I left my first wife.
My second is firmly ensconced herein, why do you ask?
Do you have any nude pictures of her?
If not, would you like to buy some?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I left my first wife.
My second is firmly ensconced herein, why do you ask?
Here Phrodeau...lemme help. This is from this new year even:
The administration's new exploration policy giving more say to the energy firms about decision about where to explore and the financial decisions that go into that:
Economic Times
That sounds great doesn't it?
Oh, so this is what you meant a few minutes ago when you mentioned Googling for confirmation bias. Thanks for the helpful example.
Oh, so this is what you meant a few minutes ago when you mentioned Googling for confirmation bias. Thanks for the helpful example.
Query follows in the footsteps of his mentor, Vetty.
President Obama's energy policies result in 5 1/2 year low for oil
The foresight and leadership of President Obama has resulted in $57 a barrel oil prices.
This is great news for America!
Pretty much. Like I've said before, if President Obama personally cured cancer today, Vetteman, query and busybody would all be here tomorrow lamenting the loss of good paying oncologist jobs that occurred on President Obama's watch.
#AscriptionAgain
He's a textbook example of epistemic closure, i.e. "disregard inconvenient facts!"
I think at some level he understands this, but he doesn't want to jeopardize his budding relationships with his new "bros" Ishmael and AJ, so he can't admit it.
Does Q-Bert not understand that consumer confidence and economic growth can contribute increased oil production without a policy?
Why not both?
Query follows in the footsteps of his mentor, Vetty.
Have a snickers bar
The wait will be #long
Two weeks is nuthin
I been waitin since 2004 when I first axed him to explain 2 of his deliberate misleading comments
Sure have a lot to say, don't you? But not word one about any policies that curtailed oil production.
Would you care to admit that Obama's policies made no difference one way or the other? It seems like you're giving up on making any other point.
Sure have a lot to say, don't you? But not word one about any policies that curtailed oil production.
Would you care to admit that Obama's policies made no difference one way or the other? It seems like you're giving up on making any other point.
Sure have a lot to say, don't you? But not word one about any policies that curtailed oil production.
Would you care to admit that Obama's policies made no difference one way or the other? It seems like you're giving up on making any other point.
He seems rather enamored of the sound of his own voice.
Poor query.....he tries sooo very hard.
The thread title is "President Obama's energy policies result in 5 1/2 year low for oil". The first post is "The foresight and leadership of President Obama has resulted in $57 a barrel oil prices. This is great news for America! " Where does he say that policies were designed for increasing production? Whose premise would it be, if you're the one who made it up?(edited)
Care to look at the top of the page?
He is saying that policies of the Obama Administration were designed for and had the effect of increasing oil production, when that is patently false.
Do try and follow along. This is Robbie's thread, Robbie's indefensible premise.
Saying that Obama had a single pro-production policy in place or action taken as he has asserted with this thread is nonsense.
The thread title is "President Obama's energy policies result in 5 1/2 year low for oil". The first post is "The foresight and leadership of President Obama has resulted in $57 a barrel oil prices. This is great news for America! " Where does he say that policies were designed for increasing production? Whose premise would it be, if you're the one who made it up?
On the other hand, you made an assertion that there are "state policies that have the effect of curtailing production" without providing any evidence, then ask which ones were reversed. That may be a defensible premise, but you haven't done it yet.
WHAT fucking direction would production HAVE to be in order for the FUCKING price to go DOWN?
If Obama is to get the fucking CREDIT his POLICIES would have to have influenced the increased production.
If fucking a = fucking b and b = fucking c than fucking a= FUCKING C.
Is there some OTHER factor other than INCREASED PRODUCTION that you can point to that could POSSIBLY have resulted in the precipitous drop in prices?????
You are starting to sound like Sgt Mushroom. I always assumed you were related.
FUCKING ROB has not even uttered one FUCKING WORD in defense of HIS FUCKING thesis and it is my job to prove the obverse when he JUST complained tonight that I cannot use an opposing example to make an argument???
Do YOU, Phrodeaux HONESTLY believe that ANY fucking thing the administration did lowered the price ONE FUCKING DOLLAR?
REALLY???????????????????
That's what happens when he attributes positions to others that he can't support.
That's what happens when he attributes positions to others that he can't support.