🫧Chloe's Curiosities Captivated🫦

[Chloe_Harper]

Has anyone admitted to any weird kinks yet?
https://media3.giphy.com/media/9xW5R8fKtEVHy/giphy.gif?cid=9b38fe91x9fsx40i4dkqwrad3rqlg3620phuve5wgbwweil6&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

Ugh. No. Idk why. We are on Lit

I suppose I'll have to make some posts geared to some specific "weird" kinks to see if they resonate with others

Ah, life is so hard sometimes

 

[MischiefMakerAlways]

Ugh. No. Idk why. We are on Lit

I suppose I'll have to make some posts geared to some specific "weird" kinks to see if they resonate with others

Ah, life is so hard sometimes

That's what she said.

 

[cascadiabound]

"Weird" is such a subjective adjective.
I'm pretty sure I have a lot of weird kinks, but only relative to what someone else thinks is "weird".

 

[Nightbird]

"Weird" is such a subjective adjective.
I'm pretty sure I have a lot of weird kinks, but only relative to what someone else thinks is "weird".

THIS!!! SO THIS!!! I agree weird who gets to say whats weird or what isn't?

 

[Chloe_Harper]

"Weird" is such a subjective adjective.
I'm pretty sure I have a lot of weird kinks, but only relative to what someone else thinks is "weird".

This is what we discussed when "weird" kinks was initially brought up. What defines a weird kink, etc. @MischiefMakerAlways even created a poll.

For example, there are kinks I'm into that I think are fairly normal, but I also know there are some I like that even I find weird. Inexplicable.

I think weird is wrongly understood to be negative. I like seeing it more as unusual, out-of-ordinary fun. Maybe even something that isn't a regular kink.

On that note, are there "normal" kinks? What makes them normal? Is it that they are more widely accepted or acted upon?

THIS was the initial conversation. So, I make jokes about the weird factor because I find that if there is a light-hearted air around it, maybe people (including myself) will feel less closed-off in discussing them.

 

[Chloe_Harper]

THIS!!! SO THIS!!! I agree weird who gets to say whats weird or what isn't?

You do. What is weird for you and what isnt weird for you. Someone else may find it completely not weird, normal even. Or, maybe someone hasn't even heard of it (I had never heard of figging until @MischiefMakerAlways quiz, and I do find that one weird). Maybe, something is weird until you try it, and then you're like, "oh, now I get it!" Even if it's still not for you.

This is all just fun discussion, not anything accusatory, demeaning, or the like. People can choose to share and discuss, or not.

 

[Chloe_Harper]

Ok, let's talk about "weird" kinks

I love finding people who have similar kinks to mine but from different reasonings or perspectives. I also love finding out why people like things I just have never gotten into.

I also find it super interesting when partners start to get into new kinks simply because of how much it turns their partner on.

I feel like sex is a constant journey where one should have fun exploring, both alone and with others. You never know where your sexual revelations will come from.

There's a lot of the "usual" stuff. So, what do I mean when I say "weird" kinks? The ones that make you blush or think twice about sharing (nothing that breaks Lit rules or legal ones). The ones that you maybe only explore in secret or with a trusted partner.

No one has to share, to be very clear. Or, maybe you want to only talk about what is "normal" kinky versus "weird" kinky. What is it that drew people to wanting this topic? Or maybe y'all just wanted to know all of my weird stuff

So, let's start here. How do we find the line between "normal" and "weird" when it comes to kinks? Or, did I already define it, and it is person-dependent?

For those just joining the conversation about "weird" kinks, this was the original post

 

[Nightbird]

You do. What is weird for you and what isnt weird for you. Someone else may find it completely not weird, normal even. Or, maybe someone hasn't even heard of it (I had never heard of figging until @MischiefMakerAlways quiz, and I do find that one weird). Maybe, something is weird until you try it, and then you're like, "oh, now I get it!" Even if it's still not for you.

This is all just fun discussion, not anything accusatory, demeaning, or the like. People can choose to share and discuss, or not.

Wow this totally makes sense. And I didn't mean to be offensive or anything like that..

 

[Chloe_Harper]

Wow this totally makes sense. And I didn't mean to be offensive or anything like that..

No worries. I just like making sure people understand where I'm coming from is all when joining in the conversation, as well as understanding where the conversation started and intention.

 

[cascadiabound]

In some parts of Lit (including in the PG depending on whose thread you are in) DDlg is absolutely weird. For me it's not weird (at least my particular take on it for me) but I sure wouldn't talk about it with people I know in my neighborhood, book club or work mates because it would definitely be too weird for public consumption.

And that's just the tip of the proverbial iceberg.

 

[Nightbird]

In some parts of Lit (including in the PG depending on whose thread you are in) DDlg is absolutely weird. For me it's not weird (at least my particular take on it for me) but I sure wouldn't talk about it with people I know in my neighborhood, book club or work mates because it would definitely be too weird for public consumption.

And that's just the tip of the proverbial iceberg.

Whats DDlg?

 

[cascadiabound]

Whats DDlg?

And there you go.

DaddyDom/little girl. It's a version of D/s that has an emphasis on a more nurturing D and a female partner who can feel comfortable in a sense of being cared for/nurtured and may include activities that are somewhat regressive. It is not an incestuous relationship and it is not pedophilia. There is a whole thread devoted to discussions about and support of this dynamic here in the PG - Daddy's Little Girl.

https://forum.literotica.com/threads/daddys-little-girl-fourth-edition.1583842/

 

[Nightbird]

And there you go.

DaddyDom/little girl. It's a version of D/s that has an emphasis on a more nurturing D and a female partner who can feel comfortable in a sense of being cared for/nurtured and may include activities that are somewhat regressive. It is not an incestuous relationship and it is not pedophilia. There is a whole thread devoted to discussions about and support of this dynamic here in the PG - Daddy's Little Girl.

https://forum.literotica.com/threads/daddys-little-girl-fourth-edition.1583842/

Thanks Cas.. Sorry I wasn't familiar with that term. I understand the Daddy little girl dynamic though..

 

[MischiefMakerAlways]

Thanks Cas.. Sorry I wasn't familiar with that term. I understand the Daddy little girl dynamic though..

My baby girl calls me Daddy, but it isn't paternal in nature, nor is my reference to her being my baby girl a child-like moniker. I am her Dom, and we can play rough, but I am also the one she turns to for comfort, nurturing (as Cas pointed out), and I am her refuge. My lap is always available for her. I am fiercely protective of her, I want to envelope her in my love, and I will do my damnedest to watch out for her. But she is also a kick-ass woman who commands the respect of her peers and coworkers, is a fucking amazing mother, and she knows how to get shit done. She is my equal, but she is free to not carry the burden of that equality at all times.

Does that make sense? I hope she chimes in with her own perspective (let's see if she does without being tagged).

 

[cascadiabound]

My baby girl calls me Daddy, but it isn't paternal in nature, nor is my reference to her being my baby girl a child-like moniker. I am her Dom, and we can play rough, but I am also the one she turns to for comfort, nurturing (as Cas pointed out), and I am her refuge. My lap is always available for her. I am fiercely protective of her, I want to envelope her in my love, and I will do my damnedest to watch out for her. But she is also a kick-ass woman who commands the respect of her peers and coworkers, is a fucking amazing mother, and she knows how to get shit done. She is my equal, but she is free to not carry the burden of that equality at all times.

Does that make sense? I hope she chimes in with her own perspective (let's see if she does without being tagged).

Much of this is how I work with my D too. I tried to do a very broad short version of DDlg. Thanks for being more specific. I guess I was feeling a bit weird about it.

 

[MischiefMakerAlways]

Much of this is how I work with my D too. I tried to do a very broad short version of DDlg. Thanks for being more specific. I guess I was feeling a bit weird about it.

If you had asked me my thoughts on DDlg just 7 or 8 months ago, I would have probably put it in the weird category. What I discovered though, is that I didn't actually know anything about it. But I'm a quick learner!

 

[cascadiabound]

If you had asked me my thoughts on DDlg just 7 or 8 months ago, I would have probably put it in the weird category. What I discovered though, is that I didn't actually know anything about it. But I'm a quick learner!

I think this is true for many people when they first encounter the dynamic. I think the fiercely protective/place of comfort is central, but I enjoy all kinds of flavors including rough play, CMnf, spanking etc. (all of which could easily fall under "weird")

I always say that all of the sex stuff is a giant buffet of things to try. You get to put anything on your plate that looks good to you. And if you don't like it, you don't ever have to eat another bite of that particular dish.

 

[Chloe_Harper]

In some parts of Lit (including in the PG depending on whose thread you are in) DDlg is absolutely weird. For me it's not weird (at least my particular take on it for me) but I sure wouldn't talk about it with people I know in my neighborhood, book club or work mates because it would definitely be too weird for public consumption.

And that's just the tip of the proverbial iceberg.

It's funny because this kind of dynamic, in the broad sense, is one of the more common types. However, because there are so many different avenues one can take with it, it's a weird one to talk about and explain to people oftentimes.

People often misconstrue that age play and DDlg are synonymous, but they aren't. Age play is something that can be brought into a DDlg dynamic, but not a necessity. There's regression of different levels, but not necessarily age play. But, I think a lot more people find it odd because there's a lack of understanding.

Age play is what people find really weird, and I can even find levels of it where I wouldn't go. It's like extreme regression in a certain sense, but there are parts of that that are too weird for me. I get it, I get why people do it, but it's weird.

This, of course, isn't facts across the board, just my experience. Trying to teach a partner, explain to a partner, about DDlg when they don't know much about it is always a tricky conversation initially. Trying to discuss it with friends on Lit who don't know much about it is tricky. I think real life groups or friends I would discuss it with exist, but are very limited.

Oddly, I think more of them would be more accepting of a DDlg relationship than they would knowing I like being choked

 

[Sexy_Singer]

I can’t use that one in my state which is how I ended up using Opera but I can use pornhub just fine

I know I'm missing something here.

I love opera and all, but Bolero is a good way to go to to get in the mood.

 

[barefootgirl69]

Until I came to Lit, I really didn't think I was kinky. I knew I was into bondage and D/s, but all the other things...wasn't it normal to just do what felt good? Even if it only happened in "a moment" without thinking about it?

And who knew that some of the things I liked or had done had an actual NAME ascribed to it? How did that happen? Did a bunch of people come together and discuss it? I made the mistake once of asking "Why is it called snowballing?" in a post, and discovered some questions are better asked in PM with someone you trust.

As for DD/lg, it's something that is me, who I am intrinsically, and I don't consider it a kink. I think of it as a lifestyle.

I try not to judge other's kink, but there are some things that give me the ick and I avoid them like the plague. It's just not for me.

 

[Lord Pmann]

Until I came to Lit, I really didn't think I was kinky. I knew I was into bondage and D/s, but all the other things...wasn't it normal to just do what felt good? Even if it only happened in "a moment" without thinking about it?

It’s funny, I had the opposite experience. I came to Lit thinking I was kind of kinky. Then I got here and realized how there was a world of shit I never knew existed. I realized I was a cup of vanilla ice cream.

 

[barefootgirl69]

It’s funny, I had the opposite experience. I came to Lit thinking I was kind of kinky. Then I got here and realized how there was a world of shit I never knew existed. I realized I was a cup of vanilla ice cream.

I told someone I was vanilla...because I thought I was!

 

[Lord Pmann]

I told someone I was vanilla...because I thought I was!

I’ve said before… some of my proclivities are ones I wouldn’t feel comfortable sharing with my mother. Some of your proclivities are ones I wouldn’t feel comfortable sharing with Satan herself.

 

[barefootgirl69]

I’ve said before… some of my proclivities are ones I wouldn’t feel comfortable sharing with my mother. Some of your proclivities are ones I wouldn’t feel comfortable sharing with Satan herself.

I've heard about you and a piece of fruit.

 

[Lord Pmann]

I've heard about you and a piece of fruit.

This is a rumour! I never fucked that watermelon. You know they are the least truthful of all the fruits.

(And it was just a smile that I remember from you! Re: other thread)