JuanSeiszFitzHall
yet another
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2019
- Posts
- 962
My first story on Lit was posted yesterday. I've seen mentions now and then on this forum of the relationship among viewing, actual reading, voting, comments, and so forth. Still, I was surprised to see what the stats showed after the first day:
1274 views, 7 votes.
I haven't linked to the story here because I won't beg for feedback (although I suppose it would be easy to find the story by going to my profile, and I won't try to dissuade anyone who's really interested). I believe that I already know why the reader response hasn't been strong: Instead of starting by introducing characters, developing their relationship gradually, and then setting up a sex scene with slow disrobing and observation/appreciation of revealed anatomy, I put a sex act in the first sentence. There was character development over time, but with sex at least an initially known quantity for the characters.
I've inferred from what I've read here that Lit readers prefer a slow build (and longer content generally; this story is about 3600 words, and it fit on one Lit page). I write a story in whatever way interests me, and this one seemed to me to work best this way. To be honest, I have no desire to write specifically to gain the approval of Lit's (apparently very large) readership.
Back to my original point: Is the disparity between views and votes caused by the dropoff between views and full reads? Might readers flag stories for later reading and voting? Would a quick scroll to the end turn people away because the story is so short? (That seems to run counter to recent indications that erotica buyers on paid-content sites may prefer short stories.) Anyway, I welcome any theories and explanations.
1274 views, 7 votes.
I haven't linked to the story here because I won't beg for feedback (although I suppose it would be easy to find the story by going to my profile, and I won't try to dissuade anyone who's really interested). I believe that I already know why the reader response hasn't been strong: Instead of starting by introducing characters, developing their relationship gradually, and then setting up a sex scene with slow disrobing and observation/appreciation of revealed anatomy, I put a sex act in the first sentence. There was character development over time, but with sex at least an initially known quantity for the characters.
I've inferred from what I've read here that Lit readers prefer a slow build (and longer content generally; this story is about 3600 words, and it fit on one Lit page). I write a story in whatever way interests me, and this one seemed to me to work best this way. To be honest, I have no desire to write specifically to gain the approval of Lit's (apparently very large) readership.
Back to my original point: Is the disparity between views and votes caused by the dropoff between views and full reads? Might readers flag stories for later reading and voting? Would a quick scroll to the end turn people away because the story is so short? (That seems to run counter to recent indications that erotica buyers on paid-content sites may prefer short stories.) Anyway, I welcome any theories and explanations.