trump ditches Federalist Society, with loomer whispering in his ear

[butters]

loomer's like the Red Witch from G.O.Ts, but less attractive and nutty as a squirrel on adderal. And it seems trump's no longer convinced his SCOTUS picks will vote his way to get stuff done illegally.

"I am so disappointed in The Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous Judicial Nominations," Trump wrote in a post Thursday night... "This is something that cannot be forgotten!"

The frustration that has mounted in White House and MAGA circles as Trump's policies have been paused or stopped by court rulings is now out in the open, per Politico. Laura Loomer posted Friday on X that she's been warning that the Federalist Society is trying to undermine the president and shouldn't be included in his inner circle. Trump also attacked Leonard Leo, a former leader who played a major role in Trump's first-term judicial appointments, calling him a "real 'sleazebag'" in a post and questioning his motives.

All three of the Supreme Court justices picked by Trump—Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—came from a list compiled by Leo, per NPR. Barrett already has been criticized by Trump allies for votes this term.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...1&cvid=aa5ae150690f47998e32f5ad689249cf&ei=49

 

[Politruk]

The problem is that even Federalist Society judges are, well, lawyers. They know they can't just rule the way the president wants in every case.

 

[ChloeTzang]

They're good judges who know the law and that's their job. Trump wants yes-men who will do what he wants, like most of the Democrat-appointed judges do.

 

[MajorRewrite]

When the Federalist Society isn’t wacko enough for you, you’ve gone completely off the deep end.

Trump calling anyone else a “real sleazebag” is hilarious though. The man sleeps with Laura Loomer!

 

[dmallord]

They're good judges who know the law and that's their job. Trump wants yes-men who will do what he wants, like most of the Democrat-appointed judges do.

Wait! The democrat judges do what trump wants them to?

 

[YDB95]

Trump wants yes-men who will do what he wants, like most of the Democrat-appointed judges do.

Even when you're free of Trump's sway, you still can't stop projecting.

 

[Lazaran]

Even when you're free of Trump's sway, you still can't stop projecting.

The person that was capable of voting for Trump in the first place is still present in Chloe “Chicongo” Tzang.

The core MAGAt principles - hate, racism, misogyny (or self-loathing), bigotry, ignorance, etc - are also still present, and likely always will be (sociopaths don’t change).



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[Politruk]

I guess now Trump has to find some organization of lawyers that is to the Federalist Society as Gun Owners of America is to the NRA.

 

[Escierto]

Trump is probably fucking Loomer with that tiny dick of his. She wants to be his Eva Braun in the bunker.

 

[butters]

Trump is probably fucking Loomer with that tiny dick of his. She wants to be his Eva Braun in the bunker.

she wants power

if that means doing trump... (mind bleach, stat)

 

[RobDownSouth]

They're good judges who know the law and that's their job. Trump wants yes-men who will do what he wants, like most of the Democrat-appointed judges do.

The "Democratic-appointed judges" are yes-men who support Trump?
Who knew?

 

[ChloeTzang]

The "Democratic-appointed judges" are yes-men who support Trump?
Who knew?

LOL. Yes-persons for left wing causes and views. Unfortunately GOP appointed justices are rather more committed to the law, not to making it up on the fly

 

[RobDownSouth]

LOL. Yes-persons for left wing causes and views. Unfortunately GOP appointed justices are rather more committed to the law, not to making it up on the fly

That's a rather biased, specious take.

 

[ll74]

LOL. Yes-persons for left wing causes and views. Unfortunately GOP appointed justices are rather more committed to the law, not to making it up on the fly

Even ACB?

I've heard you kids don't like her

 

[jomar]

trump is so transactional it’s kind of fascinating. He actually thinks that since “he” put them on the bench that they owe him something and should be loyal to him and his desires. Amazing.

 

[Saint_Ann]

LOL. Yes-persons for left wing causes and views. Unfortunately GOP appointed justices are rather more committed to the law, not to making it up on the fly

You have to explain everything twice to these clowns.

 

[ll74]

You have to explain everything twice to these clowns.

Says the

 

[Saint_Ann]

Says the

Oh. Now I remember you.

 

[ll74]

Oh. Now I remember you.

Tell me more about your God guy

 

[Politruk]

LOL. Yes-persons for left wing causes and views.

There are no leftists on any judicial bench.

 

[ll74]

There are no leftists on any judicial bench.

You're a dumbass

 

[ChloeTzang]

Even ACB?

I've heard you kids don't like her

Personally I think all Trump's appointees have turned out to eb good, ACB included. I know there's some MAGA frustration, but honestly, they are there to interpret and rule on law, not twist and turn to try and get Trump wins. That's got Trum and Congress to change the law if that's needed. I just wish the Demovcta appointed justices saw their role similarly.

 

[ChloeTzang]

There are no leftists on any judicial bench.

Get real. You know there are.

 

[ll74]

Personally I think all Trump's appointees have turned out to eb good, ACB included. I know there's some MAGA frustration, but honestly, they are there to interpret and rule on law, not twist and turn to try and get Trump wins. That's got Trum and Congress to change the law if that's needed. I just wish the Demovcta appointed justices saw their role similarly.

I have no issue with any justice on the court. The judicial branch has been the most true to its purpose than any other branch.

I disagree with some rulings across the board, but it's the only branch doing anything to hold true to the Constitution.

And I don't give a fuck whether they rule for or against this current fuck head

 

[YDB95]

Unfortunately GOP appointed justices are rather more committed to the law, not to making it up on the fly

Examples, please, of Dem-appointed justices "making it up on the fly". People like you have been making that claim since before either of us were born, yet they never can point to any such cases.