Can somebody please explain to me why any civilian should be allowed to own a gun that looks like this?

[HisArpy]

So you approve of Iran and North Korea having nukes right?

WE don't have much to say about it.

The government, however, does. As a matter of National Security allowing state sponsors of terror to maintain a nuclear arsenal is stupid and if it can be prevented, then it should be.

 

[HisArpy]

What is more tyrannical than a king?

You should tell the Brits who visit this site that their king is a tyrant. I'm sure they'll agree with you and you'll win lots of new friends that way.

 

[Lazaran]

As opposed to HisArpy, who has grown soft on cheeseburgers.

Only Derpy’s spine, dick, brain, gut, muscle tone, bones, principles, dignity, courage, & patriotism. “has grown soft on cheeseburgers” - everything else is solid as a rock…

 

[Politruk]

Can somebody please explain to me why any civilian should be allowed to own a gun that looks like this?View attachment 2519844

Because that is not a real gun. It is only a toy.

 

[Sean Renaud]

WE don't have much to say about it.

The government, however, does. As a matter of National Security allowing state sponsors of terror to maintain a nuclear arsenal is stupid and if it can be prevented, then it should be.

Then you by definition do not believe in the 2nd Amendment. Congrats. At least not as written. I don't really have strong feelings about any nation be it North Korea, Iran or Iraq having nukes. However I also don't pretend that I have "rights" granted by God or Nature. I believe I have privileges granted by my government and the hopes that I will always be on the side of the agreement I want to be but the knowledge that can always change.

 

[Sean Renaud]

You should tell the Brits who visit this site that their king is a tyrant. I'm sure they'll agree with you and you'll win lots of new friends that way.

While on paper the the Royals still rule in practice they are just decorations they decided to keep around.

 

[Politruk]

While on paper the the Royals still rule in practice they are just decorations they decided to keep around.

The king is not expected to run the government -- but he is expected to keep a close eye on it, read every state paper that crosses his desk, and meet weekly with the PM to discuss government business. He is, in effect, the PM's chief advisor.

 

[Politruk]

It’s no one’s business but the person that owns it
2nd amendment
That would just be the start
The libturds want ALL of our weapons

Even you, I'm sure, would acknowledge that there are such things as military-grade weapons that civilians should not be allowed to possess.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

lol, my thoughts too,

You think? Trouble with those is the poor barrel seating. The light weight gives up a lot of accuracy. You need 30 rounds to do what one good aimed round can do. Just toys for wana be soldiers.

This post directed at me?

Interesting thought. Somewhat stupid all things considered because:

Our Constitution doesn't "allow" us our rights, it prohibits the government from intruding on them. Something which every gun control law does.

And here you are contributing to that infringement while complaining that your unwritten "right" to be free from fear is somehow greater than my ENUMERATED Rights.

Basically, you need to stop being a whiny shit and grow the fuck up little boi.

If so,why are too chickenshit to quote me? Adults address the issues, children point and run.....

 

[HisArpy]

Then you by definition do not believe in the 2nd Amendment. Congrats. At least not as written. I don't really have strong feelings about any nation be it North Korea, Iran or Iraq having nukes. However I also don't pretend that I have "rights" granted by God or Nature. I believe I have privileges granted by my government and the hopes that I will always be on the side of the agreement I want to be but the knowledge that can always change.

The 2nd Amendment guarantees THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms.

It doesn't say shit about other nations.

Re; god given rights: I guess you don't have a right to think, right? Because that's god given. Just like breathing and a heartbeat are god given. Or do you think those things were issued to you by the government?

All of that means your talking points just imploded on you because you're a dipshit who doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

I think it says a lot about a society when you need a shit load of guns, especially fully automatic and with all extra equipments to feel safe.

Yep, to be so afraid of your neighbour, a stranger, a person who doesn't look like you, your government, you need to be armed with an assault weapon....pretty fucking sad place to be.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

yeah I'm going to trust you guys with my safety.

If you lived in a civilised place, you wouldn't need to protect your own safety.

 

[Politruk]

Our Constitution doesn't "allow" us our rights, it prohibits the government from intruding on them.

Jefferson lied. Nobody had any pre-existent rights. They only exist if a law says so. There are no "natural" or "God-given" rights.

 

[Lazaran]

No just like we didn’t do anything when pedo Joe opened the border

President Biden deported MORE undocumented immigrants that DonOld, and he was burdened by human traffickers using REPUBLICANS LIES THAT THEnBORDER WAS OPEN to entice desperate migrants to make the dangerous journey to the United States. The SABOTAGING of the immigration reform and border security bill by DonOld and the MAGAt republicans didn’t help matters.





REPUBLICANS are SOLEY responsible for the spike in undocumented immigrants and the deaths, rapes, and other crimes related to their LIES ABOUT OPEN BORDERS and their SABOTAGING of the immigration reform and border security bill. Full stop.





(Side note: Slanderous UNSUBSTANTIATED comments about President Biden don’t help your argument and should result in your banning from the site.)

Hope that ^ helps.





Also:

We. Told. Them. So.

 

[Politruk]

pedo Joe

You are an idiot.

opened the border

Doubly.

 

[Typo Fu Master]

Even you, I'm sure, would acknowledge that there are such things as military-grade weapons that civilians should not be allowed to possess.

Why? What kind of weapon do you believe is "military-grade"? Do you think they'd be incompetent just because they're a civilian? What should a civilian have to know to be qualified to own and operate one? Or is this about putting too much power where you don't think it belongs? Are civilians more likely to be mentally unstable? What, exactly, is wrong with civilians owning "military-grade" weapons?

 

[Politruk]

The 2nd Amendment guarantees THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms.

"A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State . . ."

But, it isn't. "Militia" in the 18th-Century sense -- a non-professional volunteer force -- has played no role in any American conflict since the Spanish-American War.

 

[Politruk]

Why? What kind of weapon do you believe is "military-grade"?

Automatic rifles, and anything that packs more punch than that.

Do you think they'd be incompetent just because they're a civilian? What should a civilian have to know to be qualified to own and operate one? Or is this about putting too much power where you don't think it belongs? Are civilians more likely to be mentally unstable? What, exactly, is wrong with civilians owning "military-grade" weapons?

It is not that civilians are incompetent, it is that civilians are civilians. They are not under military discipline. Soldiers are, and that carefully restrains what they can do with their weapons. And of course civilians are more likely to be mentally unstable, because soldiers are screened for that.

You really don't want to live in a world where your neighbor can escalate a dispute over a borrowed lawnmower by demolishing your house with artillery. You don't want to live in a world where a kid who plays a prank with a cherry bomb could as easily use a grenade.

 

[HisArpy]

Jefferson lied. Nobody had any pre-existent rights. They only exist if a law says so. There are no "natural" or "God-given" rights.

Sez the dumfuk of Lit.

 

[PintlerMan]

why? because I can, and it's no ones business.

 

[Typo Fu Master]

Automatic rifles, and anything that packs more punch than that.

For killing deer, it's overkill. I think we're on the same page in that regard. I also think that, as long as you don't hurt anyone, you should be able to do as you damn well please.

It is not that civilians are incompetent, it is that civilians are civilians. They are not under military discipline. Soldiers are, and that carefully restrains what they can do with their weapons.

Why does this disqualify civilians from owning a "military-grade" weapon? You appear to believe this is a Too Much Power issue. "Someone more important than me should get to decide when I'm allowed to use my "military-grade" weapon".

And of course civilians are more likely to be mentally unstable, because soldiers are screened for that.

Shit happens. Stable people can become unstable. I tend to think Lizzy Borden just snapped one day.

You really don't want to live in a world where your neighbor can escalate a dispute over a borrowed lawnmower by demolishing your house with artillery.

I already do. House is still standing.

 

[Wat_Tyler]

https://images7.memedroid.com/images/UPLOADED544/651f6223c1a14.webp

 

[Fuzzy1975]

So, so far no one's given a better reason to own one than "ego" or "because I can". Damn lowbrows, quit living up to our expectations....*chuckles*

 

[Sean Renaud]

The king is not expected to run the government -- but he is expected to keep a close eye on it, read every state paper that crosses his desk, and meet weekly with the PM to discuss government business. He is, in effect, the PM's chief advisor.

I'm American so I only know the Royalty as an interesting intersection of academia and media. On paper they hold power. How much do they genuinely wield and exercise though I'm not really sure and think its pretty minimal. Well said though.

The 2nd Amendment guarantees THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms.

It doesn't say shit about other nations.

It doesn't need to. The way it is written these rights are part of being human. So now you're claim is that only Americans are human. These are about keeping the government from TAKING your arms. It presupposed you have them to seize.

Re; god given rights: I guess you don't have a right to think, right? Because that's god given. Just like breathing and a heartbeat are god given. Or do you think those things were issued to you by the government?

All of that means your talking points just imploded on you because you're a dipshit who doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground.

Given the death penalty is still legal in the US and many states clearly breathing and a heartbeat ARE things that I have privilege to and the government can take away. Pretty sure I know which side of the capital punishment argument you land on. Care to spin the wheel again cupcake?

That doesn't implode my talking points. It cements them as facts you cannot dispute. You actually prove my points. The end of the day is all you've got are insults and hypocrisy. Sucks but there it is.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

A bitch wife ?

Domestic abusers always think she deserved it.