Will Trump Suspend Habeas Corpus For Illegals?

[Mystories189]

Lol

Right

You said convcoction was required for him not to destroy this country.

Clarification
...¯⁠\⁠(⁠°⁠_⁠o⁠)⁠/⁠¯

It's not a hard concept. Criminals should not be elected to office. Trump's convention shows that he's a criminal.

 

[ll74]

It's not a hard concept. Criminals should not be elected to office.

Ok, but that is an election discussion, not a conviction discussion.

Trump's convention shows that he's a criminal.

Ok.

And?

 

[Mystories189]

Ok I'm really confused with what you are taking issue with then.

 

[ll74]

Ok I'm really confused with what you are taking issue with then.

Yes, that is very apparent. Even after I spelled it out for you.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Deluks isn’t very good at this “trolling” thing, not even after 15 years under this 1 alt.

Lol

 

[DeluxAuto]

Deluks isn’t very good at this “trolling” thing, not even after 15 years under this 1 alt.

Lol

I'm about efficiency. It's taken you dozens of alts over 2 decades and you still come up short, dwarf.

 

[icanhelp1]

Hillary Clinton lost the election and is no longer in politics.
The right is the one who elevates every word she says

Same with Obama.

I wouldn't care about either except for the MAGA fucks here projecting their messaging.

Clinton is the author. Since LIT leftist lunes commonly use the adjective, it is therefor relevant!

 

[icanhelp1]

If Fox News writes the history books, anyway.

I agree, all the other corrupted media platforms were in on the cover up.

 

[ll74]

Clinton is the author. Since LIT leftist lunes commonly use the adjective, it is therefor relevant!

The word deplorable existed prior to Clinton and exists.after Clinton.

You learning new words because of her seems to be a you issue.

 

[icanhelp1]

I'm about STUPIDITY. It's taken you dozens of alts over 2 decades and you still come up short, dwarf.

FYP

 

[Rightguide]

I think we all stumbled on the core problems, that's that people have no idea that undocumented immigrants are NOT illegal. Even if they do not have legal status, which many do, they are not illegal under criminal law, just policy law. Them being here does not make them automatically criminals. And yes, due process is afforded to Everyone, not just citizens. As far as there being an invasion? Wtf? People seeking asylum and looking for a place to live are automatically invading? No. An invasion is if Trump decided to send troops in to Greenland to claim land. Immigration is not invasion by any stretch of the imagination. Any word I don't think you understand on top of due process and invasion, is gaslighting. Thats kind of when try to convince someone that something that happened, didn't happen or vice versa, not anything to do with the facts I presented. And as far as Biden and Obama deporting people, if you ckaim it's no different, then what was all this BS about them wanting open boarders, you can have it both ways. And yes, there is a huge difference in the way went about it. First of all, optics, they didn't make a show of it, inviting Dr Phil and publicizing every raid. Second of all, Trump is focusing on speed and force, making it very sloppy, going after the wrong people, detaining citizens, destroying property, etc. Third of all they didn't send droves of these people to unethical prisons where people are treated like cattle. Finally, and I can't stand this, stop making the "but it was done in the past" arguments for everything Trump does. Yes, at one point in history, someone dis something as bad as Trump, but if you do all the shifty things that people have done in the past, that makes you worse than the people who did the individual things.

The core problem here is your ignorance:

Here is the legal citation for the statute criminalizing illegal entry into the United States:

8 U.S.C. § 1325(a) (2024) — Improper entry by alien

“Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under Title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both...”

For reentry after removal, the citation is:

8 U.S.C. § 1326 (2024) — Reentry of removed aliens

“Subject to subsection (b), any alien who—(1) has been denied admission, excluded, deported, or removed… and thereafter enters, attempts to enter, or is at any time found in, the United States… shall be fined under Title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.”

 

[ll74]

The core problem here is your ignorance:

Here is the legal citation for the statute criminalizing illegal entry into the United States:

8 U.S.C. § 1325(a) (2024) — Improper entry by alien

“Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under Title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both...”

For reentry after removal, the citation is:

8 U.S.C. § 1326 (2024) — Reentry of removed aliens

“Subject to subsection (b), any alien who—(1) has been denied admission, excluded, deported, or removed… and thereafter enters, attempts to enter, or is at any time found in, the United States… shall be fined under Title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.”

Now cite the asylum claim statute. The one with appropriate status.

 

[Rightguide]

Or you could have just answered my question

But thank you for noticing I had updated my photo. I had no idea you were fixating on them. Sweet of you xxx

Seriously though, this happens every time. Why are you so scared of answering even the simplest of questions?

Surely you're not hoping no-one will notice

No need to run away and hide, just take whatever courage you can muster in both hands and answer it.

Dance monkey, dance!

We're talking about the possible suspension of habeas corpus, deportation, and the need for public safety.

 

[LeahWill]

We're talking about the possible suspension of habeas corpus, deportation, and the need for public safety.

Not that one silly.

The one that frightened you so much you started drooling over how much you liked my new photo to avoid answering it

Dance monkey, dance!

 

[HisArpy]

The core problem here is your ignorance:

Here is the legal citation for the statute criminalizing illegal entry into the United States:

8 U.S.C. § 1325(a) (2024) — Improper entry by alien

“Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under Title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both...”

For reentry after removal, the citation is:

8 U.S.C. § 1326 (2024) — Reentry of removed aliens

“Subject to subsection (b), any alien who—(1) has been denied admission, excluded, deported, or removed… and thereafter enters, attempts to enter, or is at any time found in, the United States… shall be fined under Title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.”

Some talking head in the media said it was only a misdemeanor so they all repeat it like good little lemmings without even bothering to check. And, when faced with the actual statutory language, they'll refuse to believe it. Because some talking head on the TV said it was only a misdemeanor.

They really are that stupid.

 

[icanhelp1]

The word deplorable existed prior to Clinton and exists.after Clinton.

You learning new words because of her seems to be a you issue.

Politically speaking Clinton was the author. She concocted the term as a derogatory remark against Trump voters. Now, you can make up all the nonsense you want, but when it comes to LIT lunes, the term is used as a TDS pejorative .

 

[icanhelp1]

Good fact based argument. I can tell you were head of the debate club.

I posted a ton of factual arguments long ago, feel free to read them. Do your own research, I did!!

 

[ll74]

Politically speaking Clinton was the author.

For you, yes ...I get that.

She concocted the term as a description of Trump voters.

Which was perfect and still valid.

Now, you can make up all the nonsense you want, but when it comes to LIT lunes, the term is used as a TDS pejorative .

It's used to describe MAGA fucks...and fits perfectly as a.description of MAGA fucks.

 

[icanhelp1]

For you, yes ...I get that.


Which was perfect and still valid.


It's used to describe MAGA fucks...and fits perfectly as a.description of MAGA fucks.

In your own delusional mind!

 

[ll74]

In your own delusional mind!

In my logical mind. The entire purpose of MAGA fucks is to own the libs. That is absolutely deplorable, objectively speaking.

You would be the delusional one for thinking otherwise.

 

[icanhelp1]

In my logical mind. The entire purpose of MAGA fucks is to own the libs. That is absolutely deplorable, objectively speaking.

You would be the delusional one for thinking otherwise.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1920810996521910659

 

[icanhelp1]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1920810996521910659

Typical democrat!

 

[DeluxAuto]

FYP

You couldn't fix toast, traitor. Have you been able to prove me wrong yet?

Of course not because you're a lying piece of shit traitor.

 

[ll74]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1920810996521910659

Whataboutism

Neat!

 

[Politruk]

We're talking about the possible suspension of habeas corpus, deportation, and the need for public safety.

Which has nothing to do with the presence of immigrants. Citizens are actually more dangerous.