WVa court ruling slips by today... finds 3 drug distributors not responsible for 'nuisance' over opioid crisis

butters

High on a Hill
Joined
Jul 2, 2009
Posts
84,451
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — A federal judge on Monday ruled in favor of three major U.S. drug distributors in a landmark lawsuit that accused them of causing a health crisis by distributing 81 million pills over eight years in one West Virginia county ravaged by opioid addiction.

seems they got off the hook because of the 'public nuisance' filing only previously seen to apply to public property or resources, and doesn't cover the ; the distributors blamed doctors for prescribing the opiates 'along with poor communication and pill quotas set by federal agents'.
He said to extend the law to cover the marketing and sale of opioids “is inconsistent with the history and traditional notions of nuisance.”
so in a state ravaged by opioid addiction, the (no doubt) robust pushing of the drugs at docs to prescribe, plus any little, yanno, financial incentives to do so, isn't covered under public nuisance. I wonder what it IS covered by, then.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...sedgntp&cvid=2f611594a3e943ebfcbbc3da163fd4f2
 
If you are black...walking down a street...that is considered a nuisance.
 
Back
Top