koalabear
~Armed and Fuzzy~
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2001
- Posts
- 101,964
At least you're man enough to take a shot at me without hiding behind your ignore button.
Now you sound like perg/mercmoron.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At least you're man enough to take a shot at me without hiding behind your ignore button.
I ask again, if Obamacare is so great, why would even one doctor consider quitting over it? We should be seeing medical school enrollment going up. And I don't mean foreign students coming from third world shitholes where even Obamacare sounds better than what they have.
And that means, what?Because stupid is not confined to fear mongers on a porn board?
Merc's compulsion to lash out and call names was probably fueled by his intense hatred of conservatives and capitalism rising to the surface. If he really felt the article was misleading it would have been easy to remain calm and simply point out any perceived errors. But no, he chose to knee-jerk react and call names and use profanity.
I ask again, if Obamacare is so great, why would even one doctor consider quitting over it? We should be seeing medical school enrollment going up. And I don't mean foreign students coming from third world shitholes where even Obamacare sounds better than what they have.
And that means, what?
Are you implying that it's stupid for doctors to want nothing to do with Obamacare? Please explain.
Oh, I have to read this.signatory to A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism
I ask again, if Obamacare is so great, why would even one doctor consider quitting over it?
<derp snip>
I ask again, if Obamacare is so great, why would even one doctor consider quitting over it? We should be seeing medical school enrollment going up.
And that means, what?
Are you implying that it's stupid for doctors to want nothing to do with Obamacare? Please explain.
Obamacare was not designed to help further line the pockets of doctors. It was designed to help lessen the number of uninsured and undersinsured people in the United States.
As such, we're going to see more people on bare bones programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. Doctors don't make as much profit (if any) on these patients, so they are pouting.
Florida urologist Jack Cassell posted a sign on his office door reading, "If you voted for Obama ... seek urologic care elsewhere. Changes to your health care begin right now, not in four years."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/02/jack-cassell-doctor-refus_n_523076.html
Of those surveyed, 83% "have considered leaving their practices over President Barack Obama’s health care reform law." If it's so damn good, why would even one doctor consider quitting the field?
http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/09/r...idered-quitting-over-obamacare/#ixzz20DuJlQTd
Nevertheless, no M.D. in America is actually going to be made working-poor by this reform.
Besides your dog, where's your proof to the contrary?
The truth be known! The wonder of Canadian state run medical care:
Report: Thousands fled Canada for health care in 2011
Published: 3:17 PM 07/11/2012
A Canadian study released Wednesday found that many provinces in our neighbor to the North have seen patients fleeing the country and opting for medical treatment in the United States.
The nonpartisan Fraser Institute reported that 46,159 Canadians sought medical treatment outside of Canada in 2011, as wait times increased 104 percent — more than double — compared with statistics from 1993.
Specialist physicians surveyed across 12 specialties and 10 provinces reported an average total wait time of 19 weeks between the time a general practitioner refers a patient and the time a specialist provides elective treatment — the longest they have ever recorded.
In 2011, Canadians enrolled in the nation’s government-dominated health service waited long periods of time for an estimated 941,321 procedures. As many as 2.8 percent of Canadians were waiting for treatment at any given time, according to the Institute.
“In some cases, these patients needed to leave Canada due to a lack of available resources or a lack of appropriate procedure/technology,” according to the Institute. “In others, their departure will have been driven by a desire to return more quickly to their lives, to seek out superior quality care, or perhaps to save their own lives or avoid the risk of disability.”
Increases in the number of patients leaving Canada for treatment were seen in seven of the ten Canadian provinces: British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador.
“Some of these patients will have been sent out of country by the public health care system due to a lack of available resources or the fact that some procedures or equipment are not provided
in their home jurisdiction,” the report concluded.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/11/report-thousands-fled-canada-for-health-care-in-2011/
The truth be known! The wonder of Canadian state run medical care:
Report: Thousands fled Canada for health care in 2011
Published: 3:17 PM 07/11/2012
A Canadian study released Wednesday found that many provinces in our neighbor to the North have seen patients fleeing the country and opting for medical treatment in the United States.
The nonpartisan Fraser Institute reported that 46,159 Canadians sought medical treatment outside of Canada in 2011, as wait times increased 104 percent — more than double — compared with statistics from 1993.
Specialist physicians surveyed across 12 specialties and 10 provinces reported an average total wait time of 19 weeks between the time a general practitioner refers a patient and the time a specialist provides elective treatment — the longest they have ever recorded.
In 2011, Canadians enrolled in the nation’s government-dominated health service waited long periods of time for an estimated 941,321 procedures. As many as 2.8 percent of Canadians were waiting for treatment at any given time, according to the Institute.
“In some cases, these patients needed to leave Canada due to a lack of available resources or a lack of appropriate procedure/technology,” according to the Institute. “In others, their departure will have been driven by a desire to return more quickly to their lives, to seek out superior quality care, or perhaps to save their own lives or avoid the risk of disability.”
Increases in the number of patients leaving Canada for treatment were seen in seven of the ten Canadian provinces: British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador.
“Some of these patients will have been sent out of country by the public health care system due to a lack of available resources or the fact that some procedures or equipment are not provided
in their home jurisdiction,” the report concluded.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/11/report-thousands-fled-canada-for-health-care-in-2011/
Many of their hospitals and medical facilities simply closed their doors, leaving no medical care for miles to those who now had 'free care', but no available medical facility to use it. The cause in nearly all cases was the crippling effect of the economics of 'free medical care'.
The loser Obama is proven to be a liar of the first order once again:
Obamacare Now Estimated to Cost $2.6 Trillion in First Decade
11:29 AM, JUL 11, 2012 • BY DANIEL HALPER
The Republican side of the Senate Budget Committee will later today release the following chart, detailing the rising projected cost of President Obama's signature legislation, Obamacare:
The latest estimate, as the chart details, is that Obamacare will cost $2.6 trillion dollars in its first real decade. The bill does not fully go into effect until 2014, therefore the estimate begins with that year.
"President Obama promised a joint session of Congress in 2009 to spend $900 billion over ten years on his health care law: 'Now, add it all up, and the plan that I’m proposing will cost around $900 billion over 10 years.' Adding up all the different spending provisions in the health care law, however, (including closing the Medicare 'donut hole,' implementation costs, and other spending) total gross spending over the FY 2010–19 period is about $1.4 trillion, based on CBO estimates," the Senate Budget Committee Republican staff explains. "And most of the major spending provisions in the law do not even take effect until 2014. Congressional Democrats delayed these provisions in order to show only six years of spending under the plan in the original 10-year budget window (from FY2010-19) used by CBO at the time the law was enacted. Therefore, the original estimate concealed the fact that most of the law’s spending only doesn’t even begin until four years into the 10-year window. A Senate Budget Committee analysis (based on CBO estimates and growth rates) finds that that total spending under the law will amount to at least $2.6 trillion over a true 10-year period (from FY2014–23)—not $900 billion, as President Obama originally promised."
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs...ted-cost-26-trillion-first-decade_648413.html