Obama Rewards Brutal Cuban Dictators

From The Nation (let's see if vette can respond to this without using the word "propaganda" or any synonym! :D):

Why the US-Cuba Deal Really Is a Victory for the Cuban Revolution

The left should recall and applaud the long resistance of tiny Cuba to the northern Goliath.

Tom Hayden December 17, 2014


No one in the mainstream media will acknowledge it, but the normalization of American relations with Havana, symbolized by release of prisoners today, is a huge success for the Cuban Revolution.

The hostile US policy, euphemistically known as “regime change,” has been thwarted. The Cuban Communist Party is confidently in power. The Castros have navigated through all the challenges of the years. In Latin America and the United Nations, Cuba is accepted, and the United States is isolated.

It is quite legitimate for American progressives to criticize various flaws and failures of the Cuban Revolution. But the media and the right are overflowing with such commentary. Only the left can recall, narrate and applaud the long resistance of tiny Cuba to the northern Goliath.

For those actually supportive of participatory democracy in Cuba, as opposed to those who support regime change by secret programs, the way to greater openness on the island lies in a relaxation of the external threat.

Despite the US embargo and relentless US subversion, Cuba remains in the upper tier of the United Nations Human Development Index because of its educational and healthcare achievements. Cuba even leads the international community in the dispatch of medical workers to fight Ebola. Cuba is celebrated globally because of its military contribution to the defeat of colonialism and apartheid in Angola and southern Africa. Now a new generation of Cuban leaders who fought in Angola is coming to power in the Havana and its diplomatic corps. For example, Rodolfo Reyes Rodríguez, Cuba’s representative to the United Nations, today walks on an artificial limb as a result of his combat in Angola.

When few thought it possible, Cuba has achieved the return of all five prisoners held for spying on right-wing Cubans who trained at Florida bases and flew harassment missions through Cuban air space. The last three to be released served hard time in American prisons, and are being welcomed as triumphant heroes on the streets of Havana. Three of the Cuban Five served in Angola as well.

Tens of thousands of Americans, from the veterans of the cane-cutting Venceremos Brigades to the steady flow of tourists insisting on their right to travel, deserve credit for steady years of educational and solidarity work and for pushing a hardy congressional bloc towards normalization.

President Obama has kept his word, despite relentless skepticism from both the left and the mainstream media. He is confounding the mainstream assumption that the Cuban right has a permanent lock on American foreign policy, especially after the Republican sweep in the November elections.

In this case, Obama’s extreme emphasis on diplomatic secrecy worked to his advantage. For over a year, leaders in both countries have conducted regular private debates and consultations, which resulted in the detailed normalization plan released in both capitals today. No one was more important on the American congressional team than Senator Patrick Leahy. Their tight discipline held until the final moment.

It is known that the private US-Cuba conversations about Alan Gross and the Cuban Five were the most difficult. The United States has never acknowledged that Gross was a de facto spy of a certain type, having traveled five times to Havana to secretly distribute advanced communications technology to persons in Havana’s small Jewish community before he was arrested in 2009. Also problematic for American officials immersed in decades of Cold War thinking was the task of wrapping their minds around the idea that the Cuban Five were political prisoners and not terrorist threats.

Finally, when both sides had achieved an internal consensus, the project was derailed by the furious Republican-led blowback against Obama’s trade of five Taliban captives for captured American soldier Bowe Bergdahl in May 2014. Then the November elections interfered with, and threatened to indefinitely delay, the beginning of normalization. Chanukah was the last date for an announcement before the installation of the new US Congress.

Because of the anti-Cuban slant of mainstream thinking, the media will make much of the anger of the Cuban right exemplified by Senator Marco Rubio. But while it’s too early to know, it’s hard to imagine his presidential ambitions being enhanced by arguing in 2016 that Obama should have tried to overthrow the Castros. Senator Bob Menendez has been a leading Democrat trying to block the Obama initiative from his chairing position on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Most Democrats will be delighted to see Menendez, who represents Cuban exiles in Union City, diminished in the Senate.

Going forward, the United States will remove Cuba from the “state terrorism” listing, which will ease the possibility of funding from the international financial system. For American citizens, permission to travel to Cuba will be significantly widened. Business and trade possibilities will increase. Starting with the 2015 Summit of the Americas in Panama, the American and Cuban delegations will sit at the same table. The so-called interest sections will be upgraded to formal embassies. The embargo is going to be hollowed out from within, with American tourist and investment dollars permitted to flow. With or without congressional action to lift the 1996 Helms-Burton act, the embargo is being dissolved. More than 400,000 Cuban-Americans traveled to Cuba last year alone.

And here’s a prediction: if the president has his wish, the Obama family will be seen on the streets of Havana before his term is up.

Editor’s Note: “Two Old Guys Talking” is the introduction to Tom Hayden’s forthcoming book, Listen, Yankee!, Why Cuba Matters, to be published next year by Seven Stories Press. The piece was finalized last month. The “two old guys” are the author, now 75, who first visited Cuba in 1968, and Ricardo Alarcon, now 77, former president of the Cuban National Assembly, foreign minister, and UN representative.
 
The left are not socialists, but they should applaud Communists?

How is Obama giving a victory (and it is a victory) to Communist Cuba, either surprising, or cause for celebration?
 
The left are not socialists . . .

Some very few are Communists; some few are democratic socialists as distinct from Communists; most are progressives/social democrats as distinct from socialists; some are just liberals -- though I don't really count those as "left," but you would.

. . . but they should applaud Communists?

Or at least acknowledge and learn from their accomplishments, when they have such.

It is quite legitimate for American progressives to criticize various flaws and failures of the Cuban Revolution. But the media and the right are overflowing with such commentary. Only the left can recall, narrate and applaud the long resistance of tiny Cuba to the northern Goliath.

Why do you think Fidel has been so popular in Cuba for so long? Partly because of silencing dissent, but mainly because he is the only leader in Cuban history to stand up to the U.S. and make it stick. That matters to the Cubans. Also:

Despite the US embargo and relentless US subversion, Cuba remains in the upper tier of the United Nations Human Development Index because of its educational and healthcare achievements. Cuba even leads the international community in the dispatch of medical workers to fight Ebola. Cuba is celebrated globally because of its military contribution to the defeat of colonialism and apartheid in Angola and southern Africa. Now a new generation of Cuban leaders who fought in Angola is coming to power in the Havana and its diplomatic corps. For example, Rodolfo Reyes Rodríguez, Cuba’s representative to the United Nations, today walks on an artificial limb as a result of his combat in Angola.

How is Obama giving a victory (and it is a victory) to Communist Cuba, either surprising, or cause for celebration?

It is surprising because it seemed impossible, up to now, that things would ever change between the U.S. and Cuba until Fidel and Raul passed away. It is cause for celebration because it will be good for both countries' economies, because there will now be more travel and cultural contact between the two, and:

For those actually supportive of participatory democracy in Cuba, as opposed to those who support regime change by secret programs, the way to greater openness on the island lies in a relaxation of the external threat.

IOW, openness with the U.S. might eventually lead to real democracy in Cuba -- democratic capitalism or democratic socialism or some mix -- which path Cuba ultimately follows is less important than that the people get a real chance to choose.
 
Last edited:
I read where Roberta Jacobson Assistant Secretary of State will lead a delegation to Havana to meet the Castros and discuss future relationships. Here's what she wrote in 1986:

That's an analysis of liberation theology; not one word can be read as an endorsement.
 
That's an analysis of liberation theology; not one word can be read as an endorsement.

Looks like our Vettebigot is trying to adopt query's little trick of redefining words to suit his political bias, with similar results.
 
Lifting the embargo may help the Cuban people, then again it's possible it won't, but the embargo sure isn't helping them.

The Castro regime is evil and oppressive, but the embargo isn't hurting them, just the Cuban people.

It was the right decision and past time for it.
 
Bullshit. The embargo has hurt Cuba, it's why they still live in the 50s. There sole source of real income comes from Russia and Venezuela, both of which are tanking economically...enter stage left Barack Obama, bent on helping the Castro regime to survive. We got nothing out of the deal, nothing except an aid worker, they got three convicted dangerous spies. We got no concessions from the regime, nothing that will benefit the Cuban people.

You don't seem capable of taking a long view and you lack imagination. Sort of like Fox News actually.
 
I lived through the cold war from beginning to end.

We know, Methuselah.

We know this because you're still living it.

Join the future before the last bus leaves you at the stop. It ain't stopping or coming back for you.
 
So some people think that the change is a reward to the Castros, without thinking of the capitalism opportunities that will come: Tourism, cigars, casinos...OMFG GOP, think!!!
 
My view is longer than yours. I remember when Castro nationalized American property and business in Cuba. I remember when he allowed the Russians to put nuclear weapons on his soil aimed at us. I remember when Castro and Khrushchev brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. I know what real communism is. I lived through the cold war from beginning to end. I saw it in action in Vietnam. I remember how we propped up the Soviet Union when it couldn't feed it's people. I remember as well, what it got us, nothing.

You're wed to the past. The Castros will soon be dead just like you. We can have a future with 11 million Cuban people, friends in our hemisphere 100 miles from our shores. Just because you remember shit from sixty years ago does not mean we need to keep reliving it. Go ahead, nominate Rubio.
 
Bullshit. The embargo has hurt Cuba, it's why they still live in the 50s. There sole source of real income comes from Russia and Venezuela, both of which are tanking economically...enter stage left Barack Obama, bent on helping the Castro regime to survive. We got nothing out of the deal, nothing except an aid worker, they got three convicted dangerous spies. We got no concessions from the regime, nothing that will benefit the Cuban people.

I have no disagreement that it's hurt Cuba. The Cuban people are suffering. But the asshole Castro brothers could give a shit about their people. They aren't hurting, they're cemented in power.

The Castro regime has survived for 50 years maybe when Fidel and Raul are both dead it will all change but the people shouldn't be made to suffer any more if the embargo isn't doing anything to budge the Castros.

That's why it's necessary and time to end the embargo. The fact that the Castros may get good press out of too is just the bitter part of the pill that has to be taken with the sweet. What we get out of it is the release of an American, maybe a Cuban population that will be better off as opposed to them definitely not being, and knowing having done the right thing.

And this is definitely a political move and stunt, it just also is still the right thing to do.
 
Lifting the embargo may help the Cuban people, then again it's possible it won't, but the embargo sure isn't helping them.

The Castro regime is evil and oppressive, but the embargo isn't hurting them, just the Cuban people.

It was the right decision and past time for it.

Well, not "was." Obama has decided to normalize diplomatic relations and expand permitted trade and travel, but under the Helms-Burton Act he can't entirely lift the embargo without Congressional approval.
 
It is not the job of the American taxpayer to make life better for communists in Cuba, or any of it's other people who have chosen not to overthrow that regime in 60 years.

Waitaminnit, I thought you wanted the Castro regime gone for the sake of the Cuban people. Are they of any less value because they acquiesce in Communism? And, if we owe nothing to the government or the people, why not just treat Cuba like any other country?
 
We got nothing out of the deal, nothing except an aid worker, they got three convicted dangerous spies.

Tom Hayden:

When few thought it possible, Cuba has achieved the return of all five prisoners held for spying on right-wing Cubans who trained at Florida bases and flew harassment missions through Cuban air space. The last three to be released served hard time in American prisons, and are being welcomed as triumphant heroes on the streets of Havana. Three of the Cuban Five served in Angola as well.

<snip>

It is known that the private US-Cuba conversations about Alan Gross and the Cuban Five were the most difficult. The United States has never acknowledged that Gross was a de facto spy of a certain type, having traveled five times to Havana to secretly distribute advanced communications technology to persons in Havana’s small Jewish community before he was arrested in 2009. Also problematic for American officials immersed in decades of Cold War thinking was the task of wrapping their minds around the idea that the Cuban Five were political prisoners and not terrorist threats.

We got no concessions from the regime, nothing that will benefit the Cuban people.

But ending the embargo would benefit them, and this is at least a step in that direction.
 
Go ahead and think for a minute that communism in Cuba will die with the Castros.

Something will. Today's China is not Mao's China, today's Vietnam is not Ho's Vietnam, things are no more democratic but they are somewhat looser and more capitalistic.
 
Back
Top