butters
High on a Hill
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2009
- Posts
- 84,451
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — A federal judge on Monday ruled in favor of three major U.S. drug distributors in a landmark lawsuit that accused them of causing a health crisis by distributing 81 million pills over eight years in one West Virginia county ravaged by opioid addiction.
seems they got off the hook because of the 'public nuisance' filing only previously seen to apply to public property or resources, and doesn't cover the ; the distributors blamed doctors for prescribing the opiates 'along with poor communication and pill quotas set by federal agents'.
so in a state ravaged by opioid addiction, the (no doubt) robust pushing of the drugs at docs to prescribe, plus any little, yanno, financial incentives to do so, isn't covered under public nuisance. I wonder what it IS covered by, then.He said to extend the law to cover the marketing and sale of opioids “is inconsistent with the history and traditional notions of nuisance.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...sedgntp&cvid=2f611594a3e943ebfcbbc3da163fd4f2