Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mostly it was antisemitism and misogyny.Yeah, they did…
We. Told. Them. So.
![]()
Kamala is not Jewish. And anti-Israel is not antisemitic.Mostly it was antisemitism and misogyny.
Mostly it was antisemitism and misogyny.
Accusing Israel of genocide and apartheid is antisemitic. A lot of progressives have a lot a hard work to do.Kamala is not Jewish. And anti-Israel is not antisemitic.
That is a lie.Accusing Israel of genocide and apartheid is antisemitic.
Why is accusing Israel of anything anitsemitic?Accusing Israel of genocide and apartheid is antisemitic.
If Israel were committing genocide in Gaza it wouldn't be antisemitic to say so, but Israel has come nowhere close to committing genocide. In fact they've continued to supply food to the people who started the war and want Israel erased from the map.Why is accusing Israel of anything anitsemitic?
Are people supposed to pretend the nation can do no wrong or be accused of anything?
Singling out the world's only majority-Jewish state for special condemnation is antisemitic.Accusing the Jews, collectively, of some crime would be antisemitic. But the State of Israel is not the Jews, despite the ancient practice of using "Israel" as a collective term for the Jewish people -- "Let his name be called in Israel," etc.
Your assertion would just make it a false claim, not 'antisemitic'.If Israel were committing genocide in Gaza it wouldn't be antisemitic to say so, but Israel has come nowhere close to committing genocide.
Since when is the term 'genocide' a 'slur' and not just a descriptor?The use of the "genocide" slur against Israel is pure antisemitism.
Since when has the state of Israel being accused of genocide qualified as 'special' criticism? The accusation of state perpetuated genocide has existed long before the state of Israel has.Singling out the world's only majority-Jewish state for special criticism is antisemitic.
It's a slur because the Jews are well-known for being the victims of an actual genocide. Antisemites take particular glee at being able to apply the term to the Gazans.Your assertion would just make it a false claim, not 'antisemitic'.
Since when is the term 'genocide' a 'slur' and not just a descriptor?
That alone should give you a clue that the accusations are baseless. The population in Gaza has steadily increased all through the so-called "genocide".Since when has the state of Israel being accused of genocide qualified as 'special' criticism? The accusation of state perpetuated genocide has existed long before the state of Israel has.
Only if it is being condemned as a Jewish state. South Africa never was one, and was widely condemned for Apartheid; it is not antisemitic to condemn Israel for similar policies.Singling out the world's only majority-Jewish state for special condemnation is antisemitic.
I very much doubt that it has increased much since this war started. Have the births even kept pace with the deaths?That alone should give you a clue that the accusations are baseless. The population in Gaza has steadily increased all through the so-called "genocide".
Any group having been the victim of genocide does not make them immune from that accusation, nor does it change the term to a 'slur'.It's a slur because the Jews are well-known for being the victims of an actual genocide.
Your assertions are just asserting a false claim. No group gets to claim an accusation is suddenly a slur just because they point to historical claims of equivalent accusations in reverse.That alone should give you a clue that the accusations are baseless. The population in Gaza has steadily increased all through the so-called "genocide".
Why is accusing Israel of anything anitsemitic?
Are people supposed to pretend the nation can do no wrong or be accused of anything?
In fact they have. Hamas has been reporting all deaths in Gaza as a result of the war. That's how they got to their inflated numbers.I very much doubt that it has increased much since this war started. Have the births even kept pace with the deaths?
Which of Israel's policies do you consider Apartheid?Only if it is being condemned as a Jewish state. South Africa never was one, and was widely condemned for Apartheid; it is not antisemitic to condemn Israel for similar policies.
Exercising control over populations that have no voice in the government that rules them. The OTs might as well be a Bantustan -- even if they get to elect their own government, it does not get to do anything Israel will not allow.Which of Israel's policies do you consider Apartheid?
The fact that the Jews were the victims of genocide doesn't automatically make the accusation against Israel false. It explains why the false accusation is so popular with antisemites.Any group having been the victim of genocide does not make them immune from that accusation, nor does it change the term to a 'slur'.
Your assertions are just asserting a false claim. No group gets to claim an accusation is suddenly a slur just because they point to historical claims of equivalent accusations in reverse.
If Mexican terrorists had conducted a border raid and taken a hundred Americans hostage, we might now be at war with Mexico, but we would not be pounding every Mexican city to rubble, and nobody in our government would even be talking about expelling Mexico's entire population.Meanwhile: What would ANY country in a similar situation as Israel after the 10/7 attack / atrocity do??? And what should the world’s attitude be to the whole situation???