Will Kim Attack The ROK Before Biden Leaves Office?

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
56,428

The Real Reason North Korea Is Threatening War​

With Kim Jong-un’s recent statements that he considers the Republic of Korea (ROK) the “primary enemy” and no longer seeks peaceful unification, analysts in Korea and the United States are rightly concerned with the possibility that he may conduct an unprecedented provocation or even an attack on the ROK.

by Ri Jong Ho David Maxwell

Despite the wealth of speculation about Kim Jong-un, he can be described simply as a leader with no strategic vision and a reckless thinker, making him unpredictable to a certain extent. On the other hand, he can only follow the seven decades-old “playbook” of the Kim family regime.


Kim Jong-un has been advocating that the nation’s strength and the happiness of its people lie in a powerful nuclear capability since the early days of his regime. However, after more than ten years in power, the country’s economy and people’s lives have been devastated due to Kim’s decisionmaking.

Kim Jong-un’s major dilemma is how to lead the country while possessing nuclear weapons. He lacks any vision for ensuring the well-being of the people through his nuclear weapons program. If he truly desires the prosperity and happiness of the nation, he must abandon nuclear weapons and embrace a market economy. However, he fears that opening the country will lead to the collapse of his regime. This is Kim Jong-un’s paradox. On the other hand, he is emboldened by “ungrounded confidence,” which makes him dangerous.

“Ungrounded Confidence”

Putin’s war in Ukraine and Kim’s buoyed relationship with Putin have made the former feel strong. However, the actions and non-actions of the United States throughout the world raised Kim’s confidence in his ability to act without fear of retribution. This really began with the withdrawal from Iraq, the lack of a response to the invasion of Crimea in 2014 and later in 2022 in Ukraine, and the deal with the Taliban and bungled Afghanistan withdrawal. This impression was reinforced by the unsure and tepid responses to continued Russian aggression, Hamas’ terrorist attack in Israel, and Houthi attacks in the Red Sea. Perhaps most importantly, Kim sees Congressional dysfunction, particularly the blocking of military aid to Ukraine and Israel, as a telling signal of irresolution.

More here: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/korea-watch/real-reason-north-korea-threatening-war-209331

With weakness exposed by events in Ukraine and elsewhere tempt the rotund tyrant?
 

The Real Reason North Korea Is Threatening War​

With Kim Jong-un’s recent statements that he considers the Republic of Korea (ROK) the “primary enemy” and no longer seeks peaceful unification, analysts in Korea and the United States are rightly concerned with the possibility that he may conduct an unprecedented provocation or even an attack on the ROK.
lol, you're really worried about a war with Korea? Mind you, he is crazy enough to use a Nuke and think he can survive.
 
Maybe 45 can arrange a date night to cool his jets.
 
No, he will wait and see if Trump gets back in office, in which case he knows he can rub Trump's tummy and get him to roll over and do nothing, or even work in his favor.
Trump controlled Kim's aggressiveness, get it right by waking the fuck up.
 
Stop with the bullshit.
Sorry you don't like reality. Kim didn't change anything he was doing for longer than a few months. But hey, at least he was able to successfully test missiles that can hit California .. good job 45!

Donald Trump’s North Korea Gambit: What Worked, What Didn’t, and What’s Next

By the end of Trump’s term, the talks had petered out and he had little more to show for his efforts than a drawer full of flattering letters. For all of the talk of their great personal relationship, Kim Jong Un had only advanced his capabilities once again. At a military parade in October, he rolled out his biggest intercontinental ballistic missile yet, immediately dubbed the “monster missile” by analysts. Donald Trump could only add his name to the list of American presidents who had tried and failed to curb North Korea’s nuclear ambitions before him.
 
Fat Kim likes to keep himself in the news... Like Butt boy Lindsey Graham
 
Trump controlled Kim's aggressiveness, get it right by waking the fuck up.
Lol, just like he prevented Putin from invading Ukraine by his magical presence.

This caught my attention from the op quote: Perhaps most importantly, Kim sees Congressional dysfunction, particularly the blocking of military aid to Ukraine and Israel, as a telling signal of irresolution.

^^^ That would be republican dysfunction blocking military aid. Please note that Rightguide, as in isolationism has consequences affecting US security. It helps us at home to have a strong presence elsewhere.
 
Is he after another pay off?

Worst case scenario is coordinating with China. China's economy is collapsing and the natives are restless, Xi might think that starting a war would unite the natives. We are currently in the process of re-configuring our forces for peer level warfare as opposed to asymmetric warfare and between Ukraine and the mid-east we're stretched thin. If Xi were to decide that this is the time to move on Taiwan AND get little Kim to move on S. Korea at the same time we'd be in deep shit.
 
Lest we forget, Trump also brought us within an inch of pulling our missile defenses out of South Korea. The only reason why he didn't was that a staffer took a memo off his desk, having guessed correctly that Trump would forget about the issue if he didn't see it again.
 
For at least the 55 years I can remember out of the 62 some communist or m00hamedan jackalope has been gumming dick about "Death to America" and whatever. I was hoping that with generic viagra more widely available that the globalist could finally get it up and do something

Was this your grand dream and vision?
 
Lest we forget, Trump also brought us within an inch of pulling our missile defenses out of South Korea. The only reason why he didn't was that a staffer took a memo off his desk, having guessed correctly that Trump would forget about the issue if he didn't see it again.
Do you have any authoritative source for that assertion or is this just another "unnamed source" hunk of bullshit? I postulate that it is the latter. Source up or fuck off.
 
Do you have any authoritative source for that assertion or is this just another "unnamed source" hunk of bullshit? I postulate that it is the latter. Source up or fuck off.

Trump considered ‘complete withdrawal’ of US troops from South Korea, former defense chief says​

https://www.stripes.com/theaters/as...esident-trump-south-korea-troops-5954121.html
Trump controlled Kim's aggressiveness, get it right by waking the fuck up.
Negotiations to set South Korea's contribution for the cost under the Special Measures Agreement had stalled for years under Trump, only to be settled soon after Joe Biden took office in January 2021
 
So no authoritative source.

By the way shit for brains, "considered" is not doing. "Considered" is nothing more than exploring ALL alternatives.
 
So no authoritative source.

By the way shit for brains, "considered" is not doing. "Considered" is nothing more than exploring ALL alternatives.
lol you drinking early today???

Lest we forget, Trump also brought us within an inch of pulling our missile defenses out of South Korea. The only reason why he didn't was that a staffer took a memo off his desk, having guessed correctly that Trump would forget about the issue if he didn't see it again.

Do you have any authoritative source for that assertion or is this just another "unnamed source" hunk of bullshit? I postulate that it is the latter. Source up or fuck off.


So no authoritative source.

By the way shit for brains, "considered" is not doing. "Considered" is nothing more than exploring ALL alternatives.

with in an inch= considered.....
 
So no authoritative source.

By the way shit for brains, "considered" is not doing. "Considered" is nothing more than exploring ALL alternatives.
Thanks for admitting that me and YDB are correct. A rare moment of clarity for you, Schlitz for Brains.
 
Do you have any authoritative source for that assertion or is this just another "unnamed source" hunk of bullshit? I postulate that it is the latter. Source up or fuck off.
It’s in one of Bob Woodward’s, a Pulitzer Prize winner and one of the the duo who uncovered the Nixon watergate scandal, books on the trump presidency, and if I recall correctly, he does name names. He’s written books on each president since Nixon, I think.
 
It’s in one of Bob Woodward’s, a Pulitzer Prize winner and one of the the duo who uncovered the Nixon watergate scandal, books on the trump presidency, and if I recall correctly, he does name names. He’s written books on each president since Nixon, I think.
Nobody died at Watergate.......unlike "fast and furious".......
 
Back
Top