LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Rogue Anti-Trump Judge Hit With Articles Of Impeachment

HisArpy said:
There's an ethics rule involved. SCOTUS justices should refrain from public comment on political issues or matters which may come before them.

This is the claim they ALL make during their confirmation hearings. Roberts should have kept his DAMNED mouth shut because it completely destroys anyone in future confirmation hearings from making the claim of neutrality.
Click to expand...
The way the right wing scotus members all said they believe in precedent?

Fucking hypocrite
 
Just checking in...

Did the judge get convicted on articles of impeachment?

Did Elon purchase MSNBC yet?

Are we now in the Golden Age of Amerikkka?
 
"Rogue anti-Trump judge" is, of course, a contradiction in terms.

A judge who rapes and murders his law clerk, in open court, should get a pass if he does anything to obstruct Trump.
 
Politruk said:
"Rogue anti-Trump judge" is, of course, a contradiction in terms.

A judge who rapes and murders his law clerk, in open court, should get a pass if he does anything to obstruct Trump.
Click to expand...
So let me get this straight - you would condone a heinous violent crime because the judge did not rule in Trump’s favor?

Good Lord- this statement is nothing but hyperbole intended to criticize anyone that opposes McDumbNut. You are flat suggesting that you would forgive that person to help Trump.

Says a lot about you? What are you willing to do? I’m guessing some of these heinous crimes because you think Trump would back you? Or you are just going to blatantly disregard human decency? I’m going with the latter
 
Cheshire_cat71 said:
So let me get this straight - you would condone a heinous violent crime because the judge did not rule in Trump’s favor?

Good Lord- this statement is nothing but hyperbole intended to criticize anyone that opposes McDumbNut. You are flat suggesting that you would forgive that person to help Trump.

Says a lot about you? What are you willing to do? I’m guessing some of these heinous crimes because you think Trump would back you? Or you are just going to blatantly disregard human decency? I’m going with the latter
Click to expand...
Whoosh!
 
Rightguide said:
Congressman Brandon Gill (R-TX) introduced the resolution on Tuesday, citing Boasberg’s intervention as a direct constitutional violation that obstructed the president’s enforcement of immigration law. “By thwarting President Trump’s lawful efforts to deport violent illegal alien gangsters, Judge Boasberg created a constitutional crisis. He is unfit for judicial office,” Gill wrote in a statement on social media.
Click to expand...
 
"For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose." – John Roberts
 
goldytheGoldfish said:
"For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose." – John Roberts
Click to expand...
Yet flagrant violations of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by these inferior Federal District Court judges are legion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Congressman introduces articles of impeachment against Trump
2
Replies
48
Views
958
Bray123
B
P
The Most Important Judge in America
Replies
24
Views
644
Politruk
P
Rightguide
Big Court Win for Trump As Judge Dismisses USAID Case on Jurisdictional Grounds
Replies
6
Views
161
Bray123
B
P
Federal Judge: Government can’t rely on Alien Enemy Act to deport Venezuelans
Replies
1
Views
139
Politruk
P
butters
George Bush appointed Federal judge strikes down trump's exec order against law firm
Replies
20
Views
593
ll74
ll74
Back
Top