I admit, I copied this from the GB...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/bradford/7204543.stm

A couple was banned from the bus station because her being on a leash was deemed dangerous. The couple view it as discrimination.

I am curious as to what you all have to say about it. Seems more fitting here, at least to me.

And for whatever reason it did make me smile a wee bit. Yay for us!

I hate it when ostensibly healthy white youngsters capable of holding a job make themselves visually un-hireable and collect welfare because of it. Begging crusty punks can eat my shit.

(I've worked with crusties and goths in some places that will hire - laziness doesn't come with the mods)

That said - busdriver is a bit freakin' unstable.

This is a response to the original article, which mentions that they live in council housing and collect dole for a living.

This was shown in a few other posts here, and it was since put onto the Goth Girls thread. It was being discussed over there last i knew.

My main question is why were they assumed Goth?

Its not like its general term which applies to anything non vanilla. Or is it?

i think they were assumed Goth by their style of dress. Kinda like if i wore a flannel shirt and work boots people would assume butch.

That said, from the article they both seem reasonably intelligent and healthy. They need to get jobs.

HottieMama said:

Kinda like if i wore a flannel shirt and work boots people would assume butch.

Click to expand...

*runs away with that mental image*