Midterm Candidates Distancing Selves From United States

AllyRose

What fresh Hell is this?
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Posts
5,144
Midterm Candidates Distancing Selves From United States
NEWS • Politics • Politicians • ISSUE 50•42 • Oct 22, 2014


Incumbents and challengers from both parties are spending millions of dollars on campaign ads that disavow any personal ties to America or its interests.

WASHINGTON—Hoping to avoid any association with a country whose approval rating has hit an all-time low among voters, the entire field of 2014 midterm congressional candidates is actively working to distance themselves from the United States, sources confirmed Wednesday.

In the run up to Election Day, reports indicate that every person campaigning in one of the 36 U.S. Senate or 435 House races is now treating any perceived affiliation with the country as a major political liability—and they’re moving quickly to sever all remaining ties.

“When voters head to the polls on Nov. 4, they should understand that a vote for me is not a vote for the United States,” said Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA), responding to repeated accusations from her opponent that she was once close with the country. “Any allegations or insinuations that I am sympathetic to America are simply false. These are desperate, baseless claims that seek to earn cheap political points with voters by portraying me as an advocate for America, which I am not.”

“Let me state once and for all that I do not endorse this country or share its views,” Landrieu added. “I believe my record has made that clear.”

According to sources, campaign teams from both parties and across all 50 states have worked tirelessly to avoid the stigma that now accompanies involvement of any kind with the country. Political strategists are also reportedly scrambling to assure top donors that if elected, their candidates will not be encumbered by any kind of pro-American baggage.

Top officials have confirmed that both incumbents and challengers are being strongly advised to avoid talking about the United States altogether in interviews and campaign appearances, and to change the subject quickly if pressed on a topic relating to the nation.

“While it’s true I have worked with America in the past, I can assure you that is no longer the case,” Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS) said in a statement addressing video evidence that surfaced last week of a much younger Roberts extolling the country’s virtues. “That was many, many years ago. I had very little information available to me at that point, and I regret speaking before I had all the facts. My views have evolved considerably since that time.”

Added Roberts, “Despite my unfortunate expression of respect for America back then, I can now unequivocally state that I have nothing to do with the country or the values it represents.”

Campaign finance data from the Federal Election Commission reveals that 30 percent of expenditures in this election cycle have gone toward negative advertisements, many of which charge an opponent with having supported the United States, often for their entire career. In a race that is indicative of campaigns nationwide, Republican congressional challenger Will Hurd has reportedly spent millions on ads that attack incumbent Rep. Pete Gallego (D-TX) as “a rubber stamp for America,” accusing him of championing American causes and blasting him and his family for having a long history of ties to the nation.

“Gallego says he’s an independent voice with no connections to the United States, but I’m not sure I trust him,” said Del Rio, TX, registered voter Abigail Tomlinson, explaining that she believes the incumbent is not being entirely forthcoming about his past associations with the country. “Their views line up on a number of key issues, and I don’t think that’s a coincidence.”

“If he’s elected, I just know he’s going to vote for American interests,” Tomlinson continued. “You watch.”

All congressional candidates reached for comment on this article denied any current ties to the United States and hastened to assure reporters their true interests lie elsewhere.


I love The Onion.

:heart:
 
I will see your Onion, and raise you Something Awful:
'The search for ethics in Cat Journalism'
http://www.somethingawful.com/news/gamergate-with-cats/
It wasn't long ago that cat appreciation was reserved solely for True Cat Fans. Yet, in the past few years, Deformed Cat Advocates-or DFAs-have imposed their will on the cat enthusiast community, and their agenda is clear: Only images of cats with adorable birth defects will do. Superimpose "cute" sayings in Impact font if you must, but let's not ignore the able-bodied cats that got us to where we are today. Remember Socks? The mid-to-late nineties almost feel like they were decades ago.
 
CatGateSpot1.jpg
 
I had to change my panties.

:D Yeah. Happens.

That sites been around since the E/N boom, it's a couple years older than Lit, and almost went under with the tech stock crash. They're boards are chaos though. Makes the GB look like heaven by comparison.
 
It has always been about self interests with career politicians on either side.
 
yuuup, republican, democrat, it doesn't matter, they're both big government.
middle class vs. everybody else

BURN IT ALL DOWN!
 
Midterm Candidates Distancing Selves From United States
NEWS • Politics • Politicians • ISSUE 50•42 • Oct 22, 2014


Incumbents and challengers from both parties are spending millions of dollars on campaign ads that disavow any personal ties to America or its interests.

WASHINGTON—Hoping to avoid any association with a country whose approval rating has hit an all-time low among voters, the entire field of 2014 midterm congressional candidates is actively working to distance themselves from the United States, sources confirmed Wednesday.

In the run up to Election Day, reports indicate that every person campaigning in one of the 36 U.S. Senate or 435 House races is now treating any perceived affiliation with the country as a major political liability—and they’re moving quickly to sever all remaining ties.

“When voters head to the polls on Nov. 4, they should understand that a vote for me is not a vote for the United States,” said Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA), responding to repeated accusations from her opponent that she was once close with the country. “Any allegations or insinuations that I am sympathetic to America are simply false. These are desperate, baseless claims that seek to earn cheap political points with voters by portraying me as an advocate for America, which I am not.”

“Let me state once and for all that I do not endorse this country or share its views,” Landrieu added. “I believe my record has made that clear.”

According to sources, campaign teams from both parties and across all 50 states have worked tirelessly to avoid the stigma that now accompanies involvement of any kind with the country. Political strategists are also reportedly scrambling to assure top donors that if elected, their candidates will not be encumbered by any kind of pro-American baggage.

Top officials have confirmed that both incumbents and challengers are being strongly advised to avoid talking about the United States altogether in interviews and campaign appearances, and to change the subject quickly if pressed on a topic relating to the nation.

“While it’s true I have worked with America in the past, I can assure you that is no longer the case,” Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS) said in a statement addressing video evidence that surfaced last week of a much younger Roberts extolling the country’s virtues. “That was many, many years ago. I had very little information available to me at that point, and I regret speaking before I had all the facts. My views have evolved considerably since that time.”

Added Roberts, “Despite my unfortunate expression of respect for America back then, I can now unequivocally state that I have nothing to do with the country or the values it represents.”

Campaign finance data from the Federal Election Commission reveals that 30 percent of expenditures in this election cycle have gone toward negative advertisements, many of which charge an opponent with having supported the United States, often for their entire career. In a race that is indicative of campaigns nationwide, Republican congressional challenger Will Hurd has reportedly spent millions on ads that attack incumbent Rep. Pete Gallego (D-TX) as “a rubber stamp for America,” accusing him of championing American causes and blasting him and his family for having a long history of ties to the nation.

“Gallego says he’s an independent voice with no connections to the United States, but I’m not sure I trust him,” said Del Rio, TX, registered voter Abigail Tomlinson, explaining that she believes the incumbent is not being entirely forthcoming about his past associations with the country. “Their views line up on a number of key issues, and I don’t think that’s a coincidence.”

“If he’s elected, I just know he’s going to vote for American interests,” Tomlinson continued. “You watch.”

All congressional candidates reached for comment on this article denied any current ties to the United States and hastened to assure reporters their true interests lie elsewhere.


I love The Onion.

:heart:

Yes the irony is hilarious. I like to read from all sides but for pure funny The Onion.
 
awww, somethingawful
brings back nightmares of my first veronica moser. :heart:
 
Midterm Candidates Distancing Selves From United States
NEWS • Politics • Politicians • ISSUE 50•42 • Oct 22, 2014


Incumbents and challengers from both parties are spending millions of dollars on campaign ads that disavow any personal ties to America or its interests.

WASHINGTON—Hoping to avoid any association with a country whose approval rating has hit an all-time low among voters, the entire field of 2014 midterm congressional candidates is actively working to distance themselves from the United States, sources confirmed Wednesday.

In the run up to Election Day, reports indicate that every person campaigning in one of the 36 U.S. Senate or 435 House races is now treating any perceived affiliation with the country as a major political liability—and they’re moving quickly to sever all remaining ties.

“When voters head to the polls on Nov. 4, they should understand that a vote for me is not a vote for the United States,” said Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA), responding to repeated accusations from her opponent that she was once close with the country. “Any allegations or insinuations that I am sympathetic to America are simply false. These are desperate, baseless claims that seek to earn cheap political points with voters by portraying me as an advocate for America, which I am not.”

“Let me state once and for all that I do not endorse this country or share its views,” Landrieu added. “I believe my record has made that clear.”

According to sources, campaign teams from both parties and across all 50 states have worked tirelessly to avoid the stigma that now accompanies involvement of any kind with the country. Political strategists are also reportedly scrambling to assure top donors that if elected, their candidates will not be encumbered by any kind of pro-American baggage.

Top officials have confirmed that both incumbents and challengers are being strongly advised to avoid talking about the United States altogether in interviews and campaign appearances, and to change the subject quickly if pressed on a topic relating to the nation.

“While it’s true I have worked with America in the past, I can assure you that is no longer the case,” Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS) said in a statement addressing video evidence that surfaced last week of a much younger Roberts extolling the country’s virtues. “That was many, many years ago. I had very little information available to me at that point, and I regret speaking before I had all the facts. My views have evolved considerably since that time.”

Added Roberts, “Despite my unfortunate expression of respect for America back then, I can now unequivocally state that I have nothing to do with the country or the values it represents.”

Campaign finance data from the Federal Election Commission reveals that 30 percent of expenditures in this election cycle have gone toward negative advertisements, many of which charge an opponent with having supported the United States, often for their entire career. In a race that is indicative of campaigns nationwide, Republican congressional challenger Will Hurd has reportedly spent millions on ads that attack incumbent Rep. Pete Gallego (D-TX) as “a rubber stamp for America,” accusing him of championing American causes and blasting him and his family for having a long history of ties to the nation.

“Gallego says he’s an independent voice with no connections to the United States, but I’m not sure I trust him,” said Del Rio, TX, registered voter Abigail Tomlinson, explaining that she believes the incumbent is not being entirely forthcoming about his past associations with the country. “Their views line up on a number of key issues, and I don’t think that’s a coincidence.”

“If he’s elected, I just know he’s going to vote for American interests,” Tomlinson continued. “You watch.”

All congressional candidates reached for comment on this article denied any current ties to the United States and hastened to assure reporters their true interests lie elsewhere.


I love The Onion.

:heart:

I love that a large chunk of our generation has come to assume that all news is first a satire. It's on the one hand sort of sad, but on the other hand, at least we're evaluating things more critically than our predecessors.
 
I love that a large chunk of our generation has come to assume that all news is first a satire. It's on the one hand sort of sad, but on the other hand, at least we're evaluating things more critically than our predecessors.

Very well put - I agree, both with the faint sadness and the critical mindset, if the latter is true. The problem is that the real world is becoming so ludicrous that it is ever harder to satirize. In Britain we had the wonderful Chris Morris and Armando Iannucci in The Day Today, but their bombastic over the top presentation style is now virtually indistinguishable from the real thing.
 
I love that a large chunk of our generation has come to assume that all news is first a satire. It's on the one hand sort of sad, but on the other hand, at least we're evaluating things more critically than our predecessors.

ROFL. Who's 'we'? Like any American today thinks like John Jay or doesn't believe Nixon was a bad guy.

The trick that has been prevailed is to make the cynicism of the news dumber so as to discourage actual research.

Remember 'That's My Bush'? It was put there to validate off the wall comments.

'It's Bush's fault'
'Who's Bush?'
'That guy who hits his wife, don't you watch CC?'
'Yep, Jon Stewart is the best News Reporter.'

Intelligent cynicism is rare these days.
 
ROFL. Who's 'we'? Like any American today thinks like John Jay or doesn't believe Nixon was a bad guy.

The trick that has been prevailed is to make the cynicism of the news dumber so as to discourage actual research.

Remember 'That's My Bush'? It was put there to validate off the wall comments.

'It's Bush's fault'
'Who's Bush?'
'That guy who hits his wife, don't you watch CC?'
'Yep, Jon Stewart is the best News Reporter.'

Intelligent cynicism is rare these days.

And of course, that benchmark of intelligence is to be arbited by… you, I presume? By 'we," I of course mean those of us born after 1980 - Gen Y, or Millennials as you insist. It is we who have witnessed the stupid greed of the Reagan Era, the cheap titillated outrage of the Clinton years, the trumped-up patriotism of 9/11 and the Boomers' fade from relevance post-crash. The fact that you're still talking about Nixon tells me you fundamentally don't understand the problem. Best move along - this isn't a discussion where you're prepared to keep up.
 
Back
Top