LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Wiki About To Be Thumped By The DOJ

^^^^^^^^^^^
Love you took my advice and made a quick return to your cut and paste roots. 🥰
 
Rotadom said:
I guess admitting that MAGATs are too dumb to edit wiki is an opinion.
Click to expand...
It's not that, but that conservative edits are rejected and the editors removed from Wikipedia

I'm friends with a conservative Sci-Fi author who has had his bio altered by left-wing Wikipedia editors and his corrections are instantly removed.
 
ChloeTzang said:
It's not that, but that conservative edits are rejected and the editors removed from Wikipedia

I'm friends with a conservative Sci-Fi author who has had his bio altered by left-wing Wikipedia editors and his corrections are instantly removed.
Click to expand...
Cool anecdotal nonsense.
 
ChloeTzang said:
It's not that, but that conservative edits are rejected and the editors removed from Wikipedia

I'm friends with a conservative Sci-Fi author who has had his bio altered by left-wing Wikipedia editors and his corrections are instantly removed.
Click to expand...

Do tell what changes to his bio would a, checking my notes here, conservative Sci-Fi author object to? Star Wars and Star Trek are toowoke in his opinion???
 
Rightguide said:
It's obvious you know too little about the subject to comment.
Click to expand...
I know exactly how wiki works, hence my on point comment. This is another thread that you created because you got sucked in by a headline but totally fail to grasp the content.
 
There's no way this case doesn't get laughed out of court in ten minutes. Not even if Trump had appointed the judge.
 
Politruk said:
Only an idiot would think that of a wiki which has a rigorously enforced neutrality policy. And which was founded by Jimmy Wales, a Libertarian.
Click to expand...
So, go ahead and explain to us in detail why the DOJ has no case.
 
Rotadom said:
I know exactly how wiki works, hence my on point comment. This is another thread that you created because you got sucked in by a headline but totally fail to grasp the content.
Click to expand...
He read a headline and is convinced he's an expert on the subject matter
 
If I want to know the atomic weight of selenium or something simply factual like that, I go to Wikipedia.

If the question is politically controversial, I go to RationalWiki.
 
Politruk said:
There's no way this case doesn't get laughed out of court in ten minutes. Not even if Trump had appointed the judge.
Click to expand...
Politruk's worldview is shaped by rigid, often dogmatic ideology. The truth is irrelevant to him; what matters is whether the narrative fits his branded ideology. If the facts don't align with the party line, they get twisted, ignored, or conveniently omitted. He will selectively absorb only information that confirms his dogmatic beliefs. If a piece of evidence contradicts his position, he'll either dismiss it outright or reframe it in a way that suits his agenda. This leaves him stuck in a feedback loop where he's always right, but in his mind.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
DOJ ends water treatment in Alabama
2 3
Replies
62
Views
730
Fuzzy1975
F
Rightguide
Wray Gets Referred To The DOJ For Prosecution
Replies
3
Views
99
1984X2024
1
P
What is "race-baiting"?
2 3
Replies
52
Views
622
Politruk
P
Rotadom
Stephen Miller is Running the DOJ, and Pam Bondi is Just a Figurehead
Replies
5
Views
158
Saint_Ann
Saint_Ann
P
Dirigisme
Replies
7
Views
157
Bray123
B
Back
Top