Zoophilia, is it really a bdsm topic?

WriterDom

Good to the last drop
Joined
Jun 25, 2000
Posts
20,077
Just wondered. I saw it listed on the up and coming catalog. Sure, it's about as kinky as you get, but a bdsm topic?
 
WriterDom said:
Just wondered. I saw it listed on the up and coming catalog. Sure, it's about as kinky as you get, but a bdsm topic?

Well, people do whip horses to make them go faster.

I guess it depends on whether or not the horse likes it. :D

Personally, I say it's not any part of BDSM.
 
No, it's probably not a BDSM topic per se. I figured I'd include it, though, as a description of some of the threads that always exist here -- not as a suggestion for threads that are yet to come. Where else would we put the Snuff Play thread that's all about dolphin sex?
 
Maybe,...

...though I am not sure of my exact definition, Beastiality would suffer to be placed in BDSM as a sub-category under Sadism and/or Masochism. Two consensual parties to the "play", or "scene".

(just a thought)
 
Hmmm... well, if I don't list it as its own category, should zoophilia go under 'fetish?'
 
Well I admit, I am not clear on what this is. I have no opinion on where it belongs since I have no information to judge from.

Rose:heart:
 
Zoophilia is to bestiality as making love is to fucking.

I say stick it in fetish.
 
Quint

Quint said:
Zoophilia is to bestiality as making love is to fucking.

I say stick it in fetish.

Same action,...but different mind set? What if a man wanted his wife/gf/sex partner, (who also loved and cared for the dog deeply), to watch his dog,(which he loved and cared for deeply), fuck him in the ass. Is that Zoophilia or beastiality?
Is that a 'FETISH'?

(just curious):rose:
 
Re: Quint

artful said:


Same action,...but different mind set? What if a man wanted his wife/gf/sex partner, (who also loved and cared for the dog deeply), to watch his dog,(which he loved and cared for deeply), fuck him in the ass. Is that Zoophilia or beastiality?
Is that a 'FETISH'?

(just curious):rose:

It's all semantics in my opinion anyway. Zoophiles tend to regard their animal with a great deal of affection, and believe that somehow makes it better when they play around with them. They regard bestiality with disgust, for the most part; perhaps it's less consensual; perhaps it's just less "special." I usually laugh at this point. It's not legal. You can't make a foolproof argument that it's consensual. Therefore, the only reason to differentiate between the terms is to give yourself mental reassurance that you really aren't a bad person because you LOVE your pet. Doesn't change the actions at all.

So to answer your question, they probably consider it zoophilia. I'd call it bestiality as a general rule, because the "intentions" of either party to make smoochies with their puppy don't really matter much to me. I would also definitely call that a fetish. Lit would put it in Extreme/Non-Human, but I'm not Lit.
 
Re: Re: Quint

Quint said:


It's all semantics in my opinion anyway.

Quint,...I agree,...it's mostly semantics,...I was just curious as to how Nemo would categorize it. Thanks for the reply though. :rose:
 
sorry but the whole concept..

of anybody doing anything with animals except loving and caring for them is just disgusting to me and I hope to hell it ISNT considered BDSM at all
 
Back
Top