You Salon.com readers

[SINthysist]

What do you think of the pose of a nude young girl, and I mean young, with her hands crossed behind her in the slave submission position.

I mean, are they that desparate for hits on the website?


http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2002/01/18/sturges/index_np.html

 

[Guest]

I agree with myself. Salon.com should be politically correct and only show art that has USA flags in it. No art should have controversy and any USA artist who does not show flags should be arrested. I don't care if the artist is in major world museums because I decided he is not art and I am genius. Only politically correct patriot art should be allowed now in America.

 

[WriterDom]

Nice pic. Don't quite get the troll response, but if he had a pair he wouldn't be a troll.

 

[talk2024]

Well, there is an article accompanying the photo... it's not just a stand alone gratuitous cover shot... so...

 

[SINthysist]

Probably one of the Madonna-Dung types.

Would he approve of Hillary in the same pose?

On Normandy beach with the rocks placed in the form of a cross?

Or was it one of our favorite board members defending his story by defending the pic?

 

[SINthysist]

I walked out on stage where a hundred pimply kids were waiting to audition. They looked so small. Tiny, even. I wondered if I should have worn a tie or something, 'cause suddenly I felt way old.

I checked her card, expecting her to be a freshman, probably fifteen years old… She seemed too tiny. But then, they all did.

She was way too young to contemplate anything other than a good late-night jerk-off fantasy. Problem was I knew that I'd never be able to lay back in my bed later that night and conjure up her pretty, young body in my mind, without having first had some actual emotional contact with her.

But this girl was a high school student, and I knew there was no way I could come up with a plausible storyline that ends up with us in bed. But I wanted very much to have that jerk-off session, so I had to try something a little dangerous. I would have to touch her. And not just a brush or two. I would have to touch her for an extended time, feel her skin, maybe even smell her, so I could bring up the sensations later and become aroused. What I came up with was somewhat innocent, a little dirty, and definitely perverted. And I had to be real careful.

I was feeling very perverted, letting my eyes dance all over her.

As the music began I unbuttoned my jeans. No one could see me in the back, it was too dark, and I was behind a table, and I very much needed to readjust Mr. Happy, who had grown considerably since I made contact with Patti. I swear that's all I was planning to do, but the moment I touched the old P-man, he jumped up and grew another inch. Oh yes, I was aroused, and I knew I had to do a little stroking. So I looked around. No one was near. It was dark. I was feeling seriously anxious. So I did it. I pulled my cock out. Jesus, I was so scared someone would come running back to ask me a question and catch me! But no one did. So I kept on stroking. Hidden behind the table I was able to stroke myself off while watching Patti dance.

I squeezed my cock hard and let out a little sigh, which no one could hear thanks to Mr. McCoy's loud piano. I placed a T-shirt from my rehearsal bag over my stomach and jerked off harder. I saw myself peeling her tights off, turning her around and entering her tiny pussy from behind, fucking her right there on the stage, spreading those little sweaty little legs, pushing my cock into her and listening to her moan with her first orgasm, and her gabbing my ass and pulling me deeper into her cunt. I put my finger up to my nose, smelled her sweat again, and came all over the T-shirt.

 

[modest mouse]

SIN,

I think there might be an interesting discussion here...but you're so hung up on posting that same damn passage from a member's story that I shrug my shoulders and move on.

 

[SINthysist]

Politics ain't beanbag...

 

[Angel]

I think he's obsessed.

 

[modest mouse]

Right, I was under the impression this was a discussion of morality as it relates to sexuality and ptential exploitation. I missed the political discussion in the thread, my apologies.

Thanks for assuming you know anything about me though, it saves me a significant amount of time.

Nice to know you cannot handle more than one flavor or topic at once on the board, making note of that.

 

[zantac666]

I've seen some of sturges work and it has no sex in it the pics. are to show the innocents of young children some people look at it as filth because you will have pedophiles looking at it would you rather thet look at books or your daughter niether realy but there out there. But sturges work is great. I cannot see a 6 year old haveing sex thats sick on the adult's side and should be horse wipped.

 

[SINthysist]

MM

As a parent, and here's where you are behind the 8-ball, because I have been talking about this for a while now, before you were here, I object to teachers taking advantage of students.

I object to adults imposing themselves on budding sexuality.

The law says, I cannot write a story involving 17 year-olds and publish it. This story begins byt saying that the protagonist cared not for the age of his mark, just his urges.

That is not very noble, human, or ...

As for these comments:

"Thanks for assuming you know anything about me though, it saves me a significant amount of time.

Nice to know you cannot handle more than one flavor or topic at once on the board, making note of that."

They come out of the blue when you look at this one thread in totality.

 

[SINthysist]

"I've seen some of sturges work and it has no sex in it the pics. are to show the innocents of young children some people look at it as filth because you will have pedophiles looking at it would you rather thet look at books or your daughter niether realy but there out there. But sturges work is great. I cannot see a 6 year old haveing sex thats sick on the adult's side and should be horse wipped."


Take these pictures to the One-Day Photomat and see how long befor you get a knock on your door...

 

[modest mouse]

Re: MM

They come out of the blue when you look at this one thread in totality.

First thing...you would be better served to leave the quote bars in, so as to make your post clear.

I dont think my comments are ata ll out of the blue but I also cannot explain if you dont see it already.

If you have an issue with 'underage' sexual media...you kill any discussion of it at soon as you cast yourself as some zealot with the same act. Thats the truth, a new tact might prove more successful in discussion.

 

[zantac666]

"I've seen some of sturges work and it has no sex in it the pics. are to show the innocents of young children some people look at it as filth because you will have pedophiles looking at it would you rather thet look at books or your daughter niether realy but there out there. But sturges work is great. I cannot see a 6 year old haveing sex thats sick on the adult's side and should be horse wipped."


Take these pictures to the One-Day Photomat and see how long befor you get a knock on your door...

It has append and the courts found that the police and the person how reported it were at fault my mother took a lot of pics. of my niece in the nude we never had a knock it is how it is done not because they are nude if there is an adult in with them the you might second guess it but when you have a 2 year old pose funny when she see's a camara the it is innocent.