I think the problem here is that Coach and the others proposing this idea that rights exist independent of humans and human beliefs and ideas as opposed to a technological invention have been fed a specific worldview, religious or otherwise, which strongly appeals to that innate human desire for stability and a degree of predictability; Humans are special and there are inherent truths and mechanisms in this universe which govern human behaviour in a positive way.
So when we propose this almost nihilistic idea that those inherent mechanisms and rules that make up this imaginary moral safety net don't exist, everything is subjective, no action or event means anything or has any intrinsic moral value, and our governing rules are just the contemporary interpretation of the compromise between individual and social freedoms that every half-functioning society has to make...that's probably pretty scary to somebody who's believed in this idea of spoon-fed unalienable moral frameworks for their whole life.
E.g. "If I killed CoachDB tomorrow that would be objectively a bad thing and my moral standing according to the universe gets reduced" - It's more personally appealing to know that even if I die my murderer is condemned and punished by the universe itself so I will definitely get my own back. As a human I'm special and this giant authoritarian strongman (the universe/god/whatever) is keeping me safe. Than: - "If I killed CoachDB tomorrow that has no effect on the amoral inanimate object that is the universe whatsoever aside from making his family sad".
So when we propose this almost nihilistic idea that those inherent mechanisms and rules that make up this imaginary moral safety net don't exist, everything is subjective, no action or event means anything or has any intrinsic moral value, and our governing rules are just the contemporary interpretation of the compromise between individual and social freedoms that every half-functioning society has to make...that's probably pretty scary to somebody who's believed in this idea of spoon-fed unalienable moral frameworks for their whole life.
E.g. "If I killed CoachDB tomorrow that would be objectively a bad thing and my moral standing according to the universe gets reduced" - It's more personally appealing to know that even if I die my murderer is condemned and punished by the universe itself so I will definitely get my own back. As a human I'm special and this giant authoritarian strongman (the universe/god/whatever) is keeping me safe. Than: - "If I killed CoachDB tomorrow that has no effect on the amoral inanimate object that is the universe whatsoever aside from making his family sad".
Last edited: