Selena_Kitt
Disappearing
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2004
- Posts
- 12,336
You Might Be Misrepresenting God If...
- Thread starter Selena_Kitt
- Start date
English Lady
Erotic English Rose
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Posts
- 48,011
Loved it and agreed whole-heartedly, this is the one that really struck me:
If you think that religion and Christianity are compatible, you might be misrepresenting God.
If you think that religion and Christianity are compatible, you might be misrepresenting God.
it's a little wordy, but its essence is correct, IMO. thanks!
I think I agree...
One might sum them each up with: You might be misrepresenting God of you swallow...
.... doctrine
What did you expect! It's a porn site... sometimes.
Jenny_Jackson
Psycho Bitch
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2006
- Posts
- 10,872
Damn, SK. I have missed you.
G
Guest
Guest
Selena_Kitt
Disappearing
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2004
- Posts
- 12,336
Pure
Fiel a Verdad
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2001
- Posts
- 15,135
it occurred to me that a companion thread, "you might be misrepresenting the universe and what we know about it, through scientific study, if you..." might be appropriate.
as neon indicated, the line is "God is unknowable and not to be put in a box by *your* concepts". i say this can only be flogged for so long.
as neon indicated, the line is "God is unknowable and not to be put in a box by *your* concepts". i say this can only be flogged for so long.
Frank Noir
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2003
- Posts
- 723
Quite a funny text.
The author is 99% anti-dogmatic and anti-fundamentalist - but still want us to believe in miracles and to live "the life that Christ commanded us to live".
The rest of the statements could (for us karma-thinking atheists) just as well be headlined "You're not contributing to making the world a better place if..."
MarshAlien
Marshini, anyone? Hic!
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2007
- Posts
- 1,426
Well, He's never said anything when I've misrepresented Him before . . .
. . . and I have made Him a character in at least two of my Lit stories, more or less . . .
. . . so I [size=+2]CRACK![/size]
okay, that hurt. Never mind.
[size=-2]sheesh, you'd think I asked THE QUESTION or something[/size]
seriously, nice posting, SK. And the difference between the school of thought criticized by this writer and science, of course, is that science that does not admit of the possibility that it's wrong is not really science.
. . . and I have made Him a character in at least two of my Lit stories, more or less . . .
. . . so I [size=+2]CRACK![/size]
okay, that hurt. Never mind.
[size=-2]sheesh, you'd think I asked THE QUESTION or something[/size]
seriously, nice posting, SK. And the difference between the school of thought criticized by this writer and science, of course, is that science that does not admit of the possibility that it's wrong is not really science.
Similar threads
