MAGAts Will Ban Non-Approved Haircuts

[Bray123]

As The US moves another step along the road aligning with the Great Supreme Mobster's hero Kim Jong Un, who has imposed a list of 28 approved hairstyles that all citizens can choose from (apart from Kim himself who is exempt and has a style not on the list),

Republican lawmakers in Arkansas have introduced a bill that would allow lawsuits against anyone who facilitates a minor's social transition — including hairdressers and barbers who give gender-nonconforming haircuts

https://www.newsweek.com/arkansas-bill-targets-gender-nonconforming-haircuts-kids-2048152

How long before the Great Supreme Mobster issues his own list of haircuts (with his own hairstyle not included)?

 

[domroger]

As The US moves another step along the road aligning with the Great Supreme Mobster's hero Kim Jong Un, who has imposed a list of 28 approved hairstyles that all citizens can choose from (apart from Kim himself who is exempt and has a style not on the list),



https://www.newsweek.com/arkansas-bill-targets-gender-nonconforming-haircuts-kids-2048152

How long before the Great Supreme Mobster issues his own list of haircuts (with his own hairstyle not included)?

America,land of the oppressed.

 

[UltraChad]

As The US moves another step along the road aligning with the Great Supreme Mobster's hero Kim Jong Un, who has imposed a list of 28 approved hairstyles that all citizens can choose from (apart from Kim himself who is exempt and has a style not on the list),



https://www.newsweek.com/arkansas-bill-targets-gender-nonconforming-haircuts-kids-2048152

How long before the Great Supreme Mobster issues his own list of haircuts (with his own hairstyle not included)?

COMMON SENSE REGULATION!!!!!

America,land of the oppressed.

Only in blue shit holes, private property and civil rights are still a thing elsewhere.

 

[Chernosoth]

Bill pulled for revision. Maybe some of them will ask their kids about the consequences of legislating teen fashion.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

COMMON SENSE REGULATION!!!!!



Only in blue shit holes, private property and civil rights are still a thing elsewhere.

Why is do you think it’s “common sense” for the government to regulate hairstyles?

 

[UltraChad]

Why is do you think it’s “common sense” for the government to regulate hairstyles?

Why do you think it's "common sense" for the government to regulate gun accessories?? Speech??? Charge people rent on property they are supposed to own???

Same reason KarenCrats think it's "common sense" for THEIR totalitarian god state to micromanage literally every single aspect of everyone's lives from cradle to grave with as many regulations and alphabet agencies as THEY see fit and taxing the shit out of everyone for the privilege no matter how fucking absurd .......muh FEE FEES.

 

[butters]

As The US moves another step along the road aligning with the Great Supreme Mobster's hero Kim Jong Un, who has imposed a list of 28 approved hairstyles that all citizens can choose from (apart from Kim himself who is exempt and has a style not on the list),



https://www.newsweek.com/arkansas-bill-targets-gender-nonconforming-haircuts-kids-2048152

How long before the Great Supreme Mobster issues his own list of haircuts (with his own hairstyle not included)?

wthf?!!!

 

[Bray123]

Why is do you think it’s “common sense” for the government to regulate hairstyles?

If it's good enough for Kim, it's good enough for any self-respecting dictator dotard.

 

[Hel_Books]

Why do you think it's "common sense" for the government to regulate gun accessories?? Speech??? Charge people rent on property they are supposed to own???

Same reason KarenCrats think it's "common sense" for THEIR totalitarian god state to micromanage literally every single aspect of everyone's lives from cradle to grave with as many regulations and alphabet agencies as THEY see fit and taxing the shit out of everyone for the privilege no matter how fucking absurd .......muh FEE FEES.

Of course the government regulates speech.

If you lived in a society where speech was unregulated, someone could publish a book about you with AI faked photos of you molesting children and they could get away with it without penalty.

Or they could call the authorities and tell them you're barricaded in your house with a high-powered rifle and posters of Stephen Paddock.

Or they could call your mother and . . . well, you get the idea.

Do you want to live in a society like that?

 

[UltraChad]

Of course the government regulates speech.

If you lived in a society where speech was unregulated, someone could publish a book about you with AI faked photos of you molesting children and they could get away with it without penalty.

Or they could call the authorities and tell them you're barricaded in your house with a high-powered rifle and posters of Stephen Paddock.

Or they could call your mother and . . . well, you get the idea.

Do you want to live in a society like that?

We live in that society.......because speech isn't regulated.

You're just a psychotic totalitarian Karen.

The kind of HOA member that walks around the neighborhood every day putting a ruler on every lawn, sending pictures and getting fines for everyone that you possibly can, then can't imagine how you lost election to HOA enforcer for the 18th year in a row!!!

 

[Hel_Books]

We live in that society.......because speech isn't regulated.

You're just a psychotic totalitarian Karen.

The kind of HOA member that walks around the neighborhood every day putting a ruler on every lawn, sending pictures and getting fines for everyone that you possibly can, then can't imagine how you lost election to HOA enforcer for the 18th year in a row!!!

Of course the government regulates speech.

If you lived in a society where speech was unregulated, someone could publish a book about you with AI faked photos of you molesting children and they could get away with it without penalty.

Or they could call the authorities and tell them you're barricaded in your house with a high-powered rifle and posters of Stephen Paddock.

Or they could call your mother and . . . well, you get the idea.

Do you really believe you live in a society like that?

 

[UltraChad]

Of course the government regulates speech.

If you lived in a society where speech was unregulated, someone could publish a book about you with AI faked photos of you molesting children and they could get away with it without penalty.

Or they could call the authorities and tell them you're barricaded in your house with a high-powered rifle and posters of Stephen Paddock.

Or they could call your mother and . . . well, you get the idea.

Do you really believe you live in a society like that?

We live in that society.......because speech isn't regulated.

You're just a psychotic totalitarian Karen.

The kind of HOA member that walks around the neighborhood every day putting a ruler on every lawn, sending pictures and getting fines for everyone that you possibly can, then can't imagine how you lost election to HOA enforcer for the 18th year in a row!!!

 

[Hel_Books]

We live in that society.......because speech isn't regulated.
...

Yes, speech is regulated. Libel, harassment, child-porn, time-place-and-manner, etc. etc. etc. etc.

 

[RobDownSouth]

COMMON SENSE REGULATION!!!!!



Only in blue shit holes, private property and civil rights are still a thing elsewhere.

Arkansas is as red as your slimebrother Wat Tyler's neck, Angry Angry Chan.
Are you supporting the government's proposed attempt to regulate hair styles?
Doesn't appear to be 'common sense' to me but your tortured "but but dictionary sez" non-sequiturs are not often grounded in reality.

 

[UltraChad]

Yes, speech is regulated. Libel, harassment, child-porn, time-place-and-manner, etc. etc. etc. etc.

Exploitation and harassment aren't speech, libel isn't a criminal charge.

 

[UltraChad]

Arkansas is as red as your slimebrother Wat Tyler's neck, Angry Angry Chan.

So what, angry fat fat nigger?

Are you supporting the government's proposed attempt to regulate hair styles?

Common sense regulation isn't a problem!!!

Doesn't appear to be 'common sense' to me

Neither does hanging up a "gun free zone" sign to let all the psycho's know where to shoot up but that doesn't stop you (D)umb fucks from backing that forever bad policy.

but your tortured "but but dictionary sez" non-sequiturs are not often grounded in reality.

Someone is still ass hurt I didn't let them redefine terms to suit their dishonest bullshit....

 

[Hel_Books]

Exploitation and harassment aren't speech, libel isn't a criminal charge.

You have your definitions mixed up. If, for instance, you publish a libelous article, or send a harassing e-mail you are engaging in speech, just not speech that is protected by the law, and for which you may be punished.

You sound like those bible-thumpers who, when they hear a fellow bible-thumper has done something egregious, simply declare the scumbag "isn't a real Christian," while they should be saying (as C. S. Lewis does) that they are Christians, just bad ones.

 

[Hel_Books]

Neither does hanging up a "gun free zone" sign to let all the psycho's know where to shoot up but that doesn't stop you (D)umb fucks from backing that forever bad policy.

Always wondered why people in the USA think they're safer buried in an avalanche of firearms like Syria or Somalia, rather than being civilized like places like the UK (a few dozen gun homicides last year, compared to the USA with 498 mass shootings killing 16,545 with, of course lots and lots of other, less spectacular, gun deaths)

 

[UltraChad]

You have your definitions mixed up. If, for instance, you publish a libelous article, or send a harassing e-mail you are engaging in speech, just not speech that is protected by the law, and for which you may be punished.

Again, libel is a civil not criminal issue.

Harassment isn't speech, doesn't require it and is it's own separate category of criminal behavior.

You sound like those bible-thumpers who, when they hear a fellow bible-thumper has done something egregious, simply declare the scumbag "isn't a real Christian," while they should be saying (as C. S. Lewis does) that they are Christians, just bad ones.

Then you're reading what you want to read, not what I actually post.

Always wondered why people in the USA think they're safer buried in an avalanche of firearms like Syria or Somalia, rather than being civilized like places like the UK (a few dozen gun homicides last year, compared to the USA with 498 mass shootings killing 16,545 with, of course lots and lots of other, less spectacular, gun deaths)

Because we'd rather not be cucked and helpless like you guys.

You have less gun deaths but more crime and your children are being trafficked off........while your government looks the other way.

You can call that civilized all you like, I'm not buying it.

 

[dolf]

My son had hair down to his arse.
He raised hundreds for charity and donated it to make wigs for little girls with cancer and alopecia. And now he's in the military, doing manly shit.

My daughter had short hair.
It looked cute on her. It still looks cute on her. She cooks, she wears dresses, she paints her nails.

What is a "gender nonconforming hairstyle"? How does it harm kids?

 

[Hel_Books]

Again, libel is a civil not criminal issue.

Harassment isn't speech, doesn't require it and is it's own separate category of criminal behavior.



Then you're reading what you want to read, not what I actually post.



Because we'd rather not be cucked and helpless like you guys.

You have less gun deaths but more crime and your children are being trafficked off........while your government looks the other way.

You can call that civilized all you like, I'm not buying it.

You can be punished for libel because there are regulations on speech in civilized society. Some speech is harassment, and you can be punished for it because there are regulations on speech in civilized society. You're the one who lives in the country paranoid about traffickers from south of the Rio Grande as well as homegrown (remember the weird Pizzagate thing?).

 

[Typo Fu Master]

Why do you think it's "common sense" for the government to regulate gun accessories??

How did we go from hairstyles to a Constitutional amendment?

I used to have a ponytail down to my shoulder blades. I decided long hair was a pain in the ass to take care of. Now I like a crew cut. If I was a girl, would that be wrong? Who gets to decide what is appropriate with regards to hair style and length? Isn't that personal?

 

[glamorilla]

I hope this includes faux hawks and bowl haircuts

 

[Bray123]

You have less gun deaths but more crime and your children are being trafficked off........while your government looks the other way.

You can call that civilized all you like, I'm not buying it.

Nope.

The UK has far less crime than the US.

 

[RobDownSouth]

My son had hair down to his arse.
He raised hundreds for charity and donated it to make wigs for little girls with cancer and alopecia. And now he's in the military, doing manly shit.

My daughter had short hair.
It looked cute on her. It still looks cute on her. She cooks, she wears dresses, she paints her nails.

What is a "gender nonconforming hairstyle"? How does it harm kids?

Both of your kids chosen hairstyles represent a "clear 'n present danger' to the easily hurt feelings of the adherents of 'Toxic Masculinity' here in America (RightGuide, Bobo, and especially Wat Tyler).

Somewhat unusual for them, they never had an issue with AJ's long hair, probably because of his situational Native Murican heritage.