Nate Silver shows how leftists think like communists, not like human beings

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
66,985

Nate Silver shows how leftists think like communists, not like human beings​

By Andrea Widburg


Stalin famously said, “a single death is a tragedy; a million deaths are a statistic.” This is the statist bean-counter’s view of human life. Humans are sort of like widgets, existing to serve the needs of the state. It is a view antithetical to that expressed in the Constitution, which pivots around each person’s value in the eyes of God:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
I thought of Stalin’s words when I read what Nate Silver, the statistician, had to say about the fact that an illegal alien allegedly set a woman alight on the New York City subway. Just to get the facts straight, the illegal alien was kicked out of the country on Trump’s watch and sneaked back in on Biden’s watch. He lived for free in a homeless shelter while somehow managing to support a $ 30-a-day drug habit, in addition to drinking heavily.

Over the weekend, this man allegedly murdered a woman on the subway by setting her on fire. Then, he sat and watched as she burned. If you want to know how she died, read the following tweet, but I warn you that it will haunt you in your dreams:


He gets down to the point here:https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nk_like_communists_not_like_human_beings.html

This was a terrible human tragedy. I blame Joe Biden, the Communist.
 
If you set somebody on fire to kill them, you are not thinking of that person as a statistic.
 

Nate Silver shows how leftists think like communists, not like human beings​

By Andrea Widburg


Stalin famously said, “a single death is a tragedy; a million deaths are a statistic.” This is the statist bean-counter’s view of human life. Humans are sort of like widgets, existing to serve the needs of the state. It is a view antithetical to that expressed in the Constitution, which pivots around each person’s value in the eyes of God:


I thought of Stalin’s words when I read what Nate Silver, the statistician, had to say about the fact that an illegal alien allegedly set a woman alight on the New York City subway. Just to get the facts straight, the illegal alien was kicked out of the country on Trump’s watch and sneaked back in on Biden’s watch. He lived for free in a homeless shelter while somehow managing to support a $ 30-a-day drug habit, in addition to drinking heavily.

Over the weekend, this man allegedly murdered a woman on the subway by setting her on fire. Then, he sat and watched as she burned. If you want to know how she died, read the following tweet, but I warn you that it will haunt you in your dreams:


He gets down to the point here:https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nk_like_communists_not_like_human_beings.html

This was a terrible human tragedy. I blame Joe Biden, the Communist.
Noticed you didn't blame the fella with the lighter who sat and watched. Is he a communist, also?

The horrific tragedy of this woman’s death deserves compassion and reflection, not partisan blame. Linking a senseless act of violence to Joe Biden as "Communist" oversimplifies systemic issues like homelessness, mental health, and immigration reform—issues that span multiple administrations. Instead of divisive rhetoric, we should focus on humane solutions to prevent such suffering in the future.

It seems you have no compassion for her but chose to use her death as a club or as a political foil.
 
Last edited:
Communist politics do not, of course, have anything to do with an open-borders immigration policy. Communist countries have always had really tight border control.
 
Noticed you didn't blame the fella with the lighter who sat and watched. Is he a communist, also?

The horrific tragedy of this woman’s death deserves compassion and reflection, not partisan blame. Linking a senseless act of violence to Joe Biden as "Communist" oversimplifies systemic issues like homelessness, mental health, and immigration reform—issues that span multiple administrations. Instead of divisive rhetoric, we should focus on humane solutions to prevent such suffering in the future.

It seems you have no compassion for her but chose to use her death as a club or as a political foil.
Every time there’s a school shooting, as terrible as that is, Democrats do the very same thing ‘ politicize the event. Hypocrite. You Dems don’t blame the shooter you blame the firearm.
 
Every time there’s a school shooting, as terrible as that is, Democrats do the very same thing ‘ politicize the event. Hypocrite. You Dems don’t blame the shooter you blame the firearm.
We blame the shooter and blame his access to firearms.

Nobody blames the firearm. We do recognize that the type of firearm is a factor in the number of deaths. For example, we recognize that if the suspect has a knife, the number of deaths is always smaller.
 
Every time there’s a school shooting, as terrible as that is, Democrats do the very same thing ‘ politicize the event. Hypocrite. You Dems don’t blame the shooter you blame the firearm.
You began this discussion with political grandstanding, invoking Stalin and Nate Silver and equating Democrats with communists, all to frame a tragedy as a partisan weapon. Now, you accuse Democrats of politicizing gun violence while offering no solutions yourself. If your issue is with blaming firearms, then what’s your workable plan to address the systemic problems behind the violence—whether it’s mental health, community safety, or access to deadly weapons? Pontificating solves nothing. If you’re serious about preventing tragedies, let’s hear your ideas for real, actionable change instead of more self-aggrandizing rhetoric.

You could get off your soapbox, preacher. You can just roll up your sleeves and offer workable solutions. Or, are you just going to take the Trumpian stand of 'I have a concept of a plan' and run away from reality, leaving others to handle what you pontificate over?
 
You began this discussion with political grandstanding, invoking Stalin and Nate Silver and equating Democrats with communists, all to frame a tragedy as a partisan weapon. Now, you accuse Democrats of politicizing gun violence while offering no solutions yourself. If your issue is with blaming firearms, then what’s your workable plan to address the systemic problems behind the violence—whether it’s mental health, community safety, or access to deadly weapons? Pontificating solves nothing. If you’re serious about preventing tragedies, let’s hear your ideas for real, actionable change instead of more self-aggrandizing rhetoric.

You could get off your soapbox, preacher. You can just roll up your sleeves and offer workable solutions. Or, are you just going to take the Trumpian stand of 'I have a concept of a plan' and run away from reality, leaving others to handle what you pontificate over?

Well Democrats do politicize gun violence whenever it's convenient for them....and they are communist.

There are plans, just not ones you and the other "BANNING GUNS WORKS!!" lunatics who can't see anything other than banning guns as an option will accept. Because you guys don't believe in self defense rights.
 
Well Democrats do politicize gun violence whenever it's convenient for them....and they are communist.
Since there isn't frequent events, this isn't a issue 👍

There are plans, just not ones you and the other "BANNING GUNS WORKS!!" lunatics who can't see anything other than banning guns as an option will accept. Because you guys don't believe in self defense rights.
Guy who has never had a single gun taken away speaks about plans that he's talked about for over a decade to take away his guns.


Tell us more
 
Since there isn't frequent events, this isn't a issue 👍

Ok...LOL

Guy who has never had a single gun taken away speaks about plans that he's talked about for over a decade to take away his guns.


Tell us more

A totally not Democrat tries to pretend Democrats aren't anti-gun, haven't been actively trying everything in their power to restrict gun rights and wouldn't ban guns if they could...despite them openly saying as much.

Cope harder comrade. :D (y) (y)
 
Ok...LOL



A totally not Democrat tries to pretend Democrats aren't anti-gun, haven't been actively trying everything in their power to restrict gun rights and wouldn't ban guns if they could...despite them openly saying as much.
I'm anti ease of use killing large numbers of people weapons being in the hands of crazy fuckers.

You might not be against that.
 
I'm anti ease of use killing large numbers of people weapons being in the hands of crazy fuckers.

You might not be against that.

So you just want to ban guns like every other fuckin' democrat.

You're just too much of a fucking pussy to come out and say it, like usual.
 
So you just want to ban guns like every other fuckin' democrat.
However you need to understand it, is fine.

You're just too much of a fucking pussy to come out and say it, like usual.
Nope. I literally want to stop crazy fuckers from having access to big killing weapons.

But you generalize, so the explanation is lost on you.
 
You began this discussion with political grandstanding, invoking Stalin and Nate Silver and equating Democrats with communists, all to frame a tragedy as a partisan weapon. Now, you accuse Democrats of politicizing gun violence while offering no solutions yourself. If your issue is with blaming firearms, then what’s your workable plan to address the systemic problems behind the violence—whether it’s mental health, community safety, or access to deadly weapons? Pontificating solves nothing. If you’re serious about preventing tragedies, let’s hear your ideas for real, actionable change instead of more self-aggrandizing rhetoric.

You could get off your soapbox, preacher. You can just roll up your sleeves and offer workable solutions. Or, are you just going to take the Trumpian stand of 'I have a concept of a plan' and run away from reality, leaving others to handle what you pontificate over?
On many occasions I've put forward what some remedies could be, just tired of repeating myself. One remedy is strictly enforcing gun laws that are already on the books. One recent step towards cleaning up gun violence is holding Parents liable for prosecution if their children are involved in gun violence. Need to patrol the internet when dealing with under age access.

BTW I never mentioned Stalin.
 
Well Democrats do politicize gun violence whenever it's convenient for them....and they are communist.

There are plans, just not ones you and the other "BANNING GUNS WORKS!!" lunatics who can't see anything other than banning guns as an option will accept. Because you guys don't believe in self-defense rights.
Here... take my dose of Lactulose... you need it more than I do. I ask for some reasoned plan, and you go straight to shit in defense of the guy I addressed—the simian brothers sparring today.
 
However you need to understand it, is fine.

It is what it is.

Yup.

I literally want to stop crazy fuckers from having access to big killing weapons.

And how do you suppose that happens???
But you generalize, so the explanation is lost on you.

It's not even a generalization it's just a matter of critical thinking......you can't have what you want without getting in line with the gun grabbing Democrats.

Again, you're just too much of a fuckin' pussy to own what you are.
 
It is what it is.


Yup.



And how do you suppose that happens???
By not letting crazy fuckers have weapons.

It's not even a generalization it's just a matter of critical thinking......you want to stop access to guns. How do you plan on doing that???
Lots of ways.

The way I'm not advocating for is to let every crazy fucker have access to guns.
 
Back
Top