SimonDoom
Kink Lord
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2015
- Posts
- 15,772
Yes, but in terms of dramatic arcs, the Atreides coming to Dune up to the crash in the desert is an obvious one, and this was very much the basis for both films. It's not clear to me that the rest can be divided neatly into two to make a satisfying middle movie.
I agree. Novel 1 is a two-parter. There's no way to end a middle part of the Dune story in a satisfactory way. And it would just be padding the story, like The Hobbit did. The Hobbit was a modest children's book and Jackson turned it into a bloated trilogy. I found myself counting the minutes during the final battle with the orcs. I got annoyed with the CGI, just as I did during the Star Wars prequel trilogy.
That wasn't the case with Dune. The visuals were great. But there's something missing. There's no humor in Dune. There are no light moments. No moments that make you connect with the characters. A book can get away with that, but it's harder for a movie to do so. I don't think carving up the story differently would make any difference. I thought Villanueve did about as good a job as one could do, but it still felt like there was something missing.