MissLabelled
Majestically Queer
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2024
- Posts
- 2,103
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ivan Reitman can do no wrongNope - 1984.
You're amazing and so very hot...
You’re so sweetYou're amazing and so very hot...
Just as we appreciate all of yours alsoAnd we appreciate them immensely.
Okay… a couple nights ago, I was watching “In Search Of…” which was Leonard Nimoy’s series in the late 70’s. The episode was about Van Gogh and presented a theory that he didn’t cut his ear off, but his friend Gogan (sp?) did in a fencing match. But Van Gogh didn’t admit it because he didn’t want his friend to get in trouble.Am I going to hell? Maybe. But, this was the best $4 I ever spent.
View attachment 2340520
OMG!!!! That is tooo funny!!!!
I didn't know it was through fencing, but yes I did know it was Gauguin.Okay… a couple nights ago, I was watching “In Search Of…” which was Leonard Nimoy’s series in the late 70’s. The episode was about Van Gogh and presented a theory that he didn’t cut his ear off, but his friend Gogan (sp?) did in a fencing match. But Van Gogh didn’t admit it because he didn’t wsnt his friend to get in trouble.
And then you post this… Coincidence???
No idea… I’m horny and don’t really care either way…
Really! Wow. I had even watched that episode before, but didn't remember that part of it - and I thought it made perfect sense. They said Van Gogh was an excellent swordsman... so a duel (maybe a drunken duel) made sense to me.I didn't know it was through fencing, but yes I did know it was Gauguin.
Favorite Paul Gauguin painting.
She is lovely. Ophelia? Be sure not to over water her...
Thank gods for google. I wanted to spell it like you did. Here is an article about the possible ear fiasco.Really! Wow. I had even watched that episode before, but didn't remember that part of it - and I thought it made perfect sense. They said Van Gogh was an excellent swordsman... so a duel (maybe a drunken duel) made sense to me.
Especially the drunk part. Because... that sounds fun...
And so cool you can spell that!!!
I think Ghostbusters II sort of refutes that statement, creepy Peter MacNicol notwithstanding.Ivan Reitman can do no wrong
She is gorgeous!!
What she said.You did.
How cool!!! I loved that show as a kid when it was new, and still enjoy it all these years later - even though some of those mysteries have much more info now. I love that you found an article stating the same theory I was half sleeping through the other night.Thank gods for google. I wanted to spell it like you did. Here is an article about the possible ear fiasco.
I enjoyed the second one. Nostalgia might be clouding my judgement...I think Ghostbusters II sort of refutes that statement, creepy Peter MacNicol notwithstanding.
That second movie was pretty fun.... I'm going to watch it next, when the first one I'm watching now finishes.I think Ghostbusters II sort of refutes that statement, creepy Peter MacNicol notwithstanding.
I see what you did thereShe is lovely. Ophelia? Be sure not to over water her...
What did you do, Ray...?That second movie was pretty fun.... I'm going to watch it next, when the first one I'm watching now finishes.
And Peter MacNicol? F-ing amazing!!! I've seen him in serious roles, and was excellent... but him doing Dwight Fry??? Amazing balls!