ifrtbttrflys
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2016
- Posts
- 378
Created as the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) to conduct foreign intelligence activities during World War II, the Central Intelligence Agency has today become a rogue outfit whose leadership is infamously loyal to whichever President happens to be in Office and which casually operates today in every sphere of domestic America; i.e., the CIA has become as partisanly politically corrupt as virtually every other apparatus in the federal government, an as equally intent on pursuing a grossly anti-individual liberty agenda.
The essence of intelligence, of information, is its truth, and the further you slide from truth, the less the intelligence is effective. When information is gathered, collated, and then presented in any partisan way, it no longer is information - it is simply propaganda. Ron Paul is not only admired for calling to End the Fed, an equally corrupt, politically partisan outfit, Paul also proposed to End the CIA because of what is has pollutedly become.
I don't hold much hope for Trump's pick to head the CIA - Republican, U.S. Representative from Kansas, Mike Pompeo - to do anything to change the CIA's leadership environment of partisanship to the President, and Pompeo's draconian stances on issues like torture and Edward Snowden are practical abominations to the production of the truth itself, while being very conducive to simply more partisan propaganda.
If I was President, I would propose the complete demolition of the CIA, with a new agency charged with ONLY foreign intelligence operating ability to be created under the umbrella of the Department of Defense. Overall civilian intelligence responsibility is just fine now as headed by the Office of National Intelligence, with domestic investigation and enforcement handled just as competently by the FBI. Put America's foreign intelligence operating agency under military authority and accountability.
Short that now, I am hopeful President-elect Trump's grand trio of mighty military intelligence will serve to be not only great checks on CIA Director-nominee Pompeo's obvious partisanship, but will also be stout leaders in steering America's foreign intelligence operations back much, much closer to the side of truthful intelligence instead of partisan propaganda: Secretary of Defense-nominee Mattis and Secretary of DHS-nominee Kelly are perhaps the unarguable best choices for those critical positions with are served greatest by objectiveness.
Maybe the best shot in the arm for inoculation against the despicably corrupt partisanship which infects so much of the federal government today is Trump's choice of retired Lt. Gen. Flynn as his National Security Advisor, a man of integrity who was fired by Obama simply because he refused to support Obama's propaganda agenda. And how does Mr. Flynn view the CIA? Well, if you dare believe The New York Times, read for yourself:
Michael Flynn Is Harsh Judge of C.I.A.’s Role
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/12/us/politics/donald-trump-cia-michael-flynn.html
Sidebar:
While surfing, I came across this exchange @ https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-...ting-within-the-borders-of-the-United-States:
Sorry you clicked on this thread, yet?
The essence of intelligence, of information, is its truth, and the further you slide from truth, the less the intelligence is effective. When information is gathered, collated, and then presented in any partisan way, it no longer is information - it is simply propaganda. Ron Paul is not only admired for calling to End the Fed, an equally corrupt, politically partisan outfit, Paul also proposed to End the CIA because of what is has pollutedly become.
I don't hold much hope for Trump's pick to head the CIA - Republican, U.S. Representative from Kansas, Mike Pompeo - to do anything to change the CIA's leadership environment of partisanship to the President, and Pompeo's draconian stances on issues like torture and Edward Snowden are practical abominations to the production of the truth itself, while being very conducive to simply more partisan propaganda.
If I was President, I would propose the complete demolition of the CIA, with a new agency charged with ONLY foreign intelligence operating ability to be created under the umbrella of the Department of Defense. Overall civilian intelligence responsibility is just fine now as headed by the Office of National Intelligence, with domestic investigation and enforcement handled just as competently by the FBI. Put America's foreign intelligence operating agency under military authority and accountability.
Short that now, I am hopeful President-elect Trump's grand trio of mighty military intelligence will serve to be not only great checks on CIA Director-nominee Pompeo's obvious partisanship, but will also be stout leaders in steering America's foreign intelligence operations back much, much closer to the side of truthful intelligence instead of partisan propaganda: Secretary of Defense-nominee Mattis and Secretary of DHS-nominee Kelly are perhaps the unarguable best choices for those critical positions with are served greatest by objectiveness.
Maybe the best shot in the arm for inoculation against the despicably corrupt partisanship which infects so much of the federal government today is Trump's choice of retired Lt. Gen. Flynn as his National Security Advisor, a man of integrity who was fired by Obama simply because he refused to support Obama's propaganda agenda. And how does Mr. Flynn view the CIA? Well, if you dare believe The New York Times, read for yourself:
Michael Flynn Is Harsh Judge of C.I.A.’s Role
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/12/us/politics/donald-trump-cia-michael-flynn.html
Sidebar:
While surfing, I came across this exchange @ https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-...ting-within-the-borders-of-the-United-States:
What are the rules on the CIA operating within the borders of the United States?
I thought that when the CIA was formed, it was to work exclusively outside the U.S. (like British MI6) and that protection within the US was the province of the FBI (like MI5) This week I watched the season finale of Covert Affairs, the first three episodes of Homeland season 1 (didn't care for it), and two episodes of Burn Notice. In each of these, the CIA functions as a federal super law enforcement agency. Granted that these are TV shows (and fairy tales), has the legal situation of the CIA changed, or have the TV producers gotten it wrong, or just don't care?
Drachir, Former Analyst at U.S. Department of Defense
Written 15 Nov
That's none of your business honestly. For your own peace of mind have faith in the most clandestine agency in the world and don't go digging too deep because you'll wind up with malware on your transmission/reception device. There's a lot of click bait and social engineering attacks geared towards people researching the agency.
Sorry you clicked on this thread, yet?