Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't understand what this chart shows, and if 8Letters truly doesn't read or respond to any replies to the thread I guess I'll never know.
Hey, Simon -Looking the Top Lists values for yesterday and today:
View attachment 2238775
Loving Wives had 4K votes swept, and the average rating went down!
Note: I will not be reading any replies to this post.
Why are you all engaging with this guy who has left, apart from all the quack stats he posts of course?
Stats can be interesting regardless of who posts them. But I don't know how much weight to give these. If accurate, it is weird that LW sweeps brought the average down, it doesn't seem like a category with inflated scores or lots of 5s. Just the opposite actually.
Kinda goes against your theory that LW readers are more intelligent?173k votes in LW vs 81k in I/T . Wow.
Like the other guy who famously "left". He's still here, giving feedback. Shrug.Very left. Much absent. Wow.
Or they can’t use their phones and keep pressing one by accident.Out of 18,297 votes in Mature, 1,088 were swept; the highest ratio. Does this indicate that the golden age is full of intrigue?
Why are you all engaging with this guy who has left, apart from all the quack stats he posts of course?
So many times. Just while I’ve been here.Candidate for the ignore list. <click!> I find the whole "pronouncement from on high, don't bother questioning my data, methods or motivations" approach to this to be maybe just a touch arrogant. He's pulled this crap before.
He's made an assumption there's been a sweep gone through during the period in the data set - I'm with Bramblethorn that it's different "top stories" leading to different numbers.Out of 18,297 votes in Mature, 1,088 were swept; the highest ratio. Does this indicate that the golden age is full of intrigue?
Well that, and also the fact that there was no hounding and no one (almost) suggested he should pull anything down over the issue.He's made an assumption there's been a sweep gone through during the period in the data set - I'm with Bramblethorn that it's different "top stories" leading to different numbers.
Did a sweep go through on 5th June? Anyone know? My CP is still whirling wheels of death - I usually can spot a sweep in my numbers.
I'm inclined to think, like MrPixel, it's all part of 8letters vendetta against the AH for "hounding him off the site," which conveniently overlooks his blatant plagiarism which got him busted. Don't forget who the OP is, folks.
The Feedback Forum moderator had some strong thoughts on that point, which I think most people missed. He said people had been kicked off the site before for gross plagiarism, but left that call to the perpetrator in this occasion. Who then left, still thinking he had done nothing wrong.Well that, and also the fact that there was no hounding and no one (almost) suggested he should pull anything down over the issue.
I recall one or two people being fairly worked up (don't recall which), but generally it seemed to me like most people thought he should just edit the plagiarized passages into something original, or pull just that one story. Which is what I thought as well. Pulling everything seemed like a hissy fit, not a reasonable response.The Feedback Forum moderator had some strong thoughts on that point, which I think most people missed. He said people had been kicked off the site before for gross plagiarism, but left that call to the perpetrator in this occasion. Who then left, still thinking he had done nothing wrong.
He's made an assumption there's been a sweep gone through during the period in the data set - I'm with Bramblethorn that it's different "top stories" leading to different numbers.