Never forget what feminism is really about

What does my wondering about Osbourne and Clinton have to do with a song I put it, the latter being at best, half-seriously?
 
What does my wondering about Osbourne and Clinton have to do with a song I put it, the latter being at best, half-seriously?

What does Osbourne's hypothetical endorsement of Clinton have to do with the previous three pages of discussion, or the OP?
 
Okay, I haven't deeply read this thread, but it seems LJ or this Honey Badger took a link where a bunch of women joked about some woman cutting off a guy's penis, and he's, if you will, milking it for all it's worth, yammering about feminists and how you feminists hate us males.

You post a lot of stuff, likely attempting to be rational, and given what I've read of your stuff in other threads, you're probably doing at least a decent job of it.

Now this clip is the type of catnip that gets the alt-right all riled up, and might have helped President Dumbass get elected, and if Osbourne endorsed Clinton, it might not have help your (presumed) cause—i.e. getting Ms. Dares-not-publicly-use-the-words-"Armenian-Genocide"-or-"military-coup-in-Egypt" because Dumbass would be worse. If Clinton took any possible support from these women, it might have been a few a kisses of death for her.

lovecraft68's flippant remark is indicative that some women don't get it, and might help another GOP win in 2020.


(Btw, another thought: what if she didn't cut off his penis, but blinded him?)
 
Okay, I haven't deeply read this thread, but it seems LJ or this Honey Badger took a link where a bunch of women joked about some woman cutting off a guy's penis, and he's, if you will, milking it for all it's worth, yammering about feminists and how you feminists hate us males.

You post a lot of stuff, likely attempting to be rational, and given what I've read of your stuff in other threads, you're probably doing at least a decent job of it.

Now this clip is the type of catnip that gets the alt-right all riled up, and might have helped President Dumbass get elected, and if Osbourne endorsed Clinton, it might not have help your (presumed) cause—i.e. getting Ms. Dares-not-publicly-use-the-words-"Armenian-Genocide"-or-"military-coup-in-Egypt" because Dumbass would be worse. If Clinton took any possible support from these women, it might have been a few a kisses of death for her.

lovecraft68's flippant remark is indicative that some women don't get it, and might help another GOP win in 2020.


(Btw, another thought: what if she didn't cut off his penis, but blinded him?)

Whatever.
And I have absolutely no idea why you think Clinton getting elected was 'my cause'.
(a) Not my circus, not my monkeys.
(b) If it were my circus, I would have backed Sanders.

... and also, that's an astoundingly long bow to draw. Do you think anyone other than LJ remembers this incidents - it happened years ago.
 
Okay, I haven't deeply read this thread, but it seems LJ or this Honey Badger took a link where a bunch of women joked about some woman cutting off a guy's penis, and he's, if you will, milking it for all it's worth...
LJ is a straight-up troll, occasionally amusing, usually ignorable. Chains are yanked. Furious responses are crafted. The troll is well fed. Urp. Me, I try to avoid pig-wrestling. Mostly.
 
And I have absolutely no idea why you think Clinton getting elected was 'my cause'.
Now I don't have any immediate link-able sources, but I figure most feminists were/are more sympathetic to Clinton than Trump, and while I can't quote you saying "I am a feminist," I kinda get the feeling you are. Ergo, while Ms. really-didn't-help-the-Haitians-much might not be your first choice in the American election, I betcha liked her better than Trump (as do I), much like I figure you preferred who-ever-was-the-Labour leader than Theresa.
Not my circus, not my monkeys.
Yeah, but some of these videos might be seen by folks across the Atlantic, and might cause more trouble for Labour—and likely the SD-Liberals.
If it were my circus, I would have backed Sanders.
I was more partial to Stein or Johnson, but Sanders did endorse Clinton.
:D
... and also, that's an astoundingly long bow to draw. Do you think anyone other than LJ remembers this incidents - it happened years ago.
I just saw this video today, buy if LJ saw it, probably others have too.

Lot's of good miners—on all sides.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_Kieu
 
LJ is a straight-up troll, occasionally amusing, usually ignorable. Chains are yanked. Furious responses are crafted. The troll is well fed. Urp. Me, I try to avoid pig-wrestling. Mostly.
Should I spam any pages here KG's not on with porn? I luv posting porn.
 
Sounds good to me. But not centaur pr0n. Absolutely no centaur pr0n. Well, maybe just a little...

Since the topic is penises, I'm thinking a very hairy centaur with a very equestrian erection. The women needn't have sex with him, they can simply ride him—like the one I think in that Summer Romance movie with Daryl Hannah—the metaphor would hardly be missed.
 
Start a poll, asking if people think that you are a sad, angry man... let's see how it plays out and what "the truth" is.

:rolleyes:

You won't do it, because you KNOW the truth.

If you don't think you need therapy, you have a more serious problem than I realize. "Always getting the last word" doesn't mean that you're right. It means that you're a pig-headed idiot.

Why won't you start a poll, LT?

Afraid of the truth?


Are you claiming that you're still married?

Start a poll and see if anyone believes you.



Got any threats you want to throw at me? Go ahead, no one takes you seriously.

You keep running from these FACTS.
 
Okay, I haven't deeply read this thread, but it seems LJ or this Honey Badger took a link where a bunch of women joked about some woman cutting off a guy's penis, and he's, if you will, milking it for all it's worth, yammering about feminists and how you feminists hate us males.
So the fact that women laugh at violence against men is no problem for you, but me bringing it up is "yammering".

This is why your movement was losing all its credibility until the Trumpanzee plague came along.

So your argument is that this epidemic of men being grievously injured by their female partners is almost completely unreported because masculinity? Would this be the same hegemonic masculinity you're constantly asserting doesn't actually exist ... or a different masculinity?
LOL NO, it goes unreported because feminist groups like Duluth Model has trivialized domestic violence against men and men and women alike laugh at male victims, which then negatively affects men's views toward masculinity.

"Hegemonic masculinity" is a symptom, not the cause, of the real problem, which is male disposability - something you see in almost all animal species.
Why won't you start a poll, LT?

Afraid of the truth?


Are you claiming that you're still married?

Start a poll and see if anyone believes you.



Got any threats you want to throw at me? Go ahead, no one takes you seriously.

You keep running from these FACTS.
1) Whether anyone believes me is irrelevant. That doesn't in any way impact the fact that I'm still married.
2) Whether anyone takes me seriously is irrelevant.

All you have is your idiotic and wrong-headed opinions. All I have to retaliate with against you is facts.

Feminists define domestic violence as something only men do - ignoring female perpetrators entirely.
 
Whatever.
And I have absolutely no idea why you think Clinton getting elected was 'my cause'.
(a) Not my circus, not my monkeys.
(b) If it were my circus, I would have backed Sanders.

... and also, that's an astoundingly long bow to draw. Do you think anyone other than LJ remembers this incidents - it happened years ago.
And if this had happened to a woman and an audience laughed about it, we would STILL be hearing about it on the news, feminists would still be beating society over the head about it.

That's female privilege for you. Women's transgressions are QUICKLY forgotten by the public, men's are enshrined for all time and become the basis for political causes.
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...avoid-jail-extraordinary-talent-a7739411.html
An Oxford University student who stabbed her boyfriend could be spared a custodial sentence because of her “extraordinary” talent, a court heard.

Aspiring heart surgeon Lavinia Woodward stabbed her Cambridge-educated boyfriend, who she met on the Tinder dating app, in the leg before hurling a laptop, glass and a jam jar at him during a drug-fuelled rage at Christ Church college, Oxford.

The 24-year-old admitted to a charge of unlawful wounding at Oxford Crown Court.
Had this been a man who got away with slashing a woman the feminists would be launching protests around the world.

But it's a woman getting away with slashing her boyfriend, so feminists are utterly silent, and they will never take responsibility for this.

Yet all men are being asked to take responsibility for the acts of abusive men.

And all Richard Daily can do in response to these irrefutable facts is make up LIES about me. He loves seeing men become victims of violence, and will tolerate no one bringing the issue up. But this issue is eternal, it will never die, and feminists must be given no rest and absolutely no peace until they are forced to account for their hypocrisy and negligence.
 
FACT: LT is afraid of women.

FACT: Women want nothing to do with LT

FACT: LT is too scared to face these facts
 
FACT: I am afraid of addressing domestic violence by women
I accept your surrender. You have already admitted you're terrified to discuss the issue of women who commit domestic violence and the issue of society's acceptance of these women's behavior.

You are terrified, Richard Failure. That is why you continue to make up lies about me instead of addressing the issue of female domestic violence.

I know your weaknesses, and they are legion.

But there is only one truly relevant fact here: you enable domestic violence by women, you find it amusing, and you don't like discussions of such things. You prefer to uphold the status quo of feminist hypocrisy.

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10926770903103081
Why the Overwhelming Evidence on Partner Physical Violence by Women Has Not Been Perceived and Is Often Denied

Over 200 studies have found about the same percentage of women as men physically assault partners, and that the risk factors and motivations are mostly the same as for men. Explanations are suggested for why this fundamental fact has not been perceived by the public and practitioners, including concealment and denial by many academics who know the research. Explanations for concealment and denial are also presented, with discussion of the adverse effect that misperception and denial have had on prevention and treatment programs. The practical implications of recognizing gender symmetry in partner violence are discussed.
 
Sometimes men get the same kind of slack as this woman did. From time to time, a man will commit some foul deed but will virtually skate because: "Oh the poor man, actually little more than a child, is sorry for what he did, but would it be fair for him to carry the stigma for the rest of his life? The Stanford swimmer who raped the young woman is a good example of this.

At the same time, a man will carry a higher level of public condemnation than this woman probably will. But they will both avoid the long prison sentences they deserved. :(
 
Last edited:
Sometimes men get the same kind of slack as this woman did. From time to time, a man will commit some foul deed but will be virtually skate because: "Oh the poor man, actually little more than a child, is sorry for what he did, but would it be fair for him to carry the stigma for the rest of his life? The Stanford swimmer who raped the young woman is a good example of this.

At the same time, a man will carry a higher level of public condemnation than this woman probably will. But they will both avoid the long prison sentences they deserved. :(
Yes, the man will be hunted down and hounded, the woman will become a feminist icon.
 
I accept your surrender. You have already admitted you're terrified to discuss the issue of women who commit domestic violence and the issue of society's acceptance of these women's behavior.

You are terrified, Richard Failure. That is why you continue to make up lies about me instead of addressing the issue of female domestic violence.

I know your weaknesses, and they are legion.

But there is only one truly relevant fact here: you enable domestic violence by women, you find it amusing, and you don't like discussions of such things. You prefer to uphold the status quo of feminist hypocrisy.

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10926770903103081


No LT, I am NOT afraid of addressing domestic violence against women. None of what you say is true, and you cannot find any evidence that backs up your asinine claim.

However, you ARE afraid of women, and that is a FACT. There IS ample evidence to back up that FACT: namely, the countless threads you start complaining about women and how your life is unfair.

You are afraid to face the truth of who you are.
 
A big audience of women shamelessly and unquestioningly cheered the unprovoked castration of a man by his wife because he wanted to leave her. And there was no protest march against Sharon Osbourne for running this episode.

This is the real face of feminism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUna51rI_eQ

This is why feminism is a hate movement.
That's what feminism has become to today's society. It's lost it's true meaning.

Feminism is the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes.
It's an organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interest.
 
That's what feminism has become to today's society. It's lost it's true meaning.

Feminism is the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes.
It's an organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interest.

No, it hasn't lost isn't true meaning... here's the meaning:

Feminism is a range of political movements, ideologies, and social movements that share a common goal: to define, establish, and achieve political, economic, personal, and social equality of sexes. This includes seeking to establish educational and professional opportunities for women that are equal to those for men.

If you are against that, you are an idiot.
 
No, it hasn't lost isn't true meaning... here's the meaning:

Quote:

Feminism is a range of political movements, ideologies, and social movements that share a common goal: to define, establish, and achieve political, economic, personal, and social equality of sexes. This includes seeking to establish educational and professional opportunities for women that are equal to those for men.

If you are against that, you are an idiot.

Most people don't oppose that ideal, but so many women want to be more equal. Those who are the subject of this thread are examples. :(
 
Most people don't oppose that ideal, but so many women want to be more equal. Those who are the subject of this thread are examples. :(

yeah, fuck those women who want to be "more equal"!

:rolleyes:

You're a low quality man, right down there with LT.
 
yeah, fuck those women who want to be "more equal"!

:rolleyes:

You're a low quality man, right down there with LT.

Yes, fuck them because "more equal" is supremacy not equality.

I know it's the right kind of demographic for you to support their supremacy....but no amount of that will make supremacy into equality.

Then we're in agreement. Key word being the word equal.

Some pigs being more so than others of course!
 
Back
Top