Yet Another Trumper Voting Fraud Charge

The Trumper Republicans continue to dominate the ranks of those charged with voter fraud in the 2020 elections--a woman tampering with voting machines in Michigan.

The Trumpers are certainly right about there being voter fraud in the elections. They were the ones doing it.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...-with-voting-machine/ar-AATgdBH?ocid=msedgntp

Why is it that one of the board's eagle eyed Deplorables didn't post this latest example of ACTUAL election tampering in service to the orange POS traitor???

(We know why)

Deplorables are pathetic and.....,

SAD!!!
 
That's why we won the election - voter fraud.

Good job in keeping with the dem mandate of always accuse others of what you are actually doing.
 
That's why we won the election - voter fraud.

Good job in keeping with the dem mandate of always accuse others of what you are actually doing.

Wonderful. You have the Trump technique down pat.

Such a loser.
 
Wonderful. You have the Trump technique down pat.

Such a loser.

And in direct response to a post that links to a case of Republican fraud, too! Hey, when the facts aren't on your side, yelling louder can be a surprisingly effective strategy.
 
So, let me get this straight:

The article proves that a Republican tried to tamper with the voting machines so that the votes would go to Trump instead of Biden. Which is voter fraud.

So then the Republicans can claim "Voter Fraud" cost them the election, and Trump should be the rightful winner. Even though they were committing voter fraud on Trump's behalf, they are saying the election should be nullified and go to Trump because of "Voter Fraud."

"Hey, so you caught me cheating at poker, so that means I should automatically win the pot."

Maybe it's just post awareness confusions kicking in, but I cant seem to follow the logic in that at all.
 
They keep on keepin' on .....


"MILWAUKEE (CN) — A former high-ranking Milwaukee election official charged with requesting fraudulent military absentee ballots in the recent general election had her first day in court on Friday, where she pleaded not guilty to three voter fraud misdemeanors.

Kimberly Zapata, 45, faces one felony count of misconduct in public office and three counts of making a false statement to obtain or vote an absentee ballot, all misdemeanors. The felony carries a maximum penalty of a $10,000 fine or 3.5 years in prison, or both; the misdemeanors carry potential penalties of a $1,000 fine, six months imprisonment, or both.

Prosecutors say Zapata used fake names to falsely apply for three absentee ballots meant for military and overseas voters, then used her governmental access to obtain the home address of state Republican lawmaker Janel Brandtjen of Menomonee Falls and had the fraudulent ballots mailed there."

--------------------

"Brandtjen—who has courted election deniers and given a platform to conspiracy theorists as chair of the Wisconsin Assembly’s elections and campaigns committee—was recently frozen out of a legislative Republican caucus because its members said they no longer trust her, a move Brandtjen called “petty.” Reports indicate it is likely she will lose her committee chairmanship in the next legislative session slated to start in January.

A group of roughly a dozen protesters supporting Zapata and beating the drum for efforts to expose alleged election fraud gathered outside the Milwaukee County Safety Building before Zapata’s arraignment on Friday.

Among them was Harry Wait, a 68-year-old Wisconsinite who is also currently charged with voter fraud in Racine County Circuit Court. Wait is a member of H.O.T. Government, a group that has spread false claims about widespread fraud in the 2020 election and has sued the WEC over absentee voting procedures the group claims are illegal."

https://www.courthousenews.com/former-milwaukee-election-official-pleads-not-guilty-to-voter-fraud/
 
Bwahahaha! 81 million ... for the basement dweller
In the middle of the worst pandemic in decades, it makes perfect sense that a majority of the voters were smart enough to stay home where possible, and not to hold it against a politician for doing the same and setting an example for all.
 
That's why we won the election - voter fraud.

Good job in keeping with the dem mandate of always accuse others of what you are actually doing.
It's a very strange political position to have - that the GOP are engaged in voter fraud which causes them to lose elections.

Here's another take; Perhaps the cases of voter fraud by GOP voters are so prevalent IS BECAUSE the DOJ isn't prosecuting the DNC cases at all?
 
^^^ Ooo, Ooo, Oooo !!! I know, I know, I know .....

Horshack.

Because there's nothing to prosecute Mr. Kotter.

Very good Arnold.
 
TRUMP FRAUD CHARGE .... THAT MUST BE WHY HE GOT ELECTED IN 2020, HUH?

DEMOCRATS ALWAYS ACCUSE OTHERS OF EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING.
 
When trying to determine sanity and presences of mind, one of the questions they sometimes use is 'Who is the current President of the United States?'

How many think Dumnassed would pass?

.
 
TRUMP FRAUD CHARGE .... THAT MUST BE WHY HE GOT ELECTED IN 2020, HUH?

DEMOCRATS ALWAYS ACCUSE OTHERS OF EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING.
Care to back up that assertion with any fact? 60 plus court cases failed, but I am sure you have the ace up your sleeve, or is up your ass?
 
^^^ Ooo, Ooo, Oooo !!! I know, I know, I know .....

Horshack.

Because there's nothing to prosecute Mr. Kotter.

Very good Arnold.

Ah yes, the old coverup isn't really a coverup because we say it isn't ploy.

Very poorly done, but nice attempt.

Care to back up that assertion with any fact? 60 plus court cases failed, but I am sure you have the ace up your sleeve, or is up your ass?
Actually, those cases didn't "fail" they were dismissed based on technicalities. Technicalities which all seem to fall under the rubric that the court just didn't want to get involved with them.

Strange how that works when the rule is that the allegations in a complaint MUST BE taken as true for the purposes of filing the complaint. That includes the allegation that the complaining party has standing to sue in the court in which the case was filed. Yet somehow none of the cases had such standing...
 
Ah yes, the old coverup isn't really a coverup because we say it isn't ploy.

Very poorly done, but nice attempt.


Actually, those cases didn't "fail" they were dismissed based on technicalities. Technicalities which all seem to fall under the rubric that the court just didn't want to get involved with them.

Strange how that works when the rule is that the allegations in a complaint MUST BE taken as true for the purposes of filing the complaint. That includes the allegation that the complaining party has standing to sue in the court in which the case was filed. Yet somehow none of the cases had such standing...
Ummm should I bother to go get that post where you stated that the prosecution losing on a technicality was "good lawyering by the defence"?....nah why bother....
 
Ummm should I bother to go get that post where you stated that the prosecution losing on a technicality was "good lawyering by the defence"?....nah why bother....
Whatever floats yer boat. Especially when it's as leaky as yours seems to be...
 
But you didn't deny what I wrote, now did you......*chuckles*
The day you personally step into court to defend another person's claims/liberties is the day I'll actually discuss what "good lawyering" really consists of.

Not that I'll need to because at that point even someone as stupid as you are will understand.
 
The day you personally step into court to defend another person's claims/liberties is the day I'll actually discuss what "good lawyering" really consists of.

Not that I'll need to because at that point even someone as stupid as you are will understand.
Like I said prior, you're no lawyer, at best, a shitty paralegal....
 
Back
Top