LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Today’s Political Drama~ musk & trump, nazi of the day, panama canal ,buy greenland, alien drones, abortions

Oh look. A new thread.

Aah, nvm, it's literally Lance manipulating thread titles to trick people.

Neat.

Can't wait till he deletes all of his posts here and lies about why
 
Lance_Castro said:
Before the election, Butters, Adrina and a few others were filling these pages with multiple new Trump Hate Threads every day…Nazi! Fascist! Existential Threat!

Trump & Abortions, their 2 favorite topics….how do you define that new clump of tissue you are carrying in your womb?

Is Obama Care good or is it Communism?

Someday will ALL American women have a penis?

What will be the next Minority Group people start yelling about?

But… the Butters & Adrina Bitchfest (featuring Roary & Rob!)…. Was boring, and just doesn’t work with the TRUMP team in power. So, they’ve Self-Cancelled their little “ everyone else is a NAZI!!!” Show.

~ ONE UNDENIABLE FACET OF ELECTING TRUMP IS HE TURNS THE POLITICAL NEWS CYCLE INTO THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER… more DRAMA more CIRCUS… MOAR!”

American Politics now has an ever increasing speed and increased Drama! Component…just to keep average american wage slaves distracted.

Alien drones, let’s repossess the Panama Canal…

God Bless America!

What’s Today’s Drama? Discuss! Have fun!
Click to expand...
Interesting observations but I think you left out the worst thing about Trump. His orange hair. As open-minded people that are "inclusive" it is clear that Trump is bad and should indeed be mocked because of his hair color. Failure to mock someone based on their hair color is a form of racism.
 
dawnonyou said:
Interesting observations but I think you left out the worst thing about Trump. His orange hair. As open-minded people that are "inclusive" it is clear that Trump is bad and should indeed be mocked because of his hair color. Failure to mock someone based on their hair color is a form of racism.
Click to expand...
1736091221704.jpeg
I thought it was an hommage to Le Grand Orange, Rusty Staub?
 
Lance_Castro said:

Trump files emergency petition to Supreme Court to prevent sentencing in NY v. Trump​

President-elect Donald Trump is set to be sentenced in New York v Trump on Jan 10​

https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2024/10/340/340/tjw6ja53_400x400.jpg?ve=1&tl=1
By Brooke Singman Fox News


Good luck with that!
Lol
Click to expand...

I think he's got a good argument from a legal standpoint.

He has appeals pending on his immunity based on the SCOTUS decision. Given that he may be immune from being tried, let alone convicted, for the 34 felonies, why should the sentencing go forward until we know the answer to the underlying question of whether he can be put on trial or not?

Further, the appellate courts have CONSISTENTLY ruled against Trump's appeals only to be reversed by SCOTUS. Taking their refusal to either hear his appeals, or denying them outright nearly immediately, only continues that long line of appellate courts being incorrect in their decisions when it comes to Trump.

In the end this is theater. None of this will prevent Trump from becoming the 47th President. What it is INTENDED to do, is ensure that he has difficulty administering the laws of the nation. Which makes what Merchan is doing unlawful at its core.

You cannot commit an illegal act in order to promote justice and the law. This is where the TDS afflicted currently stand when they support Bragg's case and Merchan's decisions.
 
HisArpy said:
I think he's got a good argument from a legal standpoint.

He has appeals pending on his immunity based on the SCOTUS decision. Given that he may be immune from being tried, let alone convicted, for the 34 felonies, why should the sentencing go forward until we know the answer to the underlying question of whether he can be put on trial or not?

Further, the appellate courts have CONSISTENTLY ruled against Trump's appeals only to be reversed by SCOTUS. Taking their refusal to either hear his appeals, or denying them outright nearly immediately, only continues that long line of appellate courts being incorrect in their decisions when it comes to Trump.

In the end this is theater. None of this will prevent Trump from becoming the 47th President. What it is INTENDED to do, is ensure that he has difficulty administering the laws of the nation. Which makes what Merchan is doing unlawful at its core.

You cannot commit an illegal act in order to promote justice and the law. This is where the TDS afflicted currently stand when they support Bragg's case and Merchan's decisions.
Click to expand...
I was listening to judge Napolitano's (Ret) opinion, he didn't think SCOTUS would rule on Trump's case.

In my opinion this would set a new precedent and allow lower courts to abuse power without the relief. IMHO
 
icanhelp1 said:
I was listening to judge Napolitano's (Ret) opinion, he didn't think SCOTUS would rule on Trump's case.

In my opinion this would set a new precedent and allow lower courts to abuse power without the relief. IMHO
Click to expand...

SCOTUS is well known for sitting on their hands and doing nothing. that doesn't mean Trump's argument isn't valid. Only that SCOTUS refuses to do its job and control the lower courts.
 
HisArpy said:
SCOTUS is well known for sitting on their hands and doing nothing. that doesn't mean Trump's argument isn't valid. Only that SCOTUS refuses to do its job and control the lower courts.
Click to expand...
I totally agree that Trump's argument is a valid one. I hope Trump's team pushes for a SCOTUS hearing. Having a felony conviction could affect his future life after his term has ended. Bragg, Merchan, James should all be disbarred. Bragg should be charged with subornation of perjury just for starters. imho.
 
icanhelp1 said:
I totally agree that Trump's argument is a valid one. I hope Trump's team pushes for a SCOTUS hearing. Having a felony conviction could affect his future life after his term has ended. Bragg, Merchan, James should all be disbarred. Bragg should be charged with subornation of perjury just for starters. imho.
Click to expand...

It affects his ability to be President because some nations bar convicted felons from going there. If Trump cannot go, for example, as part of a State Visit to the UK, then he cannot act on our behalf as President.

THAT is the overriding concern and it is the underlying root reason Merchan is pushing to sentence him before the inauguration.
 
Imagine, if you will, a legal system where you can be sentenced for not committing a crime. *cue Twilight Zone theme*
 
HisArpy said:
It affects his ability to be President because some nations bar convicted felons from going there. If Trump cannot go, for example, as part of a State Visit to the UK, then he cannot act on our behalf as President.

THAT is the overriding concern and it is the underlying root reason Merchan is pushing to sentence him before the inauguration.
Click to expand...
Well, with what you said, how can SCOTUS possibly justify not ruling. This purely interferes with the execution of official presidential duties. NY appellate courts are just as corrupt.

Maybe the new AG can or will request a writ of certiorari.
 
icanhelp1 said:
Well, with what you said, how can SCOTUS possibly justify not ruling. This purely interferes with the execution of official presidential duties. NY appellate courts are just as corrupt.

Maybe the new AG can or will request a writ of certiorari.
Click to expand...

Like I said, SCOTUS is well known for sitting on their hands and doing nothing.
 
Phhhht… Trump wasnt president when he splooged on Stormy Daniels or when he paid her to stay quiet.

So the immunity argument is a non starter.

He needs to shut the fuck up and take his lumps.

Not that he will, the blowhard.

He lost that one. Boo hoo.

He whines nearly as much as the Libtards here!

Lol
 
The MAGA SCOTUS will sit on their hands for as long as Harlan Crow pays them to do that. And when Crow ducks out, Musk will take over. He won't waste the money and effort already expended by not doing that.
 
Rebel5soul said:
Imagine, if you will, a legal system where you can be sentenced for not committing a crime. *cue Twilight Zone theme*
Click to expand...

🙄

Good thing that ^ did NOT happen in DonOld’s “Stormy Daniels case”.

DonOld was - Indicted for his crimes. - Tried in a court of law in front of a jury of his peers. - Subjected to that jury’s deliberations. - Convicted by that jury of his peers. - and DonOld will now be sentenced by the Judge in that court of law.

NOTHING about that ^ belongs in a “Twilight Zone” episode. (Maybe in a “Bizarro (MAGA) World Twilight Zone” episode.)

Hope that ^ helps.

👍

🇺🇸
 
Bray123 said:
The MAGA SCOTUS will sit on their hands for as long as Harlan Crow pays them to do that. And when Crow ducks out, Musk will take over. He won't waste the money and effort already expended by not doing that.
Click to expand...
Where do you get your mushrooms?
 
Lance_Castro said:
Phhhht… Trump wasnt president when he splooged on Stormy Daniels or when he paid her to stay quiet.

So the immunity argument is a non starter.
Click to expand...

It's actually not. The SCOTUS immunity decision was clear that acts of the President cannot be used as evidence. The hush money trial used testimony of WH staff and confidential WH memos and emails to prove the case against Trump.

None of that can be used because it's part of Presidential immunity. Yet it was. Which means he does have a strong immunity argument.

His argument against being prosecuted after being elected is also strong. Without that shield against criminal prosecution, any State could convict the President elect and imprison him to prevent his taking office prior to him being officially sworn in.
 
Lazaran said:
🙄

Good thing that ^ did NOT happen in DonOld’s “Stormy Daniels case”.

DonOld was - Indicted for his crimes. - Tried in a court of law in front of a jury of his peers. - Subjected to that jury’s deliberations. - Convicted by that jury of his peers. - and DonOld will now be sentenced by the Judge in that court of law.

NOTHING about that ^ belongs in a “Twilight Zone” episode. (Maybe in a “Bizarro (MAGA) World Twilight Zone” episode.)

Hope that ^ helps.

👍

🇺🇸
Click to expand...

And if those conviction are overturned on appeal? What will you say then? That the courts you insist are unbiased enough for his convictions to have solid foundations, have somehow maga-ically become corrupt?
 
HisArpy said:
And if those conviction are overturned on appeal? What will you say then? That the courts you insist are unbiased enough for his convictions to have solid foundations, have somehow maga-ically become corrupt?
Click to expand...

🙄

It’s like Derpy hasn’t seen all the damning evidence against the rapey, racist, fascist, misogynistic, corrupt orange traitor, and Derpy pretends that ALL the cases that were brought against DonOld weren’t ALL on “solid foundations”.

😑

👉 Derpy 🤣

🇺🇸
 
Did you know:

Trump is the first President to actually lose net worth while serving in the White House
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

THROBBS
ABC Exhausting, though not Exhaustive
Replies
9
Views
8K
Sunlover102
Sunlover102
Back
Top