- Joined
- Dec 4, 2017
- Posts
- 6,491
‘just over an hour’? Precision does not seem to be called for.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Colorful flower boxes hung in front of most windows and a large sign over the door proclaimed it to be “Miss Millie's House of Respite”.
Not sure if I should open up a new thread, but I have a small punctuation issue of my own.
I know when writing dialogue, the punctuation has to go inside the quotation marks. But what about this?
It's clearly not dialogue, but my editor insists that punctuation always has to go inside quotation marks. I'd like a second (or fifth) opinion here, please.
I use single quotes for things like movie, song or TV show titles or names on inanimate objects.
So, my initial posting was correct? Since it was descriptive text, NOT dialogue, the period goes outside the quotes?
As asked, the double quotes go outside the end punctuation.
I know when writing dialogue, the punctuation has to go inside the quotation marks. But what about this?
So, my initial posting was correct? Since it was descriptive text, NOT dialogue, the period goes outside the quotes?
A I know the AP style guide allows for the possibility of punctuation outside of quotation marks...
No. Look again. I posted that the quote marks go OUTSIDE the end punctuation in your example--if you are using American style (which is what the Web site uses).
U.S. Fiction style authority is The Chicago Manual of Style (as it is for general nonfiction)
UK fiction style authority is the Oxford Manual of Style
[/B]
I bet you're a two-spaces-after-a-period kinda fella, aren't you Keith?
No, I'm not, which, if you had been here for any length of time, you'd know. Beyond that, you and others asked a question, and I gave you a professional editor's response. I can do without the snide amateurism. If you don't want a "best practice" answer, don't ask the questions. Just go off and do your own thing and then advise others to go down the wrong paths with you.
The orange Chicago manual was the 15th one, two manuals ago.
So, I bet you're the kind of writer who thinks you know everything about publishing because you own a computer.
It was snide no matter why it was posted. I don't buy the "haha" interpretation.
If "I know it all by osmosis or something" amateur writers want to screw up doing their own thing is one thing; advising other writers to do it as well is quite another.
Law has the Uniform System of Citation, known as the "Blue Book." It's important because of the significance of identifying citations, i.e., case or other authority for the proposition one is making.U.S. Fiction style authority is The Chicago Manual of Style (as it is for general nonfiction)
UK fiction style authority is the Oxford Manual of Style
The APA style (American Psychological Association) manual is for humanistic sciences.
The AP (Associated Press) and the New York Times style guides are for journalism.
The GPO manual is for general U.S. government reports.
The Style Manual and Writers Guide for Intelligence Publications is for U.S. intelligence research papers
The MLA (Modern Language Association) handbook is for research papers and literary criticism.
Kate Turabian's A Manual for Writers is for college research papers.
Strunk and White's The Elements of Style is for high school themes.
We are writing fiction here.
Keith, there was nothing snide intended in my response, and you have my sincere apologies that it came across that way.
I changed careers and left the publishing industry years ago. I was there long enough to form opinions, but I'd never claim to know it all. I have nothing but respect for the professionalism you bring to the AH and the advice you give away for free. I am sorry that I expressed my opinion in a way that made you think otherwise.