LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

BBC Reality Star Faces Jail for Saying Down Syndrome Babies Should Be ‘Put Down’…

D

DSpeeGal

Loves Spam
Joined
Oct 30, 2015
Posts
783
BBC Reality Star Faces Jail for Saying Down Syndrome Babies Should Be ‘Put Down’…

Pressgrave Ursula - UK reality show star

She should have just called for them to be aborted, which would have made her a hero and provided a major career boost.

Via Daily Mail:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ck-Facebook-message-born-s-Syndrome-down.html

The call centre worker, who appeared alongside Nev Wilshire in the BBC Three fly-on-the-wall series, was arrested after police also found photos joking about the disabled on her phone, Swansea Magistrates’ Court heard.


hey free specch? WHATS THAT?:confused:
 
A BBC reality TV star could be jailed for posting on Facebook that children born with Down's Syndrome should be 'put down'.
Ursula Presgrave - who appeared on BBC3's The Call Centre - was taken to court after saying disabled children should be killed instead of living the 'pointless life of a vegetable'.
The 23-year-old pleaded guilty to an offence under the Malicious Communications act and now faces a maximum sentence of six months in jail or a £5,000 fine.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ssage-born-s-Syndrome-down.html#ixzz3qdHiSorl
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
Free speech is the "right" to criticize your government and it's policies. Not call for the murder of handicapped people.

Didn't Hitler operate gas wagons for mentally challenged individuals.

It's only loud mouth obnoxious and very stupid people who think otherwise. To think you an just open you mouth and let filth flow from it is despicable.

There are people out there who would promote man/boy love affairs as proper, that what colour your skin is determines who you are, that euthanizing challenged people is right, that guns are good.

These are the folk who should be put away.

Put the pedos, the racists and the Nazi types all on one island.

Then nuke the fuckers.
 
DSpeeGal said:
BBC Reality Star Faces Jail for Saying Down Syndrome Babies Should Be ‘Put Down’…

Pressgrave Ursula - UK reality show star

She should have just called for them to be aborted, which would have made her a hero and provided a major career boost.

Via Daily Mail:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ck-Facebook-message-born-s-Syndrome-down.html

The call centre worker, who appeared alongside Nev Wilshire in the BBC Three fly-on-the-wall series, was arrested after police also found photos joking about the disabled on her phone, Swansea Magistrates’ Court heard.


hey free specch? WHATS THAT?:confused:
Click to expand...

God sent the Muslims to put down the Brits.
 
NOIRTRASH said:
God sent the Muslims to put down the Brits.
Click to expand...

So you admit Muslims are God's children and do his work? Careful there are some really stupid and ignorant folk here who will jump all over you for remarks like that. Real hateful fuckers too.
 
Rubbish

1. She is not a star, i have never heard of her.

2. The story was in the Mail ( gutter press) never believe anything they write.
 
The right to freedom of expression is recognized as a human right under article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and recognized in international human rights law in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Article 19 of the ICCPR states that "everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference" and "everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice".

Article 19 additionally states that the exercise of these rights carries "special duties and responsibilities" and may "therefore be subject to certain restrictions" when necessary "[f]or respect of the rights or reputation of others" or "[f]or the protection of national security or of public order (order public), or of public health or morals".

In philosophy, moral responsibility is the status of morally deserving praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or omission, in accordance with one's moral obligations.[1][2] Deciding what (if anything) counts as "morally obligatory" is a principal concern of ethics.

Philosophers refer to people who have moral responsibility for an action as moral agents. Agents have the capability to reflect on their situation, to form intentions about how they will act, and then to carry out that action. The notion of free will has become an important issue in the debate on whether individuals are ever morally responsible for their actions and, if so, in what sense. Incompatibilists regard determinism as at odds with free will, whereas compatibilists think the two can coexist.

Moral responsibility does not necessarily equate to legal responsibility. A person is legally responsible for an event when a legal system is liable to penalise that person for that event. Although it may often be the case that when a person is morally responsible for an act, they are also legally responsible for it, the two states do not always coincide.[

One of the attributes defined for psychopathy is "failure to accept responsibility for own actions".

The Declaration of Human Duties and Responsibilities (DHDR) was written for reinforcing the implementation of human rights under the auspices of the UNESCO and the interest of the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights and was proclaimed in 1998 "to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights"(UDHR) in the city of Valencia. Therefore, it is also known as the Valencia Declaration.

Considering that the major challenge for this new century is the effective and efficient realisation of human rights for all people, and that at the same time is needed that all members of the human family strive for its fulfilment, the DHDR formulates related duties and responsibilities for our current interdependence. Its preamble states categorically: The effective enjoyment and implementation of human rights and fundamental freedoms is inextricably linked to the assumption of the duties and responsibilities implicit in those rights.....
 
A little more than 10 years later, I still would have been in jail for having made fun of special education students.
 
bluemoves01 said:
1. She is not a star, i have never heard of her.

2. The story was in the Mail ( gutter press) never believe anything they write.
Click to expand...

The story is real and in plenty of other news sources besides the Mail.
Just because you've never heard of someone doesn't mean they aren't a star or used to be one. She is a former star of the show. Nobody but you disputes that.
 
phrodeau said:
The Malicious Communications Act of 1988 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malicious_Communications_Act_1988 makes what she did a crime.

It makes no difference if it's unconstitutional, because the UK doesn't have one.
Click to expand...

Still a law enacted by a duly democratically elected popular government. Some people are just sore losers.

Constitutions are like "Under New Management" signs over shops. An old family business run by original proprietor's descendants don't need to rebrand. If the product speaks for itself. In this case freedom, equality and democracy.
 
meanwhile

a British "Judge" just freed 3 Mossefucks who were accused of RUNNING DOWN and BEATING another in an attempt at HONOR KILLING
 
Hard_Rom said:
The right to freedom of expression is recognized as a human right under article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and recognized in international human rights law in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Article 19 of the ICCPR states that "everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference" and "everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice".

Article 19 additionally states that the exercise of these rights carries "special duties and responsibilities" and may "therefore be subject to certain restrictions" when necessary "[f]or respect of the rights or reputation of others" or "[f]or the protection of national security or of public order (order public), or of public health or morals".

In philosophy, moral responsibility is the status of morally deserving praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or omission, in accordance with one's moral obligations.[1][2] Deciding what (if anything) counts as "morally obligatory" is a principal concern of ethics.

Philosophers refer to people who have moral responsibility for an action as moral agents. Agents have the capability to reflect on their situation, to form intentions about how they will act, and then to carry out that action. The notion of free will has become an important issue in the debate on whether individuals are ever morally responsible for their actions and, if so, in what sense. Incompatibilists regard determinism as at odds with free will, whereas compatibilists think the two can coexist.

Moral responsibility does not necessarily equate to legal responsibility. A person is legally responsible for an event when a legal system is liable to penalise that person for that event. Although it may often be the case that when a person is morally responsible for an act, they are also legally responsible for it, the two states do not always coincide.[

One of the attributes defined for psychopathy is "failure to accept responsibility for own actions".

The Declaration of Human Duties and Responsibilities (DHDR) was written for reinforcing the implementation of human rights under the auspices of the UNESCO and the interest of the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights and was proclaimed in 1998 "to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights"(UDHR) in the city of Valencia. Therefore, it is also known as the Valencia Declaration.

Considering that the major challenge for this new century is the effective and efficient realisation of human rights for all people, and that at the same time is needed that all members of the human family strive for its fulfilment, the DHDR formulates related duties and responsibilities for our current interdependence. Its preamble states categorically: The effective enjoyment and implementation of human rights and fundamental freedoms is inextricably linked to the assumption of the duties and responsibilities implicit in those rights.....
Click to expand...

Contrary to what Turdeau would have you believe, the UN has its collective heads up its ass.
 
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. That's isn't right. You shouldn't face jail or down state time for speaking your mind. It should be your actions that place you in jail, not your words.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Another story for feedback
Replies
1
Views
357
where
W
TANG GOD
For all you unawaring anti-racist
Replies
13
Views
1K
sterlingclay
sterlingclay
riff
For SINthia: Deviant Behavior in Online Multimedia Communities
Replies
7
Views
1K
SINthysist
SINthysist
Spermaceti
Lizard King information
Replies
0
Views
1K
Spermaceti
Spermaceti
T
Mudslinging for the Non-Christian Bad man Jerry Falwell
Replies
2
Views
409
Todd
T
Back
Top