Trump's DUI Hire Texts War Plans to Journalist.

A list of Lit MAGATs who can/has/will justify this shit:
.
.
.
.
.



That's the list.
It won't be for lack of trying. We've already seen the "fake news" excuse. It's only a matter of time before Rightguide claims it's a Marxist plot somehow spearheaded by Nancy Pelosi or AOC, Icanthelpit blames it on illegal immigration, UltraChad says...something unintelligible except for "why do you hate white men and America so much?", TastySuckToy insists with a straight face that no one said anything to the Atlantic, and LanceCastro says something none of us even bothers to read because we're wondering why he wants everyone to look at that little kid's dick again.
 
It won't be for lack of trying. We've already seen the "fake news" excuse. It's only a matter of time before Rightguide claims it's a Marxist plot somehow spearheaded by Nancy Pelosi or AOC, Icanthelpit blames it on illegal immigration, UltraChad says...something unintelligible except for "why do you hate white men and America so much?", TastySuckToy insists with a straight face that no one said anything to the Atlantic, and LanceCastro says something none of us even bothers to read because we're wondering why he wants everyone to look at that little kid's dick again.
That's scary accurate 😲
 
Meanwhile, news this morning notes some GOP critters are downplaying the texting actual war plans to a journalist on a commercial and insecure platform. I guess dragging Hillary through a shitstorm of mud for having her own email server slipped their minds.
 
It won't be for lack of trying. We've already seen the "fake news" excuse. It's only a matter of time before Rightguide claims it's a Marxist plot somehow spearheaded by Nancy Pelosi or AOC, Icanthelpit blames it on illegal immigration, UltraChad says...something unintelligible except for "why do you hate white men and America so much?", TastySuckToy insists with a straight face that no one said anything to the Atlantic, and LanceCastro says something none of us even bothers to read because we're wondering why he wants everyone to look at that little kid's dick again.

#ThePerfectDescription
 
to determine your own bias on whether an action taken by the 'side' you support is a) dangerous, b) illegal, and c) cause for firing/punishment, first imagine your own reactions to the same situation if it was the 'other side's mistake.

I am pretty damned confident that most, if not all, democrats here would be loudly condemning any dem gov't official involved in this.
 
Find and watch Senator Bennet grilling Radcliffe

‘resident ‘rump won’t be happy!!
He will fry Bennet
But… he sure won’t fire Radcliffe
Will Radcliffe step down due to family needs??

And.. everything is under review …. We’ll share that report in 2028 or so… after midterms

Musk can eliminate all those SCIFs
They have Signal!! Total waste of money!!
Efficient disclosure of information to everyone !!

“I don’t recall” what was just published about my fuck up that was printed within the last 24 hours?? Fucking Fools!!!
Reagan couldn’t recall due to Alzheimer’s! These people we PAY have no excuse
 
Last edited:

from the above link:
At 11:44 a.m., the account labeled “Pete Hegseth” posted in Signal a “TEAM UPDATE.” I will not quote from this update, or from certain other subsequent texts. The information contained in them, if they had been read by an adversary of the United States, could conceivably have been used to harm American military and intelligence personnel, particularly in the broader Middle East, Central Command’s area of responsibility. What I will say, in order to illustrate the shocking recklessness of this Signal conversation, is that the Hegseth post contained operational details of forthcoming strikes on Yemen, including information about targets, weapons the U.S. would be deploying, and attack sequencing.

I have a couple of questions someone here might know the answers to:

Did Goldberg take screen shots of the classified or 'sensitive' posts like he did the rest?
If he did, would that mean he could be prosecuted for having possession of it?

I'm hoping he did take the screen shots, downloaded them onto a thumb drive and then cleared the information from his pc before anyone else could access it, so he can share the detailed proof with the Committee asking gabbard and the other one for the information. If their denials can be proven lies, it'd be huge. He would need to be very careful who he passed that drive onto, though, since coverups for the incompetence will be a priority. Would it even reach the committee?

If he would be liable to prosecution for having viewed sensitive material not intended for his eyes, I can only imagine (not being a lawyer) the bolded red text would form the bulk of that defense. Would the sensitive information even be allowed in a courtroom, given how it was secured by Goldberg? Just wondering aloud. I'm keen that the facts come out and am very wary that they would.
The Signal chat group, I concluded, was almost certainly real. Having come to this realization, one that seemed nearly impossible only hours before, I removed myself from the Signal group, understanding that this would trigger an automatic notification to the group’s creator, “Michael Waltz,” that I had left. No one in the chat had seemed to notice that I was there. And I received no subsequent questions about why I left—or, more to the point, who I was.
Earlier today, I emailed Waltz and sent him a message on his Signal account. I also wrote to Pete Hegseth, John Ratcliffe, Tulsi Gabbard, and other officials. In an email, I outlined some of my questions: Is the “Houthi PC small group” a genuine Signal thread? Did they know that I was included in this group? Was I (on the off chance) included on purpose? If not, who did they think I was? Did anyone realize who I was when I was added, or when I removed myself from the group? Do senior Trump-administration officials use Signal regularly for sensitive discussions? Do the officials believe that the use of such a channel could endanger American personnel?
How trust-diminishing is it that the person who should never have been included in the conversation that should never have happened over Signal have to be the one who informs the 'Tiger team' of his presence? If they cannot even notice one person in the small group in the text chats, how should we be convinced they can notice entire groups of hostiles threatening the USA?
 
to determine your own bias on whether an action taken by the 'side' you support is a) dangerous, b) illegal, and c) cause for firing/punishment, first imagine your own reactions to the same situation if it was the 'other side's mistake.

I am pretty damned confident that most, if not all, democrats here would be loudly condemning any dem gov't official involved in this.
I'd be wondering why they hadn't all quit already, every one of them.

Not even wait for the push; jump already.
 


When General McCaffrey says that he assumes that China and Russia have cracked Signal and other apps, he means that the US has cracked it and therefore why not everyone else.
 
Back
Top