Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 67,281
It means many are lazy and take their jobs for granted.What does that even mean?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It means many are lazy and take their jobs for granted.What does that even mean?
I didn't say he was "free to go" merely that he continued to resist arrest therefore was NOT in "full custody and control."Let's see; he was in cuffs, had been placed into the car and removed again a couple of times, and was face down on the pavement with a uniformed police officer kneeling on him when he died.
At what point should we expect that he was no longer "free to go?"
Lies. He got a fair trial. You're exactly the kind of worthless animal who made a hero of George Zimmerman and Kyle Rittenhouse -- and, I am tempted to say, of Dylann Roof.
Productivity is not based on your ignorant opinionIt means many are lazy and take their jobs for granted.
Would you like to rework the construction of that sentence?Productivity is not based your ignorant opinion
ALL officers serve at the discretion of the president. I hope they have a Plan B for after their termination of service.There is evidence of efforts by some USAF units to ignore the executive order to eliminate DEI. This is an example from Minot (North Dakota) Air Force Base. Here, you have a memo that laughs at the executive order and clearly states they have renamed the office.
Minot Air Force Base is still doing DEI, but it is now called Organizational Culture Office to circumvent Trump's order
in what appears to be a possible trend in the Air Force, an email from the “Organizational Culture Office,” formerly the DEI office, was sent out to all of Luke AFB.
The US Air Force Academy has rebranded its DEI program as "Dignity Respect and Leadership" and is continuing on.
Removing this garbage from the military—and I'm under no illusion that the Air Force is unique in having commands that are surreptitiously telling the Commander-in-Chief to get lost—will require diligent effort and ruthlessness. Anyone involved in rebranding USAF DEI programs must be terminated if civilian or administratively separated if military. What we are seeing here is really nothing less than a mutiny.
It is good tho, because it makes it easy to identify those guilty and drum them out. Disobedience of an order comes under Article 92. A conviction of willful dereliction in performing duties may result in a bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for six months. I'm sure there's other charges possible
I foresee some wholesale exits ahead
https://redstate.com/streiff/2025/0...t-the-commander-in-chief-has-ordered-n2184765
Already did. One word doesn't not make it that difficult to read.Would you like to rework the construction of that sentence?
ALL officers serve at the discretion of the president. I hope they have a Plan B for after their termination of service.
Exactly. I wonder how many of those playing those games are civilian contractors?There'll be a lot of discretion to exercise and Hegseth will be the guy to do it.
You have no good reason to believe that.It means many are lazy and take their jobs for granted.
But civil servants don't. Project 2025 aims to undermine that, and that's one more reason it needs to be blocked.ALL officers serve at the discretion of the president.
I didn't say he was "free to go" merely that he continued to resist arrest therefore was NOT in "full custody and control."
Only a traitor would gloat over this like you're doing.Trump's national security adviser Mike Waltz has sent dozens of National Security Council staffers responsible for Ukraine, Iran and North Korea home, suspending them from their jobs. Jake Sullivan thought he was gonna embed Democrat scum in the NSC to sabotage Trump. He thought wrong.
Semantics and you misunderstand what "in custody" means. There is no such thing as "full custody" only "IN custody."
Once he was in custody, the State had an obligation to care for his needs. In this case that meant that his medical needs were a priority rather than tertiary or worse on the list of things the officers should have been doing.
Even combative, he could have been attended to. In fact he was already restrained. But, instead of doing what they were obligated to do, one officer knelt on his back while 4 others stood around doing nothing more than glaring at the crowd screaming at them to not kill their prisoner. And a man died.
Chauvin displayed a depraved heart. He was convicted because of it, not politics. I even said so at the time and nothing has changed to alter that opinion.
He would not have died if Chauvin had not knelt on his neck.OK, I'll cease that line.
1. The Medical Examiner edited her report to include "stress of arrest" contributing to 'cause of death." That addition was subjective and highly prejudicial. The cause of death was heart failure and high doses of Fentanyl and Meth. were found in his system. Further pre-existing heart damage was present. Further, neither asphyxiation nor Carotid Artery constriction were found to be contributing factors.
BullshitHe would not have died if Chauvin had not knelt on his neck.
You're exactly the kind of worthless animal who made a hero of George Zimmerman and Kyle Rittenhouse -- and, I am tempted to say, of Dylann Roof.