richard_daily
Slut Whisperer
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Posts
- 36,898
If the Democrats want to lose seats next election gun control is the perfect solution
they need to stop running anti-gun candidates.
Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Ohio all have a huge amount of law-abiding gun-owning folks who do not want to see their rights infringed. These are the battleground states. Now, it might not make as much of a difference in the mid-terms, but people don't just re-set and forget what a political party has done every election. Actions have consequences, and continuously running anti-2nd Amendment candidates is at least a mitigating factor in why we have Trump now.
Democrats need to run candidates with a history of actually doing actionable good for the people, rather than stuff from 30-40 years ago, before they "got into" politics.
Pelosi needs to go, as do a lot of the old guard who are completely out of touch with the average american.
Love it or hate it, populism has a broad appeal, whether it's leftist or right-wing populism.
they need to stop running anti-gun candidates.
Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Ohio all have a huge amount of law-abiding gun-owning folks who do not want to see their rights infringed. These are the battleground states. Now, it might not make as much of a difference in the mid-terms, but people don't just re-set and forget what a political party has done every election. Actions have consequences, and continuously running anti-2nd Amendment candidates is at least a mitigating factor in why we have Trump now.
Democrats need to run candidates with a history of actually doing actionable good for the people, rather than stuff from 30-40 years ago, before they "got into" politics.
Pelosi needs to go, as do a lot of the old guard who are completely out of touch with the average american.
Love it or hate it, populism has a broad appeal, whether it's leftist or right-wing populism.
Last edited: