Wire Sports website, conducted at Dr Lal PathLabs in New Delhi in March 2023, showed "abnormal" findings stating "Chromosome analysis reveals male karyotype." The laboratory is accredited by the American College of Pathologists and certified by the Swiss-based International Organisation for Standardisation.
But she was born with a vagina. The whole “how do you define a woman” seems up in the air again. It’s all so confusing.
 
Not every source that discredits you is inaccurate. Not every source is a lie. You're ok with men that like to wear dresses compete in women sports.

Trans should have their own competition class.
Was she born with a vagina or not? Yes or no.
 
This thread speaks volumes about our Deplorable regulars here @ Lit.

You would think a literature site might have a slightly smarter - or possibly less pathetic - collection of Deplorables.

Nope. Threatened and dumb, the lot of 'em. :)
 
Back
Top