What Democrats and colonialists have in common

SugarDaddy1

Literotica Guru
Joined
Dec 6, 2012
Posts
1,901
The Left preaches tolerance but excoriates those who disagree with it. It claims to seek equality or its conveniently and endlessly malleable derivative, equity, but gives preferences unequally to favored groups. It brags that it’s a passionate defender of democracy but works to cancel legitimate votes by making fraudulent voting easier. It arrogates “science” to its partisan causes but rejects the facts of gender, abortion, genetically modified foods, COVID-19, economics, and much else. The list of hypocritical disparities stretches to somewhere over the rainbow.

But one disparity is perhaps weirder and more glaring than all the others. It is on the issue that obsesses the Left most of all — that of race. White gentry liberals, who run the Democratic Party and lead its militant base, are utterly out of sync with the racial minorities they claim to represent and insist they want to help.

One should not be surprised that the Left’s leaders and ideologues are out of step, or that they think hoi polloi should do what they are told and accept things they do not believe. That is the way they treat all ordinary Americans. But on the issue of race, this knowing-better-than-thou attitude sits particularly uncomfortably, for it smacks strongly of the paternalistic arrogance of colonialism that, in theory at least, the modern Left detests.

Does this not ring true of those who currently run Washington, the universities, and most of the national news media? Take up the liberal burden/ Go teach the Leftist creed/ Send out your pseudo-scholars/ Our captive people need/ The care of justice warriors/ Who will plant the good woke seed.
Source
 
What Democrats and colonialists have in common is that most of both are white.
 
SugarDaddy1: So here we have yet ANOTHER new Rightguide/Counselor706 handle. This is getting pretty fucking out of hand. Don't you incels have anything better to do beside troll a forum under half a million different user names? (and even respond to your own threads with your bullshit sock puppet accounts?)
 
Honestly this shit lost me when it was brought up that we should be tolerant of intolerance. Once someone crosses that particular bridge the only correct answer is to burn it behind them and call it a lifetime.
 
It brags that it’s a passionate defender of democracy but works to cancel legitimate votes by making fraudulent voting easier.

I'm sure even you will agree that that statement pretty much torpedoes the credibility of this author.
 
It's historical fact, the main points of which is the written testimony of William Bradford himself which are quoted therein. Educate yourself.

Rush says he's getting all this from "a story in the Federalist." Not a place to look for historical fact.

I know enough about the history of Plymouth Colony to know that the collectivism was not a problem, and not something from which Bradford's division of property saved anybody. What killed so many Pilgrims that first winter was simply lack of food, since they had not brought enough along with them and did not yet know enough about local conditions to farm successfully. They weren't even prepared for Massachusetts -- their plan was to land in Virginia, but the Mayflower was blown off course.
 
Last edited:

Please PLEASE show us some fraudulent voting !!!
More AMERICANS voting is a good thing
Did they vote for Trump? No
Wtf is wrong with you?
Look at all the Republican WINS!
Dumb fuck
Was your vote tossed by a legislature??!
Did you have to stand in line for hours??!
That would be a stolen election
Ignore!
 
What Democrats and colonialists have in common is that most of both are white.

And the problem is? If I went to Africa and complained that the country was mostly black, do you think it would raise an eyebrow?

How stupid does one need to be to believe this BS.
 
Yet another #grievancePorn to rally the base by the examiner.
 
It's historical fact, the main points of which is the written testimony of William Bradford himself which are quoted therein. Educate yourself.

Indeed, I have a set of volumes, "The Annals of America" that has Bradford's account in it. They tried communism and died.
 
And the problem is? If I went to Africa and complained that the country was mostly black, do you think it would raise an eyebrow?

How stupid does one need to be to believe this BS.

The point is, that's pretty much the only thing Democrats have in common with colonialists. The OP is bullshit.
 
The point is, that's pretty much the only thing Democrats have in common with colonialists. The OP is bullshit.

Spot on...it is laughable that conservatives have re-written the history to blame a socia-economic system as the cause of the starvation in the Plymouth Colony when it was squarely....

-scurvy and disease as a result of the trip across the Atlantic
-the multifaceted problems of arriving in Plymouth with few resources; inadequate dwellings for the New England winter, inability to grow enough food mostly due to a lack of understanding the local lands and conditions for growing success and exacerbated by the weakened state most of the Pilgrims were in upon arrival.

But, conservatives have a hard on for Socialism so they believe things that only favor their narritive of authoritarianism.
 
Rush says he's getting all this from "a story in the Federalist." Not a place to look for historical fact.

I know enough about the history of Plymouth Colony to know that the collectivism was not a problem, and not something from which Bradford's division of property saved anybody. What killed so many Pilgrims that first winter was simply lack of food, since they had not brought enough along with them and did not yet know enough about local conditions to farm successfully. They weren't even prepared for Massachusetts -- their plan was to land in Virginia, but the Mayflower was blown off course.

That's a lie.
 
Back
Top