Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That may be true, but anyone looking for such stories in a bisexual category is likely to (1) check the tag to see if it's the type of story they're after (i.e.: "I'm a bi-woman and I want a tender romance of such a woman discovering her bi side...") and/or (2) will probably not take it out on the writer if said writer give them a scene with an extra penis because they're reading the story for thematic content, not for stroke.I think Stella is not entirely correct when she says the action is what matters. In a pure stroke story, that may be the case. But, in a more emotional, dramatic story, the themes of reluctance, curiosity, discovery, etc., are very different. In other words, the "theme" is essential; and the theme of a FFM story and a MMF story are very different.
Aren't you the guy who just said, in another thread that you hate it when extra dicks pop up in a story?BTTap said:I think Stella is not entirely correct when she says the action is what matters. In a pure stroke story, that may be the case. But, in a more emotional, dramatic story, the themes of reluctance, curiosity, discovery, etc., are very different. In other words, the "theme" is essential; and the theme of a FFM story and a MMF story are very different.
That may be true, but anyone looking for such stories in a bisexual category is likely to (1) check the tag to see if it's the type of story they're after (i.e.: "I'm a bi-woman and I want a tender romance of such a woman discovering her bi side...") and/or (2) will probably not take it out on the writer if said writer give them a scene with an extra penis because they're reading the story for thematic content, not for stroke.
This as compared to those looking for pure stroke and, thus, likely to rudely (and undeservedly) slap down a good story for ruining their stroke with that extra penis.
If one is judging a story by way of theme, by way of a character's reluctance, curiosity, discovery, then one is going to judge the story on that, not on the gender combination in the sex scene. Yes?
Aren't you the guy who just said, in another thread that you hate it when extra dicks pop up in a story?
In which case, the theme wouldn't matter a hill of beans to you. Right?
I guess that would be up to the writer? And let the readers develop the expectations for the cat, -- as, ghawdnose, they have done in LW.I painted myself into a corner, I guess. For the record, whatever type of story we're dealing with, I typically don't want to be metaphorically slapped in the face with a random hard-on (or literally, for that matter).
My point was that story that is ABOUT (caps for emphasis!) a girl discovering her bi-side (for example), may only have FF sex in it, but that doesn't mean it need (or should) be in Lesb. If the theme is her emerging BI-sexuality (as opposed to emerging/heretofore closeted lesbianism), then it seems to me it should be in the prospective Bi-Sex (or Bi-Sex F) category.
Stella-I would really appreciate it if you would quit nit-picking my nit-picking.
I like the idea of a bisexual category, but only one. I believe there aren't enough stories with male bisexuals to make a separate category worthwhile. I also want to point out that not all group sex stories involve bisexuals.
Which I'm sure you could easily find both in Lesbian (no guy involved) or group, guy involved. In fact, I'm sure there are dozens such stories in those categories right now that you can indulge in and satisfy both forebrain and hind. Hence, you don't need yet ANOTHER category for that which turns you on, thematically or stroke, in Bisexual. Two categories already exist here on Lit to satisfy your yearnings for women lusting after pussy or cock--no men lusting for cock invited. But if you DID feel that such would only turn up in bisexual, are you saying that you wouldn't glance at all at the tag to make sure you were getting your FF or MFF rather than MMF?However, a heretofore hetero gal feeling the pull of puss, or a lesbi-leaning gal gravitating to cock, is more interesting to me, plus a lot more sexy.
That's because the bi guys who write make their stories fully gay and have the girl as a voyeur to not offend anyone. I've changed a few stories to fit that censorship for that reason. However, I'd love to include MMF in a bi story the way I originally intended. There are lots of male bisexual writers who do the same. Also, there are quite a lot of bisexual male readers who would rather read MMF stories then just the gay category.
So ya, I vote a bisexual category, but I'd like there to be some kind of identifier for MMF or FFM stories, not necessarily 2 new story categories.
Which I'm sure you could easily find both in Lesbian (no guy involved) or group, guy involved. In fact, I'm sure there are dozens such stories in those categories right now that you can indulge in and satisfy both forebrain and hind. Hence, you don't need yet ANOTHER category for that which turns you on, thematically or stroke, in Bisexual. Two categories already exist here on Lit to satisfy your yearnings for women lusting after pussy or cock--no men lusting for cock invited. But if you DID feel that such would only turn up in bisexual, are you saying that you wouldn't glance at all at the tag to make sure you were getting your FF or MFF rather than MMF?
Any way you slice it, stroke or theme, your argument for two categories is unconvincing.
*is diverted*FF stories are very different from MM stories
*is diverted*
What makes them so different?
Oh, I don't think we've done much tiptoeing.
Most of the readers here don't mind reading about two women getting it on in Group Sex category-- it's reading about two men that drives the homophobic readers apeshit.
Many writers have stories they won't post here because of that horrible reaction.
Well, I know for a fact that there are at least two women on the site who are as violently homophobic as any man-- so I said "readers"
yes, I will not post stories about bisexual women in Lesbian. But my women are so damn queer, they don't appeal to the general run of readers here.Point taken.
And then there's heterophobic... readers.
Sounds like biphobics of any gender might be as happy with the new category as bi writers.
yes, I will not post stories about bisexual women in Lesbian. But my women are so damn queer, they don't appeal to the general run of readers here.
It's all going to forbidden fiction, I do believe.
let's get one thing done at a time.Seriously, this is why we need a specific category for genderqueers and others. Something like an "uhh..." category, or maybe just "???"